Abstract-When analyzing thousands of event histories, analysts often want to see the events as an aggregate to detect insights and generate new hypotheses about the data. An analysis tool must emphasize both the prevalence and the temporal ordering of these events. Additionally, the analysis tool must also support flexible comparisons to allow analysts to gather visual evidence. In a previsous work, we introduced align, rank, and filter (ARF) to accentuate temporal ordering. In this paper, we present temporal summaries, an interactive visualization technique that highlights the prevalence of event occurrences. Temporal summaries dynamically aggregate events in multiple granularities (year, month, week, day, hour, etc.) for the purpose of spotting trends over time and comparing several groups of records. They provide affordances for analysts to perform temporal range filters. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach in two extensive case studies with analysts who applied temporal summaries to search, filter, and look for patterns in electronic health records and academic records.

No abstract

Polyclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were developed for the detection of retrorsine (1, 351 g/mol), monocrotaline (2, 325 g/mol), and retronecine (3, 155 g/mol) in the parts per billion (ppb) range. A set of three bifunctional linking arms (6-8) was synthesized. By N-alkylation of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) retrorsine, monocrotaline, and retronecine acetonide (9), six haptens (6.1, 6.2, 7.1, 7.2, 7.9, and 8.9) were synthesized and used to generate rabbit antisera. The resulting anti-retrorsine antiserum gave a 50% inhibition (I50) value of 0.9 +/- 0.2 ppb for retrorsine with detection limits of 0.5-10 ppb. The same ELISA system also detected isatidine (4, retrorsine N-oxide) dihydrate (403 g/mol) with an I50 of 1 ppb and senecionine (5,352 g/mol) with an I50 of 100 ppb. A second monocrotaline-based ELISA detected monocrotaline with an I50 of 36 +/- 9 ppb 2 with detection limits of 5-500 ppb and shows no cross-reactivity with 1 or 5; this ELISA demonstrates the potential for the substrate-specific detection method. A third retronecine-based ELISA detects 3 with an I50 of 3000 +/- 600 ppb (3 +/- 0.6 ppm) and detection limits of 600-10,000 ppb. None of these ELISAs cross-react with the structurally similar swainsonine (10) or lupinine (11) alkaloids. PAs were detected in extracts of Senecio vulgaris and Crotalaria retusa, but not in Lupinus spp., as a demonstration of the ELISA's usefulness.

No abstract

No abstract