In recent years, crime scholars and practitioners have pointed to the potential benefits of focusing police crime prevention efforts on crime places. Research suggests that there is significant clustering of crime in small places or "hot spots." A number of researchers have argued that crime problems can be reduced more efficiently if police officers focused their attention to these deviant places. In this article, we update and improve upon a previously completed Campbell Collaboration systematic review of the effects of hot spots policing and crime. Meta-analyses were used to determine the size, direction, and statistical significance of the overall impact of hot spots policing strategies on crime. The results of our research suggests that hot spots policing generates small but noteworthy crime reductions, and these crime control benefits diffuse into areas immediately surrounding targeted crime hot spots. Our analyses find that problem-oriented policing interventions generate larger mean effect sizes when compared to interventions that simply increase levels of traditional police actions in crime hot spots. We also find Anthony A. Braga is a Professor in the School of Criminal Justice at Rutgers University and a Senior Research Fellow in the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management at Harvard University. Dr. Braga's research involves collaborating with criminal justice, social service, and communitybased organizations to address illegal access to firearms, reduce gang and group-involved violence, and control crime hot spots. His most recent book is Policing that only a small number of studies examine the impacts of hot spots policing on police-community relations. The extant research on this topic, however, suggests that community members have positive reactions to these focused policing actions.
More than a century of empirical research examines how neighborhoods' emergent properties influence a host of phenomena such as crime, poverty, health, civic engagement, immigration, and economic inequality (for a recent review, see Sampson 2012). These studies typically conceive of such neighborhood effects as influencing behavior through neighborhood characteristics (e.g., population heterogeneity, level of segregation, or economic disadvantage) or social processes (e.g., collective efficacy), or as spatial processes between neighborhoods (e.g., diffusion). Theoretically bundled within these neighborhood effects are the social networks of actors and institutions. In fact, the presence, vitality, and stability of neighborhood social networks are often at the Abstract Nearly a century of empirical research examines how neighborhood properties influence a host of phenomena such as crime, poverty, health, civic engagement, immigration, and economic inequality. Theoretically bundled within these neighborhood effects are institutions' and actors' social networks that are the foundation of other neighborhood-level processes such as social control, mobilization, and cultural assimilation. Yet, despite such long-standing theoretical links between neighborhoods and social networks, empirical research rarely considers or measures dimensions of geography and social network mechanisms simultaneously. The present study seeks to fill this gap by analyzing how both geography and social networks influence an important social problem in urban America: gang violence. Using detailed data on fatal and non-fatal shootings, we examine effects of geographic proximity, organizational memory, and additional group processes (e.g., reciprocity, transitivity, and status seeking) on gang violence in Chicago and Boston. Results show adjacency of gang turf and prior conflict between gangs are strong predictors of subsequent gang violence. Furthermore, important network processes, including reciprocity and status seeking, also contribute to observed patterns of gang violence. In fact, we find that these spatial and network processes mediate racial effects, suggesting the primacy of place and the group in generating gang violence.
Potential conflicts of interestWith colleagues, Braga has conducted two randomized controlled experiments and one quasi-experimental evaluation that found hot spots policing to be effective in controlling crime and disorder problems. Moreover, his colleagues (e.g., David Weisburd and Lorraine Mazerolle) have conducted other experimental evaluations of the effects of hot spots policing on crime. Although Braga doesn't have an ideological bias towards the effectiveness of place-focused interventions, it may be uncomfortable for him to report findings in this review that contradict the findings of his experiment or experiments conducted by his colleagues.Papachristos and Hureau have collaborated with Braga on an evaluation of the effects of hot spots policing program in Boston. Beyond that single study, neither Papachristos nor Hureau has been involved in evaluating hot spots policing interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.