(1) Influenza causes a significant health and socio-economic burden every year, and health personnel (HP) are at higher risk of exposure to respiratory pathogens than the general population. (2) The study’s purpose was to describe and compare influenza vaccine uptake and its prognostic factors among Medical Doctors (MDs) and Non-Medical Health Personnel (NMHP) vs. Non-HP (NHP). We analyzed 2014–2018 data (n = 105,608) from the Italian Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System PASSI that, since 2008, has been collecting health-related information continuously in sampled adults. (3) MDs and NMHP represented, respectively, 1.1% and 4.6% of the sample. Among HP, 22.8% (CI 19.8–26.1%) of MDs and 8.5% (CI 7.5–9.5%) of NMHP reported to have been vaccinated vs. 6.3% (CI 6.1–6.5%) in NHP. This difference is confirmed in the three categories (MDs, NMHP, NHP), even more across age groups: in 18–34 yy, respectively, 9.9%, 4.4%, 3.4% vs. 28.4%, 13.9%, 10.6% in 50–64 yy. PASSI surveillance shows an increasing influenza vaccination uptake over time, especially among MDs (22.2% in 2014 vs. 30.5% in 2018). (4) Despite such an increase, especially among younger HP, influenza vaccination uptake is low. Even more under pandemic scenarios, these figures represent key information to address effective strategies for disease prevention and health promotion.
(1) Influenza causes a significant health and socio-economic burden every year, and health personnel (HP) are at higher risk of exposure to respiratory pathogens than general population. (2) The study purpose was to describe and compare influenza vaccine uptake and its prognostic factors among Medical Doctors (MDs) and Non-Medical Health Personnel (NMHP) vs Non-HP (NHP). We analysed 2014-2018 data (N=105,608) from the Italian Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System PASSI that, since 2008, has been collecting health-related information continuously in sampled adults. (3) MDs and NMHP represented, respectively, 1.1% and 4.6% of the sample. Among HP, 22.8% (CI 19.8% - 26.1%) of MDs and 8.5% (CI 7.5% - 9.5%) of NMHP reported to have been vaccinated vs 6.3% (CI 6.1% - 6.5%) in NHP. This difference is confirmed in the three categories (MDs, NMHP, NHP), even more across age groups: in 18-34yy, respectively, 9.9%, 4.4%, 3.4% vs 28.4%, 13.9%, 10.6% in 50-64yy. PASSI surveillance shows an increasing influenza vaccination uptake over time, especially among MDs (22.2% in 2014 vs 30.5% in 2018). (4) Despite such increase, especially among younger HP, influenza vaccination uptake is low. Even more under pandemic scenarios, these figures represent key information to address effective strategies for disease prevention and health promotion.
Background Climate change (CC) is a public health (PH) issue of growing concern. Health care systems in every country have a significant impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) causing global warming, but there seems to be a general lack of knowledge about this. As members of the junior study group on CC and PH of the Italian Society of Hygiene (SItI), we launched a project of shared education and literature research about the carbon footprint of healthcare (HCCF). We believe such an effort to be useful in spreading awareness and promoting change both in clinical practice, health care management and at policymaking level. Objectives To answer these questions: What is the estimated national and global HCCF? Which activities contribute to HCCF? What are the possible actions and policies to reduce HCCF while providing universal health care of good quality in all countries? From Dec 2019 to Feb 2020 we used databases and backward citation searching to retrieve references which we split among individuals to process, then we shared summaries of the material with the group. Results HCCF makes about 4.4% of all GHGE, with important variations among countries. We found estimates on emissions for various activities (e.g. operating theatres) and items (e.g. inhalers), as well as proposed solutions for practitioners, managers, manufacturers and policymakers (e.g. low-impact technologies, advocacy, health promotion to reduce healthcare volumes). Conclusions HCCF is complex, attributable to many components and amenable to mitigation through actions at all levels, with additional benefits for efficiency and public health. These conclusions are relevant for all countries as they imply joint international and transversal efforts throughout the world's health care sector. Key messages Current data and analysis, available for several services and in many countries, show healthcare carbon footprint is significant. Emissions from health sector can be reduced while granting universal healthcare globally.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.