Summary Background The distinct somatic mutations that define clinical and histopathological heterogeneity in cutaneous melanoma could be dependent on host susceptibility to exogenous factors like ultraviolet radiation. Objectives Firstly, to characterize patients with cutaneous melanoma clinically and pathologically based on the mutational status of BRAF, NRAS and TERT promoter. Secondly, to elucidate the modified features due to the presence of TERT promoter mutations over the background of either BRAF or NRAS mutations. Methods We performed a retrospective study on 563 patients with melanoma by investigating somatic mutations in BRAF, NRAS and TERT promoter. Results We observed co‐occurrence of TERT promoter mutations with BRAF and NRAS mutations in 26.3% and 6.9% of melanomas, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed an independent association between BRAF mutations and a decreased presence of cutaneous lentigines at the melanoma site, and an increased association with the presence of any MC1R polymorphism. We also observed an independent association between TERT promoter mutations and increased tumour mitotic rate. Co‐occurrence of BRAF and TERT promoter mutations was independently associated with occurrence of primary tumours at usually sun‐exposed sites, lack of histological chronic sun damage in surrounding unaffected skin at the melanoma site, and increased tumour mitotic rate. Co‐occurrence of NRAS and TERT promoter mutations was independently associated with increased tumour mitotic rate. The presence of TERT promoter together with BRAF or NRAS mutations was associated with statistically significantly worse survival. Conclusions The presence of TERT promoter mutations discriminates BRAF‐ and NRAS‐mutated tumours and indicates a higher involvement of ultraviolet‐induced damage and tumours with worse melanoma‐specific survival than those without any mutation. These observations refine classification of patients with melanoma based on mutational status.

No abstract

The use of NGS in clinical practice for precision diagnosis requires a quality starting material. Despite the broadly established use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples in molecular testing, these usually have low-quality DNA. We established a method to determine the suitability of melanoma FFPE samples for an amplicon-based NGS custom panel analysis. DNA was extracted from unstained melanoma samples and wide local excision samples. Amplicon-based libraries were constructed and tested using time and quality parameters as variables. Time elapsed from sample retrieval >7 years, a quality control value > 5.63 and a DNA integrity value < 2.05 indicated samples were not suitable. A decision tree is provided with rate of samples suitable for analysis according to the combination of these parameters.

According to the divergent pathway model, cutaneous melanoma comprises a nevogenic group with a propensity to melanocyte proliferation and another one associated with cumulative solar damage (CSD). While characterized clinically and epidemiologically, the differences in the molecular profiles between the groups have remained primarily uninvestigated. This study has used a custom gene panel and bioinformatics tools to investigate the potential molecular differences in a thoroughly characterized cohort of 119 melanoma patients belonging to nevogenic and CSD groups. We found that the nevogenic melanomas had a restricted set of mutations, with the prominently mutated gene being BRAF. The CSD melanomas, in contrast, showed mutations in a diverse group of genes that included NF1, ROS1, GNA11, and RAC1. We thus provide evidence that nevogenic and CSD melanomas constitute different biological entities and highlight the need to explore new targeted therapies.