This is an author version of the article published on:Questa è la versione dell'autore dell'articolo: Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR.Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, Di Nicolantonio F, Salazar R, Zecchin D, Beijersbergen RL, Bardelli A, Bernards R. Nature. 2012 Jan 26;483(7387):100-3. doi: 10.1038/nature10868. The final version is available at: La versione definitiva è disponibile alla URL:http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7387/full/nature10868.html . We therefore set out to screen a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) library representing the full complement of 518 human kinases 12 (the "kinome") and 17 additional kinase-related genes (Table S1) for genes whose inhibition confers sensitivity to PLX4032 in BRAF V600E mutant CRC. WiDr cells were infected with the lentiviral kinome shRNA collection and cultured in the absence or presence of PLX4032 for 10 and 18 days, respectively. After this, the relative abundance of shRNA vectors was determined by next generation sequencing of the bar code identifiers present in each shRNA vector (Fig. 1C, see methods). We arbitrarily considered only shRNA vectors that had been sequenced at least 300 times and which were depleted at least five-fold by the drug treatment. Fig. 1D shows that only very few of the 3388 shRNA vectors in the library met this stringent selection criterion, among which were three independent shRNA vectors targeting the Epidermal Growth FactorReceptor (EGFR, see Table S2 for all selected shRNAs). This suggested that suppression of EGFR synergizes with BRAF inhibition in these CRC cells. To validate this finding, we infected WiDr cells with each of these three EGFR shRNA vectors (all of which reduced EGFR levels (Fig. 1F)) and cultured these cells with or without PLX4032 for two weeks. . We therefore began by investigating a potential role of CDC25C in the activation of EGFR. We suppressed CDC25C in WiDr cells by shRNA and monitored levels of p-EGFR.We found that two independent shCDC25C vectors caused an increase in p-EGFR (Fig. 2E).Moreover, treatment of WiDr cells with PLX4032 inhibited phosphorylation of CDC25C at Thr48 (Fig. 2F), which has been shown to be required for its phosphatase activity 15 .Together, these data are consistent with a model in which BRAF inhibition leads to inhibition of MEK and ERK kinases, which in turn leads to a reduced activation of CDC25C. Inhibition of CDC25C in turn causes an increase in p-EGFR due to decreased dephosphorylation (Fig. 2E). Our data do not exclude that the related CDC25A and B or other phosphatases are also involved in this feedback regulation of EGFR.The EGFR is expressed primarily in epithelial cancers 17. Since melanomas are derived from the neural crest, we reasoned that the favourable response of melanomas to vemurafenib might result from the paucity of EGF receptors on these tumours and hence the 6 absence of the feedback activation of EGFR by BRAF inhibition. We compared EGFR expression in a panel of BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, colo...
EGFR targeted monoclonal antibodies are effective in a subset of metastatic colorectal tumors (mCRC). Inevitably, all patients develop resistance, which occurs through emergence of KRAS mutations in approximately 50% of the cases. We show that amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is associated with acquired resistance in patients who do not develop KRAS mutations during anti-EGFR therapy. Amplification of the MET locus was present in circulating tumor DNA before relapse was clinically evident. Functional studies demonstrate that MET activation confers resistance to anti-EGFR therapy both in vitro and in vivo. Notably, in patient-derived CRC xenografts, MET amplification correlated with resistance to EGFR blockade which could be overcome by MET kinase inhibitors. These results highlight the role of MET in mediating primary and secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC and encourage the use of MET inhibitors in patients displaying resistance as a result of MET amplification.
SummaryThe immunosuppressive protein PD-L1 is upregulated in many cancers and contributes to evasion of the host immune system. The relative importance of the tumor microenvironment and cancer cell-intrinsic signaling in the regulation of PD-L1 expression remains unclear. We report that oncogenic RAS signaling can upregulate tumor cell PD-L1 expression through a mechanism involving increases in PD-L1 mRNA stability via modulation of the AU-rich element-binding protein tristetraprolin (TTP). TTP negatively regulates PD-L1 expression through AU-rich elements in the 3′ UTR of PD-L1 mRNA. MEK signaling downstream of RAS leads to phosphorylation and inhibition of TTP by the kinase MK2. In human lung and colorectal tumors, RAS pathway activation is associated with elevated PD-L1 expression. In vivo, restoration of TTP expression enhances anti-tumor immunity dependent on degradation of PD-L1 mRNA. We demonstrate that RAS can drive cell-intrinsic PD-L1 expression, thus presenting therapeutic opportunities to reverse the innately immunoresistant phenotype of RAS mutant cancers.
There are no effective therapies for the ~30% of human malignancies with mutant RAS oncogenes. Using a kinome-centered synthetic lethality screen, we find that suppression of the ERBB3 receptor tyrosine kinase sensitizes KRAS mutant lung and colon cancer cells to MEK inhibitors. We show that MEK inhibition results in MYC-dependent transcriptional upregulation of ERBB3, which is responsible for intrinsic drug resistance. Drugs targeting both EGFR and ERBB2, each capable of forming heterodimers with ERBB3, can reverse unresponsiveness to MEK inhibition by decreasing inhibitory phosphorylation of the proapoptotic proteins BAD and BIM. Moreover, ERBB3 protein level is a biomarker of response to combinatorial treatment. These data suggest a combination strategy for treating KRAS mutant colon and lung cancers and a way to identify the tumors that are most likely to benefit from such combinatorial treatment.
Personalized cancer medicine is based on the concept that targeted therapies are effective on subsets of patients whose tumors carry specific molecular alterations. Several mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are in preclinical or clinical trials for cancers, but the molecular basis of sensitivity or resistance to these inhibitors among patients is largely unknown. Here we have identified oncogenic variants of phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, α polypeptide (PIK3CA) and KRAS as determinants of response to the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Human cancer cells carrying alterations in the PI3K pathway were responsive to everolimus, both in vitro and in vivo, except when KRAS mutations occurred concomitantly or were exogenously introduced. In human cancer cells with mutations in both PIK3CA and KRAS, genetic ablation of mutant KRAS reinstated response to the drug. Consistent with these data, PIK3CA mutant cells, but not KRAS mutant cells, displayed everolimus-sensitive translation. Importantly, in a cohort of metastatic cancer patients, the presence of oncogenic KRAS mutations was associated with lack of benefit after everolimus therapy. Thus, our results demonstrate that alterations in the KRAS and PIK3CA genes may represent biomarkers to optimize treatment of patients with mTOR inhibitors.
Mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are responsible for tumorigenesis and represent favored therapeutic targets in oncology. We exploited homologous recombination to knock-in individual cancer mutations in the genome of nontransformed human cells. Sequential introduction of multiple mutations was also achieved, demonstrating the potential of this strategy to construct tumor progression models. Knock-in cells displayed allele-specific activation of signaling pathways and mutation-specific phenotypes different from those obtainable by ectopic oncogene expression. Profiling of a library of pharmacological agents on the mutated cells showed striking sensitivity or resistance phenotypes to pathway-targeted drugs, often matching those of tumor cells carrying equivalent cancer mutations. Thus, knock-in of single or multiple cancer alleles provides a pharmacogenomic platform for the rational design of targeted therapies.cancer mutation ͉ oncogene addiction ͉ pharmacogenomic ͉ targeted therapies ͉ tumor progression model T he construction of model systems that accurately recapitulate the genetic alterations present in human cancer is a prerequisite to understand the cellular properties imparted by the mutated alleles and to identify genotype and tumor-specific pharmacological responses. In this regard, mammalian cell lines have been widely used as model systems to functionally characterize cancer alleles carrying point mutations and to develop and validate anticancer drugs. These models typically involve the ectopic expression (by means of plasmid transfection or viral infection) of mutated cDNAs in human or mouse cells (1). Although these approaches have yielded remarkable results, they are typically hampered by at least two caveats. First, the expression is achieved by transient or stable transfection of cDNAs, often resulting in over-expression of the target allele at levels that do not recapitulate what occurs in human cancers. Second, the expression of the mutated cDNA is achieved under the control of nonendogenous viral promoters. As a result, the mutated alleles cannot be appropriately (endogenously) modulated in the target cells. While such systems in which mutated oncogenes are ectopically expressed under exogenous promoters have been instrumental in dissecting their oncogenic properties, they have also led to controversial results. For example, studies focused on oncogene-mediated transformation and senescence have generated conflicting data depending on whether the cancer alleles were ectopically expressed or permanently introduced in the genome of mouse or human cells (2-5). To address the limitation of current models, we have used targeted homologous recombination to introduce (knock-in, KI) a panel of cancer alleles in human somatic cells. Specifically, we focused on EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutated alleles that are found in multiple cancer types. Mutant cells have then been used to study the biochemical and transforming potential of common cancer alleles and to identify genotype-specific ...
A critical step toward defining tailored therapy in patients with cancer is the identification of genetic interactions that may impair-or boost-the efficacy of selected therapeutic approaches. Cell models able to recapitulate combinations of genetic aberrations are important to find drug-genotype interactions poorly affected by the heterogeneous genetics of human tumors. In order to identify novel pharmacogenomic relationships, we employed an isogenic cell panel that reconstructs cancer genetic scenarios. We screened a library of 43 compounds in human hTERT-HME1 epithelial cells in which PTEN or RB1 were silenced in combination with the targeted knockin of cancer-associated mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA oncogenes. Statistical analysis and clustering algorithms were applied to display similar drug response profiles and mutation-specific patterns of activity. From the screen, we discovered that proteasome inhibitors show selectivity toward BRAF V600E-mutant cells, irrespective of PTEN or RB1 expression. Preferential targeting of BRAF-mutant cells by proteasome inhibitors was corroborated in a second BRAF V600E isogenic model, as well as in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines by the use of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Notably, carfilzomib also showed striking in vivo activity in a BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors is dependent on persistent BRAF signaling, because BRAF V600E blockade by PLX4720 reversed sensitivity to carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells. Our findings indicated that proteasome inhibition might represent a valuable targeting strategy in BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(12); 2950-61. Ó2013 AACR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.