No abstract

Aneurysm of the mitral valve occurs most commonly in association with infective endocarditis of the aortic valve. The probable mechanism of its formation is destruction of the aortic valve which results in a regurgitant jet that strikes the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve, creating a secondary site of infection leading to the development of an aneurysm. Perforation of these aneurysms may occur, resulting in mitral regurgitation and pulmonary edema from a ventricle already volume overloaded from aortic regurgitation. This report describes the clinical and echocardiographic-pathologic findings in five patients with pathologically proven aneurysm of the mitral valve. There are no clinical features that appear specific for this abnormality. The two-dimensional echocardiographic feature that is helpful in the diagnosis is a bulge of the mitral valve leaflet toward the left atrium that persists throughout the cardiac cycle. Preoperative diagnosis is important because a mitral valve aneurysm may produce serious complications and is frequently overlooked during surgery. Repair of the aneurysm may be feasible; otherwise, valve replacement becomes necessary. Careful two-dimensional echocardiographic examination should be done in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis to detect an aneurysm of the mitral valve.

The rates for intermediate-term survival and event-free survival after CBC are very encouraging. Most patients without events were asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. Thus, in selected patients with mitral stenosis who require an interventional procedure, CBC is the procedure of choice at centers with physicians who have experience and skill in performing this procedure.

The 5s detected tones masked by gaussian noise under forced-choice and non-forced-choice psychophysical methods. The index of detectability, d', was calculated for each procedure under the assumption that failure to respond in non-forced-choice methods is equivalent to a middle-category response on a 3-point rating scale. This assumption was supported by independence of d 1 and the probability of an overt response, P(R), for a range of P(R) of .26-1.0. This result provides a modern answer to the classical question, "Is 'uncertain' a meaningful psychophysical response?" Certainly.