No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

minors of R ; A [ [ R ; p t ] is the Mcl\Iillan degree of the pole pn of R and IVote Added in Proof: Recent work shows that condition (9) rea [ R ] = ~~= l A I R ; p k ] [24]. quires that the return difference I + F&(s) not have a zero of Corollary 1: Let (?be defined by (3) and let L Y~ be defined by Fact 3. transmission at, P, = 1 7 % ' ' . J 1271. Under these conditions, for any k E { 1, 2,. . .,l] for which Re P k > 0, REFEREXCES det X k ( p s ) # 0 if and only if where in the triangular Hankel matrix, t.he Rka's are the coefficient matrices of R k defined by (4). Proof: From (17) and (19)-(20),m ) l ; hence and for any integer Bk > -,t lim (spk)'*det [I + F&(s)] = 0. Hence, by Lemma 2, (9) is true if and only if Q[det [ I f Fk] : p k ] = 7s. Let [ A , B, C , 01 be any minimal realization of the strictly proper element R of CnXn(s) defined by (15); then, because of the coprime factorization (16), det D ( s ) = c det (SI --4) [lti], [20]. S o a d e t (SI - 0). 1 : is still valid for poles on the boundary (i.e., Re pk = 0) whenever Gp(s) is meromorphic in a neighborhood of such p s . This will always be the case for differential delay systems.

No abstract

ISR develops, applies and teaches advanced methodologies of design and analysis to AbstractSimulation by time discretizations can be qualitatively misleading; as counterexamples a class of non-controllable single-input two-dimensional bilinear control systems is presented whose Euler discretizations are controllable on the punctured plane.

No abstract

No abstract