Defining the functional relationships between proteins is critical for understanding virtually all aspects of cell biology. Large-scale identification of protein complexes has provided one important step towards this goal; however, even knowledge of the stoichiometry, affinity and lifetime of every protein-protein interaction would not reveal the functional relationships between and within such complexes. Genetic interactions can provide functional information that is largely invisible to protein-protein interaction data sets. Here we present an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) consisting of quantitative pairwise measurements of the genetic interactions between 743 Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in various aspects of chromosome biology (including DNA replication/repair, chromatid segregation and transcriptional regulation). This E-MAP reveals that physical interactions fall into two well-represented classes distinguished by whether or not the individual proteins act coherently to carry out a common function. Thus, genetic interaction data make it possible to dissect functionally multi-protein complexes, including Mediator, and to organize distinct protein complexes into pathways. In one pathway defined here, we show that Rtt109 is the founding member of a novel class of histone acetyltransferases responsible for Asf1-dependent acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56. This modification, in turn, enables a ubiquitin ligase complex containing the cullin Rtt101 to ensure genomic integrity during DNA replication.

A single double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) break will cause yeast cells to arrest in G2/M at the DNA damage checkpoint. If the dsDNA break cannot be repaired, cells will eventually override (that is, adapt to) this checkpoint, even though the damage that elicited the arrest is still present. Here, we report the identification of two adaptation-defective mutants that remain permanently arrested as large-budded cells when faced with an irreparable dsDNA break in a nonessential chromosome. This adaptation-defective phenotype was entirely relieved by deletion of RAD9, a gene required for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint arrest. We show that one mutation resides in CDC5, which encodes a polo-like kinase, whereas a second, less penetrant, adaptation-defective mutant is affected at the CKB2 locus, which encodes a nonessential specificity subunit of casein kinase II.

Sources of damage can be extrinsic, as well as intrinsic, to the cell. Extrinsic sources include irradiation and and Leland H. Hartwell* † *Division of Molecular Medicine chemical mutagens. Intrinsic damage is generated by the cell itself, either as a result of DNA metabolism or Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, C3-167 as a result of spontaneous chemical reactivity of DNA. Furthermore, different types of damage can be incurred Seattle, Washington 98109 † Department of Genetics at different stages of the cell cycle. For example, most cells rest in G1 and must accumulate most of their oxida-University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 tive damage to DNA during this stage, S phase cells risk incomplete replication and nucleotide misincorporation, and cells undergoing mitosis risk chromosome breakage during the segregation of sister chromatids. Checkpoints Monitor DNA Damage and Regulate Genetic studies have identified many of the compo-Cell Cycle Progression nents of checkpoints in the yeasts Saccharomyces cere-A number of surveillance systems exist that interrupt visiae (reviewed in Murray , 1995) and Schizosaccharocell cycle progression when damage to the genome or myces pombe (reviewed in D'Urso and Nurse, 1995), spindle is detected, or when cells have failed to comand cancer prone syndromes have revealed several in plete an event (Weinert and Hartwell, 1988). These surhuman cells as well (Table 1). The use of checkpointveillance systems are termed checkpoints and have defective mutants is a powerful technique for analyzing been given an empirical definition. When the occurrence cellular processes. Pleiotropic properties of checkpoint of an event B is dependent upon the completion of a genes, however, have limited genetic dissection of the prior event A, that dependence is due to a checkpoint pathways. For example, genes required for cell cycle if a loss-of-function mutation can be found that relieves arrest in response to DNA damage have been shown to the dependence (Hartwell and Weinert, 1989). An exambe required for DNA repair, apoptosis, and transcripple is the DNA damage checkpoint. Progression from tional induction. Some checkpoint genes are required G2 to M is dependent upon an intact genome (e.g. defor several different stages of arrest in the cell cycle, pendent upon the repair of any double strand breaks).and some are required for essential processes and must This dependence is eliminated by deletion of the RAD9 be studied either as special alleles or in the presence gene. The deletion phenotype reveals the presence of of suppressors. a DNA damage checkpoint, and the RAD9 gene is aThe DNA damage checkpoint acts at three stages in component of the checkpoint. In addition to the DNA the cell cycle, one at the G1/S transition, one that monidamage checkpoint (reviewed in Elledge, 1996), mitosis tors progression through S, and one at the G2/M boundis monitored by a spindle checkpoint that inhibits anaary (Table 1). Even though there are several arrest points phase progressio...

No abstract

Histone modifications, including H3 K56 acetylation, have been implicated in DNA damage tolerance. Here, we present evidence that Hst3 and Hst4, two paralogues of the histone deacetylase Sir2, target the cell cycle-regulated acetylation of H3 on K56 and are downregulated during DNA damage in a checkpoint-dependent manner. We show that Hst3 and Hst4 are themselves cell cycle regulated and that their misexpression affects H3 K56-Ac. Moreover, a histone H3 K56R mutation is epistatic to all phenotypes caused by HST3/4 deletion or HST3 overexpression, suggesting that H3K56-Ac is the major target of these histone deacetylases. On examining 18 members of the "Clb2 cluster" of cell cycle-regulated proteins to which Hst3 belongs, we find that two others, Ynl058c and Alk1, are significantly downregulated on DNA damage. Taken together, our data show that Hst3/Hst4 are negative regulators of H3 K56-Ac and that HST3 downregulation by a checkpoint-mediated transcriptional repression system is essential for surviving DNA damage.

The anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC) is an unusually complicated ubiquitin ligase, composed of 13 core subunits and either of two loosely associated regulatory subunits, Cdc20 and Cdh1. We analyzed the architecture of the APC using a recently constructed budding yeast strain that is viable in the absence of normally essential APC subunits. We found that the largest subunit, Apc1, serves as a scaffold that associates independently with two separable subcomplexes, one that contains Apc2 (Cullin), Apc11 (RING), and Doc1/Apc10, and another that contains the three TPR subunits (Cdc27, Cdc16, and Cdc23). We found that the three TPR subunits display a sequential binding dependency, with Cdc27 the most peripheral, Cdc23 the most internal, and Cdc16 between. Apc4, Apc5, Cdc23, and Apc1 associate interdependently, such that loss of any one subunit greatly reduces binding between the remaining three. Intriguingly, the cullin and TPR subunits both contribute to the binding of Cdh1 to the APC. Enzymatic assays performed with APC purified from strains lacking each of the essential subunits revealed that only cdc27⌬ complexes retain detectable activity in the presence of Cdh1. This residual activity depends on the C-box domain of Cdh1, but not on the C-terminal IR domain, suggesting that the C-box mediates a productive interaction with an APC subunit other than Cdc27. We have also found that the IR domain of Cdc20 is dispensable for viability, suggesting that Cdc20 can activate the APC through another domain. We have provided an updated model for the subunit architecture of the APC.[Keywords: APC; yeast; cullin; TPR; Cdh1; Cdc20] Supplemental material is available at http://genesdev.org.

Origins of replication are activated throughout S-phase such that some origins fire early and others fire late to ensure that each chromosome is completely replicated in a timely fashion. However, in response to DNA damage or replication fork stalling, eukaryotic cells block activation of unfired origins. Human cells derived from patients with ataxia telangiectasia are deficient in this process due to the lack of a functional ataxia-telegiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and elicit Radio-resistant DNA synthesis (RDS)1–3 following γ-irradiation2. This effect is conserved in budding yeast, as yeast cells lacking the related kinase Mec1 (ATR) also fail to inhibit DNA synthesis in the presence of DNA damage4. This intra-S-phase checkpoint actively regulates DNA synthesis by inhibiting the firing of late replicating origins, and this inhibition requires both Mec1 and the downstream checkpoint kinase Rad53 (Chk2)5,6. However, the Rad53 substrate(s) whose phosphorylation is required to mediate this function remained unknown. Here, we show that the replication initiation protein Sld3 is phosphorylated by Rad53, and that this phosphorylation, along with phosphorylation of the Cdc7 kinase regulatory subunit Dbf4, blocks late origin firing. Upon exposure to DNA damaging agents, cells expressing nonphosphorylatable alleles of SLD3 and DBF4 (SLD3-m25 and dbf4-m25, respectively) proceed through S-phase faster than wild-type cells by inappropriately firing late origins of replication. SLD3-m25 dbf4-m25 cells grow poorly in the presence of the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU) and accumulate multiple Rad52 foci. Moreover, SLD3-m25 dbf4-m25 cells are delayed in recovering from transient blocks to replication and subsequently arrest at the DNA damage checkpoint. These data suggest that the intra-S-phase checkpoint functions to block late origin firing in adverse conditions to prevent genomic instability and maximize cell survival.

Previous work on the DNA damage checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has shown that two complexes independently sense DNA lesions: the kinase Mec1-Ddc2 and the PCNA-like 9-1-1 complex. To test whether colocalization of these components is sufficient for checkpoint activation, we fused these checkpoint proteins to the LacI repressor and artificially colocalized these fusions by expressing them in cells harboring Lac operator arrays. We observed Rad53 and Rad9 phosphorylation, Sml1 degradation, and metaphase delay, demonstrating that colocalization of these sensors is sufficient to activate the checkpoint in the absence of DNA damage. Our tethering system allowed us to establish that CDK functions in the checkpoint pathway downstream of damage processing and checkpoint protein recruitment. This CDK dependence is likely, at least in part, through Rad9, since mutation of CDK consensus sites compromised its checkpoint function.