No abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy of tanezumab versus placebo for reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip.Methods. This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Patients with baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function subscale scores of >5 and >4, respectively, and patient's global assessment of OA as "fair," "poor," or "very poor" were treated at baseline and weeks 8 and 16. Coprimary efficacy end points were change from baseline to week 16 in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function subscales and patient's global assessment, analyzed using analysis of covariance. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout.Results. Patients (n ‫؍‬ 621) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to treatment with intravenous tanezumab 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg or placebo. Each tanezumab group showed significant improvement for the 3 coprimary end points versus placebo (P < 0.001 for all). AE incidence ranged from 55% to 58% across tanezumab groups versus 44% for placebo. Safety findings were similar to those previously reported. The tanezumab OA clinical program was temporarily placed on hold because of AEs leading to joint replacement. Total joint replacements were reported in 8 patients: 1 in the 10 mg, 2 in the 5 mg, 2 in the 2.5 mg, and 3 in the placebo group. A total of 9 joints were replaced (8 hips [7 index joints] and 1 shoulder).Conclusion. Our findings indicate that tanezumab provides superior pain relief and improvement in physical function and patient's global assessment versus placebo in patients with painful hip OA, and is generally well tolerated.

PurposeA pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate tanezumab efficacy and safety in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), including subgroup analyses of at-risk patients with diabetes, severe OA symptoms, and those aged ≥65 years.Patients and methodsData from phase III placebo-controlled clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee or hip were pooled to evaluate tanezumab efficacy (four trials) and safety (nine trials). Patients received intravenous tanezumab, tanezumab plus an oral NSAID (naproxen, celecoxib, or diclofenac), active comparator (naproxen, celecoxib, diclofenac, or oxycodone), or placebo. Efficacy assessments included change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores, Patient’s Global Assessment (PGA) of OA, and percentage of patients with ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% improvement in WOMAC pain. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) documentation and physical and neurologic examinations.ResultsTanezumab significantly improved all efficacy end points in the overall population. Efficacy in at-risk patient subgroups was similar to the overall population. Incidence of AEs was highest in the tanezumab plus NSAID group and lowest in the placebo group. Incidence of AEs in the tanezumab monotherapy and active comparator groups was similar. Overall incidence of AEs was similar across subgroups. AEs of abnormal peripheral sensation were more frequently reported in tanezumab-treated patients compared with placebo or active comparator. Patients receiving active comparator had a slightly higher incidence of AEs suggestive of postganglionic sympathetic dysfunction.ConclusionTanezumab consistently provided significant improvement of pain, physical function, and PGA in individuals with OA, including patients with diabetes, severe OA symptoms, or aged ≥65 years. No increased safety risk was observed in at-risk patient subgroups.Trial registrationNCT00733902, NCT00744471, NCT00830063, NCT00863304, NCT00809354, NCT00864097, NCT00863772, NCT01089725, NCT00985621.

No abstract