Members of the recently recognized SRC-1 family of transcriptional coactivators interact with steroid hormone receptors to enhance ligand-dependent transcription. AIB1, a member of the SRC-1 family, was cloned during a search on the long arm of chromosome 20 for genes whose expression and copy number were elevated in human breast cancers. AIB1 amplification and overexpression were observed in four of five estrogen receptor-positive breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. Subsequent evaluation of 105 unselected specimens of primary breast cancer found AIB1 amplification in approximately 10 percent and high expression in 64 percent of the primary tumors analyzed. AIB1 protein interacted with estrogen receptors in a ligand-dependent fashion, and transfection of AIB1 resulted in enhancement of estrogen-dependent transcription. These observations identify AIB1 as a nuclear receptor coactivator whose altered expression may contribute to development of steroid-dependent cancers.

The PAX3-FKHR fusion protein is present in a majority of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas associated with increased aggressiveness and poor prognosis. To better understand the molecular pathogenesis of PAX3-FKHR, we carried out the first, unbiased genome-wide identification of PAX3-FKHR binding sites and associated target genes in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The data shows that PAX3-FKHR binds to the same sites as PAX3 at both MYF5 and MYOD enhancers. The genome-wide analysis reveals that the PAX3-FKHR sites are (a) mostly distal to transcription start sites, (b) conserved, (c) enriched for PAX3 motifs, and (d) strongly associated with genes overexpressed in PAX3-FKHR-positive rhabdomyosarcoma cells and tumors. There is little evidence in our data set for PAX3-FKHR binding at the promoter sequences. The genome-wide analysis further illustrates a strong association between PAX3 and E-box motifs in these binding sites, suggestive of a common coregulation for many target genes. We also provide the first direct evidence that FGFR4 and IGF1R are the targets for PAX3-FKHR. The map of PAX3-FKHR binding sites provides a framework for understanding the pathogenic roles of PAX3-FKHR, as well as its molecular targets to allow a systematic evaluation of agents against this aggressive rhabdomyosarcoma.

Many transcription coactivators interact with nuclear receptors in a ligand-and C-terminal transactivation function (AF2)-dependent manner. We isolated a nuclear factor (designated ASC-2) with such properties by using the ligand-binding domain of retinoid X receptor as a bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening. ASC-2 also interacted with other nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptor, thyroid hormone receptor, estrogen receptor ␣, and glucocorticoid receptor, basal factors TFIIA and TBP, and transcription integrators CBP/p300 and SRC-1. In transient cotransfections, ASC-2, either alone or in conjunction with CBP/p300 and SRC-1, stimulated ligand-dependent transactivation by wild type nuclear receptors but not mutant receptors lacking the AF2 domain. Consistent with an idea that ASC-2 is essential for the nuclear receptor function in vivo, microinjection of anti-ASC-2 antibody abrogated the liganddependent transactivation of retinoic acid receptor, and this repression was fully relieved by coinjection of ASC-2-expression vector. Surprisingly, ASC-2 was identical to a gene previously identified during a search for genes amplified and overexpressed in breast and other human cancers. From these results, we concluded that ASC-2 is a bona fide transcription coactivator molecule of nuclear receptors, and its altered expression may contribute to the development of cancers.The nuclear receptor superfamily is a group of ligand-dependent transcriptional regulatory proteins that function by binding to specific DNA sequences named hormone response elements in the promoters of target genes (for a review, see Ref.1). The superfamily includes receptors for a variety of small hydrophobic ligands such as steroids, T3, 1 and retinoids as well as a large number of related proteins that do not have known ligands, referred to as orphan nuclear receptors (reviewed in Ref.2). Functional analysis of nuclear receptors has shown that there are two major activation domains. The activation function-2 (AF-2) at the extreme C-terminal region of the ligandbinding domain (LBD) exhibits ligand-dependent transactivation, whereas the N-terminal activation function-1 contains a ligand-independent transactivation domain. The AF-2 region is conserved among nuclear receptors, and deletion or point mutations in this region impair transcriptional activation without changing ligand and DNA binding affinities. X-ray crystallographic studies of the LBD of nuclear receptors revealed that the ligand binding induces a major conformational change in the AF-2 region (3-7), suggesting that this region may play a critical role in mediating transactivation by a ligand-dependent interaction with coactivators. As expected, many coactivators fail to interact with AF-2 mutants of nuclear receptors (8 -10). Transcriptional activation of most nuclear receptors involves at least two separate processes as follows: derepression and activation. Repression is mediated in part by interaction of unliganded receptors with corepressors such as N-CoR (11) and SMRT (12). H...

Many transcription coactivators interact with nuclear receptors in a ligandThe nuclear receptor superfamily is a group of proteins that regulate, in a ligand-dependent manner, transcriptional initiation of target genes by binding to specific DNA sequences named hormone response elements (reviewed in reference 23). Functional analysis of nuclear receptors has shown that there are two major activation domains. The N-terminal domain (AF1) contains a ligand-independent activation function, whereas the ligand-binding domain (LBD) exhibits ligand-dependent transactivation function (AF2). The AF2 core region, located at the extreme C terminus of the receptor LBDs, is conserved among nuclear receptors and undergoes a major conformational change upon ligand binding (23). This region has been shown to play a critical role in mediating transactivation by serving as a ligand-dependent interaction interface with many different coactivators (reviewed in reference 9). These coactivators, including the p160 family members (i.e., SRC-1, SRC-2/GRIP1/TIF2, and SRC-3/ACTR/pCIP/AIB1/ RAC3/TRAM1), CBP/p300, p/CAF, TRAP/DRIP, activating signal cointegrator 2 (ASC-2), and many others, bridge nuclear receptors and the basal transcription apparatus and/or remodel the chromatin structures (9).Chromatin, the physiological template of all eukaryotic genetic information, undergoes a diverse array of posttranslational modifications that largely impinge on histone amino termini, thereby regulating access to the underlying DNA (reviewed in reference 12). SRC-1 and the p160 family member ACTR, along with CBP and p300, were recently shown to contain histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activities and associate with yet another HAT protein, p/CAF (9). In contrast, SMRT and N-CoR, nuclear receptor corepressors, form complexes with Sin3 and histone deacetylase proteins (9). These results are consistent with the notion that the acetylation of histones destabilizes nucleosomes and relieves transcriptional repression by allowing transcription factors to access recognition elements, whereas deacetylation of the histones stabilizes the repressed state. More recently, the histone arginine methyltransferases CARM1 and PRMT1 were newly defined as transcriptional coactivators of nuclear receptors (4, 40). NSD1 and

The identification of tumor-suppressor genes in solid tumors by classical cancer genetics methods is difficult and slow. We combined nonsense-mediated RNA decay microarrays 1 and array-based comparative genomic hybridization 2,3 for the genome-wide identification of genes with biallelic inactivation involving nonsense mutations and loss of the wild-type allele. This approach enabled us to identify previously unknown mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase gene EPHB2. The DU 145 prostate cancer cell line, originating from a brain metastasis, carries a truncating mutation of EPHB2 and a deletion of the remaining allele. Additional frameshift, splice site, missense and nonsense mutations are present in clinical prostate cancer samples. Transfection of DU 145 cells, which lack functional EphB2, with wild-type EPHB2 suppresses clonogenic growth. Taken together with studies indicating that EphB2 may have an essential role in cell migration and maintenance of normal tissue architecture, our findings suggest that mutational inactivation of EPHB2 may be important in the progression and metastasis of prostate cancer.Inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs) in cancer is often a two-step process 4 involving mutation of the target gene and loss of the wild-type allele. Mapping of chromosomal deletions and losses of heterozygosity in cancer cells has been widely applied to guide the identification of TSGs. On its own, however, this approach is slow, labor-intensive and complicated by genomic instability, which often leads to numerous candidate regions for further study. In an alternative approach, the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) mechanism, which normally targets transcripts with nonsense mutations for rapid degradation 5,6 , is blocked to cause the differential stabilization of genes that contain truncating mutations. This approach, coupled with microarrays to measure transcript levels after NMD inhibition, has been proposed for the genome-wide identification of mutated genes in cell lines 1 .Here we combined results from NMD microarray experiments highlighting putative nonsense mutations with high-resolution data on deleted genomic regions in cancer cell lines obtained with arraybased comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) 2,3 . We applied this integrated approach, which focuses on biallelic gene inactivation events, to the identification of candidate TSGs in prostate cancer.We pretreated the DU 145, PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines with emetine (which inhibits the NMD pathway) and then exposed them to actinomycin D to block new mRNA synthesis and to distinguish post-transcriptional shifts in mRNA stability, which indicate the presence of a nonsense mutation. We used cDNA microarrays to measure changes in transcript levels in cells treated with emetine versus untreated cells. We also carried out corresponding analyses with nonmalignant control cells to distinguish drug-induced gene expression changes from mutation-induced transcript stabilization events. We used known nonsense mutations, including the C39X...

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive pediatric cancer of striated muscle characterized in 60% of cases by a t(2;13)(q35;q14). This results in the fusion of PAX3, a developmental transcription factor required for limb myogenesis, with FKHR, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors. The resultant PAX3-FKHR gene possesses transforming properties; however, the effects of this chimeric oncogene on gene expression are largely unknown. To investigate the actions of these transcription factors, both Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR were introduced into NIH 3T3 cells, and the resultant gene expression changes were analyzed with a murine cDNA microarray containing 2,225 elements. We found that PAX3-FKHR but not PAX3 activated a myogenic transcription program including the induction of transcription factors MyoD, Myogenin, Six1, and Slug as well as a battery of genes involved in several aspects of muscle function. Notable among this group were the growth factor gene Igf2 and its binding protein Igfbp5. Relevance of this model was suggested by verification that three of these genes (IGFBP5, HSIX1, and Slug) were also expressed in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. This study utilizes cDNA microarrays to elucidate the pattern of gene expression induced by an oncogenic transcription factor and demonstrates the profound myogenic properties of PAX3-FKHR in NIH 3T3 cells.

Exosomes are secreted membrane vesicles that have been proposed as an effective means to detect a variety of disease states, including cancer. The properties of exosomes, including stability in biological fluids, allow for their efficient isolation and make them an ideal vehicle for studies on early disease detection and evaluation. Much data has been collected over recent years regarding the messenger RNA, microRNA, and protein contents of exosomes. In addition, many studies have described the functional role that exosomes play in disease initiation and progression. Tumor cells have been shown to secrete exosomes, often in increased amounts compared to normal cells, and these exosomes can carry the genomic and proteomic signatures characteristic of the tumor cells from which they were derived. While these unique signatures make exosomes ideal for cancer detection, exosomes derived from cancer cells have also been shown to play a functional role in cancer progression. Here, we review the unique genomic and proteomic contents of exosomes originating from cancer cells as well as their functional effects to promote tumor progression.

The tetraspans are molecules with four transmembrane domains which are engaged in multimolecular complexes (the tetraspan web) containing a subset of beta1 integrins (in particular alpha3beta1, alpha4beta1 and alpha6beta1), MHC antigens and several unidentified molecules. The molecules associated with tetraspans are readily detected after immunoprecipitation performed in mild detergents such as Brij 97 or CHAPS. In this study we show that another classical mild detergent, digitonin, dissociated most of these associated molecules, including integrins, from the tetraspans CD9, CD37, CD53, CD63, CD82, Co-029, Talla-1 and NAG-2. In contrast, reciprocal immunoprecipitations from various cell lines demonstrated that two other tetraspans, CD81 and CD151, formed complexes with integrins not disrupted by digitonin. These complexes were CD81/alpha4beta1, CD151/alpha3beta1 and CD151/alpha6beta1. Furthermore, a new anti-CD151 monoclonal antibody (mAb), TS151r, was shown to have a restricted pattern of expression, inversely related to the sum of the levels of expression of alpha6beta1 and alpha3beta1. This mAb was unable to co-precipitate integrins in digitonin, suggesting that its epitope is blocked by the association with integrins. Indeed, the binding of TS151r to the cell surface was quantitatively diminished following alpha3beta1 overexpression. Altogether, these data suggest that, among tetraspans, CD81 interacts directly with the integrin alpha4beta1, and CD151 interacts directly with integrins alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1. Because all tetraspan-tetraspan associations are disrupted by digitonin, it is likely that the other tetraspans interact indirectly with integrins, through interactions with CD81 or CD151.