From a critical review of the evidence on the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway and its mode of action, the following conclusions were reached. (1) Both local and systemic inflammation may be suppressed by electrical stimulation of the peripheral cut end of either vagus. (2) The spleen mediates most of the systemic inflammatory response (measured by TNF-α production) to systemic endotoxin and is also the site where that response is suppressed by vagal stimulation. (3) The anti-inflammatory effect of vagal stimulation depends on the presence of noradrenaline-containing nerve terminals in the spleen. (4) There is no disynaptic connection from the vagus to the spleen via the splenic sympathetic nerve: vagal stimulation does not drive action potentials in the splenic nerve. (5) Acetylcholine-synthesizing T lymphocytes provide an essential non-neural link in the anti-inflammatory pathway from vagus to spleen. (6) Alpha-7 subunit-containing nicotinic receptors are essential for the vagal anti-inflammatory action: their critical location is uncertain, but is suggested here to be on splenic sympathetic nerve terminals. (7) The vagal anti-inflammatory pathway can be activated electrically or pharmacologically, but it is not the efferent arm of the inflammatory reflex response to endotoxemia.

Key pointsr It is believed that the CNS controls inflammation via the autonomic nervous system, but the strength of this action and the neural pathways responsible are unclear.r In anaesthetized rats we measured the inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 60 μg kg −1 , I.V.) by plasma tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) levels 90 min later.r Bilateral section of the splanchnic sympathetic nerves before LPS treatment resulted in a 5-fold increase in the plasma TNFα response, but bilateral vagotomy had no effect.r LPS treatment strongly increased efferent activity in the splanchnic sympathetic nerve and its splenic branch; vagotomy did not affect this.r These results show that, besides directly stimulating inflammation, LPS engages a powerful anti-inflammatory reflex that can inhibit the plasma TNFα response by 80%.r The reflex efferent arm is in the splanchnic sympathetic nerves; the vagi play no part.Abstract We investigated a neural reflex that controls the strength of inflammatory responses to immune challenge -the inflammatory reflex. In anaesthetized rats challenged with intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 60 μg kg −1 ), we found strong increases in plasma levels of the key inflammatory mediator tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) 90 min later. Those levels were unaffected by previous bilateral cervical vagotomy, but were enhanced approximately 5-fold if the greater splanchnic sympathetic nerves had been cut. Sham surgery had no effect, and plasma corticosterone levels were unaffected by nerve sections, so could not explain this result. Electrophysiological recordings demonstrated that efferent neural activity in the splanchnic nerve and its splenic branch was strongly increased by LPS treatment. Splenic nerve activity was dependent on inputs from the splanchnic nerves: vagotomy had no effect on the activity in either nerve.Together, these data demonstrate that immune challenge with this dose of LPS activates a neural reflex that is powerful enough to cause an 80% suppression of the acute systemic inflammatory response. The efferent arm of this reflex is in the splanchnic sympathetic nerves, not the vagi as previously proposed. As with other physiological responses to immune challenge, the afferent pathway is presumptively humoral: the present data show that vagal afferents play no measurable part. Because inflammation sits at the gateway to immune responses, this reflex could play an important role in immune function as well as inflammatory diseases.

The 'inflammatory reflex' acts through efferent neural connections from the central nervous system to lymphoid organs, particularly the spleen, that suppress the production of inflammatory cytokines. Stimulation of the efferent vagus has been shown to suppress inflammation in a manner dependent on the spleen and splenic nerves. The vagus does not innervate the spleen, so a synaptic connection from vagal preganglionic neurons to splenic sympathetic postganglionic neurons was suggested. We tested this idea in rats. In a preparatory operation, the anterograde tracer DiI was injected bilaterally into the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus and the retrograde tracer Fast Blue was injected into the spleen. On histological analysis 7-9 weeks later, 883 neurons were retrogradely labelled from the spleen with Fast Blue as follows: 89% in the suprarenal ganglia (65% left, 24% right); 11% in the left coeliac ganglion; but none in the right coeliac or either of the superior mesenteric ganglia. Vagal terminals anterogradely labelled with DiI were common in the coeliac but sparse in the suprarenal ganglia, and confocal analysis revealed no putative synaptic connection with any Fast Blue-labelled cell in either ganglion. Electrophysiological experiments in anaesthetized rats revealed no effect of vagal efferent stimulation on splenic nerve activity or on that of 15 single splenic-projecting neurons recorded in the suprarenal ganglion. Together, these findings indicate that vagal efferent neurons in the rat neither synapse with splenic sympathetic neurons nor drive their ongoing activity.

Located in the midline anterior wall of the third cerebral ventricle (i.e. the lamina terminalis), the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) receives a unique set of afferent neural inputs from fore-, mid- and hindbrain. These afferent connections enable it to receive neural signals related to several important aspects of homeostasis. Included in these afferent projections are (i) neural inputs from two adjacent circumventricular organs, the subfornical organ and organum vasculosum laminae terminalis, that respond to hypertonicity, circulating angiotensin II or other humoural factors, (ii) signals from cutaneous warm and cold receptors that are relayed to MnPO, respectively, via different subnuclei in the lateral parabrachial nucleus and (iii) input from the medulla associated with baroreceptor and vagal afferents. These afferent signals reach appropriate neurones within the MnPO that enable relevant neural outputs, both excitatory and inhibitory, to be activated or inhibited. The efferent neural pathways that proceed from the MnPO terminate on (i) neuroendocrine cells in the hypothalamic supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei to regulate vasopressin release, while polysynaptic pathways from MnPO to cortical sites may drive thirst and water intake, (ii) thermoregulatory pathways to the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and medullary raphé to regulate shivering, brown adipose tissue and skin vasoconstriction, (iii) parvocellular neurones in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus that drive autonomic pathways influencing cardiovascular function. As well, (iv) other efferent pathways from the MnPO to sites in the ventrolateral pre-optic nucleus, perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamic area and midbrain influence sleep mechanisms.

The possibility of inducing a suspended animation state similar to natural torpor would be greatly beneficial in medical science, since it would avoid the adverse consequence of the powerful autonomic activation evoked by external cooling. Previous attempts to systemically inhibit metabolism were successful in mice, but practically ineffective in nonhibernators. Here we show that the selective pharmacological inhibition of key neurons in the central pathways for thermoregulatory cold defense is sufficient to induce a suspended animation state, resembling natural torpor, in a nonhibernator. In rats kept at an ambient temperature of 15°C and under continuous darkness, the prolonged inhibition (6 h) of the rostral ventromedial medulla, a key area of the central nervous pathways for thermoregulatory cold defense, by means of repeated microinjections (100 nl) of the GABA A agonist muscimol (1 mM), induced the following: (1) a massive cutaneous vasodilation; (2) drastic drops in deep brain temperature (reaching a nadir of 22.44 Ϯ 0.74°C), heart rate (from 440 Ϯ 13 to 207 Ϯ 12 bpm), and electroencephalography (EEG) power; (3) a modest decrease in mean arterial pressure; and (4) a progressive shift of the EEG power spectrum toward slow frequencies. After the hypothermic bout, all animals showed a massive increase in NREM sleep Delta power, similarly to that occurring in natural torpor. No behavioral abnormalities were observed in the days following the treatment. Our results strengthen the potential role of the CNS in the induction of hibernation/torpor, since CNS-driven changes in organ physiology have been shown to be sufficient to induce and maintain a suspended animation state.

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is a novel strategy used to treat inflammatory conditions. Therapeutic VNS activates both efferent and afferent fibers; however, the effects attributable to vagal afferent stimulation are unclear. Here, we tested if selective activation of afferent fibers in the abdominal vagus suppresses systemic inflammation. In urethane-anesthetized rats challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 60 µg/kg, i.v.), abdominal afferent VNS (2 Hz for 20 min) reduced plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) levels 90 min later by 88% compared with unmanipulated animals. Pre-cutting the cervical vagi blocked this anti-inflammatory action. Interestingly, the surgical procedure to expose and prepare the abdominal vagus for afferent stimulation ('vagal manipulation') also had an anti-inflammatory action. Levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were inversely related to those of TNF. Prior bilateral section of the splanchnic sympathetic nerves reversed the anti-inflammatory actions of afferent VNS and vagal manipulation. Sympathetic efferent activity in the splanchnic nerve was shown to respond reflexly to abdominal vagal afferent stimulation. These data demonstrate that experimentally activating abdominal vagal afferent fibers suppresses systemic inflammation, and that the efferent neural pathway for this action is in the splanchnic sympathetic nerves.

The original model proposed that the inflammatory reflex is a vago-vagal reflex that controls immune function. We posit that, in the endotoxaemic animal model, the vagus nerves do not appear to play a role. The evidence suggests that the efferent motor pathway, termed here the 'splanchnic anti-inflammatory pathway', is purely sympathetic, travelling via the greater splanchnic nerves to regulate the ensuing inflammatory response to immune challenges.Exposure to immune challenges results in the development of inflammation. An insufficient inflammatory response can be life-threatening, whereas an exaggerated response is also detrimental because it causes tissue damage and, in extreme cases, septic shock that can lead to death. Hence, inflammation must be finely regulated. It is generally accepted that the brain inhibits inflammation induced by an immune challenge in two main ways: humorally, by activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to release glucocorticoids; and neurally, via a mechanism that has been termed the 'inflammatory reflex'. The efferent arm of this reflex (the neural-to-immune link) was thought to be the 'cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway'. Here, we discuss data that support the hypothesis that the vagus nerves play no role in the control of inflammation in the endotoxaemic animal model. We have shown and posit that it is the greater splanchnic nerves that are activated in response to the immune challenge and that, in turn, drive postganglionic sympathetic neurons to inhibit inflammation.

Following an immune challenge, there is two-way communication between the nervous and immune systems. It is proposed that a neural reflex--the inflammatory reflex--regulates the plasma levels of the key proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α, and that its efferent pathway is in the splanchnic sympathetic nerves. The evidence for this reflex is based on experiments on anesthetized animals, but anesthesia itself suppresses inflammation, confounding interpretation. Here, we show that previous section of the splanchnic nerves strongly enhances the levels of plasma TNF-α in conscious rats 90 min after they received intravenous LPS (60 μg/kg). The same reflex mechanism, therefore, applies in conscious as in anesthetized animals. In anesthetized rats, we then determined the longer-term effects of splanchnic nerve section on responses to LPS (60 μg/kg iv). We confirmed that prior splanchnic nerve section enhanced the early (90 min) peak in plasma TNF-α and found that it reduced the 90-min peak of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10; both subsequently fell to low levels in all animals. Splanchnic nerve section also enhanced the delayed rise in two key proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and interferon γ. That enhancement was undiminished after 6 h, when other measured cytokines had subsided. Finally, LPS treatment caused hypotensive shock in rats with cut splanchnic nerves but not in sham-operated animals. These findings demonstrate that reflex activation of the splanchnic anti-inflammatory pathway has a powerful and sustained restraining influence on inflammatory processes.