The in vitro activity of tigecycline was evaluated against 4913 baseline pathogens isolated from 1986 patients enrolled in 4 pivotal phase 3 clinical trials. The trials, which were conducted in 38 countries worldwide, involved patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections. Tigecycline was active against the most prevalent pathogens for each infection type, including gram-positive and gram-negative strains of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (MICs, < or =2 microg/mL for most pathogens). The spectrum of activity of tigecycline included important pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacteroides fragilis. A few genera, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and members of the tribe Proteeae, were generally less susceptible to tigecycline than were other gram-negative pathogens. The susceptibility of the pathogens to tigecycline was similar for isolates obtained from patients enrolled in the studies of complicated skin and skin-structure infection or of complicated intra-abdominal infection. For most pathogens, the susceptibility to tigecycline was similar across all geographic regions. The excellent expanded broad-spectrum activity of tigecycline demonstrated in vitro against clinical isolates confirmed its potential utility for pathogens associated with complicated skin and skin-structure infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections.
Purpose: Oncologic, urinary, and sexual outcomes are important to patients receiving prostate cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to determine if providing surgical report cards (SuReps) to surgeons resulted in improved patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: A prospective before-and-after study was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital. A total of 422 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were enrolled. The intervention was provision of report cards to surgeons. The control cohort was patients treated before report card feedback (pre-SuRep), and the intervention cohort was patients treated after report card feedback (post-SuRep). The primary outcomes were postoperative erectile function, urinary continence, and positive surgical margins. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Almost all patients (99%) were continent and the majority (59%) were potent prior to surgery. Complete 1-year followup was available for 400 patients (95%). Nerve sparing surgery increased from 70% pre-SuRep to 82% post-SuRep (p[0.01). There was a nonstatistically significant increase in the proportion of patients with a positive surgical margin post-SuRep (31% pre-SuRep vs 39% post-SuRep, p[0.08). There was no difference in postoperative erectile function (17% vs 18%, p[0.7) and a decrease in continence (75% vs 65%, p[0.02) at 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions: The SuRep platform allows accurate reporting of surgical outcomes that can be used for patient counseling. However, the provision of surgical report cards did not improve functional or oncologic outcomes. Longer durations of feedback, report card modifications, or targeted interventions are likely necessary to improve outcomes.
Introduction: Same-day discharge (SDD) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is emerging as the standard of care. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in perioperative characteristics, complication/readmissions rates and satisfaction/cost data between inpatient (IP) RARP and SDD RARP.Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021258848). A comprehensive search of PubMedÒ, EmbaseÒ, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and conference abstract publications was performed. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to control for heterogeneity and risk of bias.Results: A total of 14 studies were included with a pooled population of 3,795 patients, including 2,348 (61.9%) IP RARPs and 1,447 (38.1%) SDD RARPs. SDD pathways varied, though many commonalities were present in patient selection, perioperative recommendations and postoperative management. When compared to IP RARP, SDD RARP had no differences in !grade 3 ClavieneDindo complications (RR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 1.1, p¼0.07), 90-day readmission rates (RR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.3, 1.1, p¼0.10) or unscheduled emergency department visits (RR: 1.0, 95% CI 0.3, 3.1, p¼0.97). Cost savings per patient ranged between $367 and $2,109, and overall satisfaction was high at 87.5%e100%.Conclusions: SDD following RARP is both feasible and safe, while potentially offering health care cost savings with high patient satisfaction rates. Data from this study will inform the uptake and development of future SDD pathways in contemporary urological care such that it may be offered to a broader patient population.
The incidence of liver cirrhosis is increasing worldwide. Patients with cirrhosis are generally at a higher risk of harbouring hepatic and non-hepatic malignancies, including bladder cancer, likely due to the presence of related risk factors such as smoking. Cirrhosis can complicate both the operative and non-surgical management of bladder cancer. For example, cirrhotic patients undergoing abdominal surgery generally demonstrate worse postoperative outcomes, and chemotherapy in patients with cirrhosis often requires dose reduction due to its direct hepatotoxic effects and reduced hepatic clearance. Multiple other considerations in the peri-operative management for cirrhosis patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer must be taken into account to optimize outcomes in these patients. Unfortunately, the current literature specifically related to the treatment of cirrhotic bladder cancer patients remains sparse. We aim to review the literature on treatment considerations for this patient population with respect to perioperative, surgical, and adjuvant management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.