No abstract

Adjusted for stroke severity, patients who received general anesthesia for treatment are less likely to have a good outcome than those managed with local anesthesia. This may be due to preintervention risk not included in the stroke severity measures. Hypotension, more frequent in the general anesthesia patients, may also contribute.

Focal cerebral ischemia was induced in anesthetized macaque monkeys by unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion. The effect of blood volume expansion by a colloid agent and subsequent exsanguination to baseline cardiac output (CO) on local cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by the hydrogen clearance technique in both ischemic and nonischemic brain regions. Cardiac output was increased to maximum levels (159% +/- 92%, mean +/- standard error of the mean) by blood volume expansion with the colloid agent hetastarch, and was then reduced a similar amount (166% +/- 82%) by exsanguination during the ischemic period. Local CBF in ischemic brain regions varied directly with CO, with a correlation coefficient of 0.89 (% change CBF/% change CO), while CBF in nonischemic brain was not affected by upward or downward manipulations of CO. The difference in these responses between ischemic and nonischemic brain was highly significant (p less than 0.001). The results of this study show a profound loss of regulatory control in ischemic brain in response to alterations in CO, thereby suggesting that blood volume variations may cause significant changes in the intensity of ischemia. It is proposed that CO monitoring and manipulation may be vital for optimum care of patients with acute cerebral ischemia.

Background Patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke may require general anesthesia to undergo the procedure. At present, there is little clinical evidence to guide the choice of anesthetic in this acute setting. The clinical implications of experimental studies demonstrating anesthetic neuroprotection are poorly understood. Here, the authors evaluated the impact of anesthetic treatment on neurologic outcome in experimental stroke. Methods Controlled studies of anesthetics in stroke using the filament occlusion model were identified in electronic databases up to December 15, 2015. The primary outcome measures, infarct volume, and neurologic deficit score were used to calculate the normalized mean difference for each comparison. Meta-analysis of normalized mean difference values provided estimates of neuroprotection and contributions of predefined factors: study quality, the timing of treatment, and the duration of ischemia. Results In 80 retrieved publications anesthetic treatment reduced neurologic injury by 28% (95% CI, 24 to 32%; P < 0.0001). Internal validity was high: publication bias enhanced the effect size by 4% or less, effect size increased with study quality (P = 0.0004), and approximately 70% of studies were adequately powered. Apart from study quality, no predefined factor influenced neuroprotection. Neuroprotection failed in animals with comorbidities. Neuroprotection by anesthetics was associated with prosurvival mechanisms. Conclusions Anesthetic neuroprotection is a robust finding in studies using the filament occlusion model of ischemic stroke and should be assumed to influence outcomes in studies using this model. Neuroprotection failed in female animals and animals with comorbidities, suggesting that the results in young male animals may not reflect human stroke.