Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Background
FDG-PET/CT clinical use for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is of relevant importance, since it provides information about presence and extension of the infection. However, asymptomatic patients with incidental FDG uptake on CIED are challenging.
Purpose
The primary objective of this observational study was to assess the diagnostic role of FDG PET/CT in patients without a suspicious of CIED infection. The secondary objective was to identify qualitative and semiquantitative predictors of CIED infection.
Methods
From 2017 to 2019 all FDG-PET/CT scans of CIED patients were analysed, the indications were a suspicious of CIED or non-cardiovascular infection, or oncological follow up. Four expert nuclear medicine physicians blindly reviewed all scans, focusing on FDG uptake in pocket and/or in extracardiac lead parts. They reported standardized uptake values (SUV), liver and blood pool target-to-background ratios, metabolic tumour volume (MTV). 6 months follow up after PET/CT scan was performed for eventual CIED extraction because of infection.
Results
320 FDG-PET/CT scans were considered. Median age was 74 [33-94] years, 219/320 (68%) males. 122/320 (38%) scans presented FDG uptake around pocket and/or extracardiac lead parts; and 65/320 (20%) scans reported suspicious uptake. We identified these cut-off criteria as predictors of CIED extraction: TARGET SUV max >2.6 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 89%), LIVER-TARGET SUV max >1.3 (sensitivity 68%, specificity 89%). Both these values also demonstrated to be good predictors of CIED infection after 6 months follow up (p<0,001).
Conclusion
FDG-PET/CT uptake in asymptomatic CIED patients is underestimated and may be related to subtle CIED infection. By introducing high-specific SUV cut-off values, a considerable impact on patient management is expected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.