Inactivating mutations in distinct G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are currently being identified as the cause of a steadily growing number of human diseases. Based on previous studies showing that GPCRs are assembled from multiple independently stable folding units, we speculated that such mutant receptors might be functionally rescued by ‘supplying’ individual folding domains that are lacking or misfolded in the mutant receptors, by using a co‐expression strategy. To test the feasibility of this approach, a series of nine mutant V2 vasopressin receptors known to be responsible for X‐linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus were used as model systems. These mutant receptors contained nonsense, frameshift, deletion or missense mutations in the third intracellular loop or the last two transmembrane helices. Studies with transfected COS‐7 cells showed that none of these mutant receptors, in contrast to the wild‐type V2 receptor, was able to bind detectable amounts of the radioligand, [3H]arginine vasopressin, or to activate the G(S)/adenylyl cyclase system. Moreover, immunological studies demonstrated that the mutant receptors were not trafficked properly to the cell surface. However, several of the nine mutant receptors regained considerable functional activity upon co‐expression with a C‐terminal V2 receptor peptide spanning the sequence where the various mutations occur. In many cases, the restoration of receptor activity by the co‐expressed receptor peptide was accompanied by a significant increase in cell surface receptor density. These findings may lead to the design of novel strategies in the treatment of diseases caused by inactivating mutations in distinct GPCRs.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a fatal disease without effective therapy. Identification of new biomarkers for prognosis would enable more rational selections of strategies to cure patients with GBM and prevent disease relapse.MethodsSeven datasets derived from GBM patients using microarray or next generation sequencing in R2 online database (http://r2.amc.nl) were extracted and then analyzed using JMP software. The survival distribution was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and the significance was determined using log-rank statistics. The sensitivity of a panel of GBM cell lines in response to temozolomide (TMZ), salinomycin, celastrol, and triptolide treatments was evaluated using MTS and tumor-sphere formation assay.FindingsWe identified that CD44, ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 3 (ABCC3), and tumor necrosis factor receptor subfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A) as highly expressed genes in GBMs are associated with patients' poor outcomes and therapy resistance. Furthermore, these three markers combined with MGMT, a conventional GBM marker, can classify GBM patients into five new subtypes with different overall survival time in response to treatment. The four-gene signature and the therapy response of GBMs to a panel of therapeutic compounds were confirmed in a panel of GBM cell lines.InterpretationThe data indicate that the four-gene panel can be used as a therapy response index for GBM patients and potential therapeutic targets. These results provide important new insights into the early diagnosis and the prognosis for GBM patients and introduce potential targets for GBM therapeutics.FundBaylor Scott & White Health Startup Fund (E.W.); Collaborative Faculty Research Investment Program (CFRIP) of Baylor University, Baylor Scott & White Health, and Baylor College of Medicine (E.W., T.S., J.H.H.); NIH R01 NS067435 (J.H.H.); Scott & White Plummer Foundation Grant (J.H.H.); National Natural Science Foundation of China 816280007 (J.H.H. and Fu.W.).