The cortical and subcortical forebrain connections of the marmoset prefrontal cortex (PFC) were examined by injecting the retrograde tracer, choleratoxin, and the anterograde tracer, biotin dextran amine, into four sites within the PFC. Two of the sites, the lateral and orbital regions, had previously been shown to provide functionally dissociable contributions to distinct forms of behavioral flexibility, attentional set-shifting and discrimination reversal learning, respectively. The dysgranular and agranular regions lying on the orbital and medial surfaces of the frontal lobes were most closely connected with limbic structures including cingulate cortex, amygdala, parahippocampal cortex, subiculum, hippocampus, hypothalamus, medial caudate nucleus, and nucleus accumbens as well as the magnocellular division of the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus and midline thalamic nuclei, consistent with findings in the rhesus monkey. In contrast, the granular region on the dorsal surface closely resembled area 8Ad in macaques and had connections restricted to posterior parietal cortex primarily associated with visuospatial functions. However, it also had connections with limbic cortex, including retrosplenial and caudal cingulate cortex as well as auditory processing regions in the superior temporal cortex. The granular region on the lateral convexity had the most extensive connections. Based on its architectonics and functionality, it resembled areas 12/45 in macaques. It had connections with high-order visual processing regions in the inferotemporal cortex and posterior parietal cortex, higher-order auditory and polymodal processing regions in the superior temporal cortex. In addition it had extensive connections with limbic regions including the amygdala, parahippocampal cortex, cingulate, and retrosplenial cortex.

Conditioned reinforcement refers to the capacity of a conditioned stimulus to support instrumental behavior by acquiring affective properties of the primary reinforcer with which it is associated. Conditioned reinforcers maintain behavior over protracted periods of time in the absence of, and potentially in conflict with, primary reinforcers and as such may play a fundamental role in complex social behavior. A relatively large body of evidence supports the view that the amygdala (and in particular the basolateral area) contributes to conditioned reinforcement by maintaining a representation of the affective value of conditioned stimuli. However, a recent study in primates (Malkova et al., 1997), using a second-order visual discrimination task, suggests that the amygdala is not critical for the conditioned reinforcement process. In the present study, excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala in a new world primate, the common marmoset, resulted in a progressive impairment in responding under a second-order schedule of food reinforcement. In addition, the responding of amygdala-lesioned animals was insensitive to the omission of the conditioned reinforcer, unlike that of control animals, for which responding was markedly reduced. In contrast, lesioned animals were unimpaired when responding on a progression of fixed-ratio schedules of primary reinforcement. These data confirm that the amygdala is critical for the conditioned reinforcement process in primates, and taken together with other recent work in monkeys, these results suggest that the contribution of the amygdala is to provide the affective value of specific reinforcers as accessed by associated conditioned stimuli.