ObjectiveMidodrine hydrochloride is a short-acting pressor agent that raises blood pressure in the upright position in patients with orthostatic hypotension. The US Food and Drug Administration’s Subpart H approval, under which midodrine was initially approved, requires post-marketing studies to confirm midodrine’s clinical benefit in this indication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of midodrine with regard to symptom response.MethodsThis was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, multicenter study (NCT01518946). Following screening, patients aged ≥18 years with severe symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and on a stable dose of midodrine for at least 3 months were randomized to treatment with either their previous midodrine dose or placebo on day 1 and the respective alternate treatment on day 2. The primary endpoint measured time to syncopal symptoms or near-syncope using a 45-min tilt-table test at 1 h post-dose.ResultsThirty-three patients were screened for inclusion: 19 received at least one dose of midodrine and had at least one post-dose measurement of the primary endpoint. The least-squares mean time to syncopal symptoms or near-syncope after tilt-table initiation (mean ± standard error) was 1626.6 ± 186.8 s for midodrine and 1105.6 ± 186.8 s for placebo (difference, 521.0 s; 95 % confidence interval 124.2–971.7 s; p = 0.0131). There were 15 adverse events in 10 patients; all of these were mild or moderate in severity, with none considered by the investigators to be related to midodrine.InterpretationMidodrine is a well-tolerated and clinically effective treatment for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension.

Clopidogrel, a new platelet ADP receptor antagonist used for the prevention of vascular ischemic events, is converted to an active metabolite via the cytochrome P450 system. Patients with cirrhosis may not metabolize drugs normally and may, in addition, have a number of defects in the coagulation system. To assess the effect of cirrhosis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel, the authors performed an open-label, parallel-group study of 12 patients with Child-Pugh Class A or B cirrhosis and 12 matched controls. All 24 subjects received clopidogrel 75 mg PO QD for 10 days. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel and the major metabolite SR 26334 were analyzed on Days 1 and 10; pharmacodynamics were assessed by the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation and by bleeding time prolongation factor. Pharmacokinetic analysis of clopidogrel was limited due to low plasma concentrations arising from rapid hydrolysis to SR 26334. The Cmax at SS for clopidogrel was higher in cirrhotics than in normals. However, exposures to the metabolite SR 26334, as measured by AUC(tau), were comparable. At Day 10, there was not a statistically significant difference in mean inhibition of platelet aggregation (49.2% +/- 38.6% in cirrhotics vs. 66.7% +/- 7.5% in normals) or in bleeding time prolongation factor (1.64 +/- 0.49 in cirrhotics vs. 1.54 +/- 0.87 in normals) between groups. No significant adverse events, including bleeding events, were reported. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in this group of subjects with cirrhosis and matched normals. Therefore, no dosage adjustment of clopidogrel is required in patients with Child-Pugh Class A or B cirrhosis.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the dextro (d-) isomer of sotalol, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, in healthy young men and women after a single intravenous bolus dose. The design was open-label, randomized, parallel group. Each group (4 men and 4 women) received either 0.5, 1.5, or 3.0 mg/kg d-sotalol as an intravenous infusion for 2 minutes. Serial measurements of the d-sotalol plasma concentration and the Q-Tc interval data were recorded before, during, and for 72 hours after drug administration. The pharmacokinetics of d-sotalol were found to be well described by a three-compartment model with linear elimination clearance from the central compartment. There were no significant differences in the elimination clearance or volume of the central compartment between dose levels or between men and women. However, women were found to have a lower steady-state volume of distribution than men (1.20 L/Kg versus 1.43 L/Kg). The Q-Tc versus d-sotalol plasma concentration data were fitted to a model that assumed a distinct "effect compartment" and sigmoidal Emax response. The baseline Q-Tc, determined from the fittings, was found to be significantly higher in women (0.40 versus 0.38 seconds). The effect compartment clearance was found to be highly variable, with a median of 12.3 (range, 0.2-671,300) L/h. There were statistically significant differences in the effect compartment clearance by dose among men and by gender at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg. There were no significant differences detected between dose groups or genders for the d-sotalol effect site concentration at one half the maximum Q-Tc prolongation from baseline (EC50), EMAX, (the maximum Q-Tc prolongation from baseline) or the Hill coefficient. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of d-sotalol after intravenous administration are independent of dose and gender, because the difference between men and women in volume of distribution at steady-state is not clinically significant. The pharmacodynamics of Q-Tc prolongation produced by d-sotalol appear to be independent of dose and gender; however, there is considerable variability in the time course of effects on Q-Tc between individuals.

No abstract