This first overview of large-scale rock slope failure (RSF) in the Pyrenees addresses the eastern third of the range. Around 30 principal RSFs >0.25 km 2 and 20 lesser or uncertain cases have been identified from remote imagery and groundtruthing. Compared with other European mountain ranges, RSF incidence is relatively sparse, displays no obvious regional trend or spatial clustering, and occurs across diverse landscape types, if mainly on metamorphic rocks. A transition is observed from paraglacial RSFs in formerly-glaciated valleys to what are here termed 'parafluvial' RSFs, within wholly or mainly fluvial valleys but where slope failure is not directly provoked by or linked to river erosion. RSFs are particularly found in three topographic settings: (i) at cirque and trough-head thresholds (transition zones of elevated instability between cirque and main glaciated trough walls); (ii) near the upper or outer periphery of the ice field, where glacial adaptation of fluvial valleys is incomplete; and (iii) in fluvial valleys beyond glacial limits where incision is locally intense. RSF is absent from the range divide, from within cirques, and from most main valleys. In the montane areas, RSF is strongly associated with vestiges of preglacial summit surfaces, confirming that plateau ridges are less stable than sharpened crests and horns. RSF is contributing significantly to the progressive destruction of this paleic relief. The overall sparsity of RSF indicates insufficient rock mass stresses, including rebound after concentrated bedrock erosion. This may reflect a relatively weak imprint of glacial erosion, including breaching, in a context of relatively low mean rates of neotectonic uplift, possibly signalling overall that eastern Pyrenees landscapes are close to dynamic equilibrium.
Rock slope failure (RSF) generates the largest single erosional events in the glacial–paraglacial land system, leaving numerous obvious cavities and less obviously weakened valley walls. Its contribution to trough widening in a mountain range has not previously been systematically quantified. Map-based measures of RSF ‘depth of bite’ are applied to five sample areas in the Scottish Highlands, and a comparator area in north Norway, all in metasediments structurally conducive to mass deformation and block sliding. Problems in applying map-based measures include bedrock cavities remaining partially occupied by failed debris or subsequent infill, and multiple planes of reference. The most practical measure is of maximum recess depth on any single contour (DMAX). This is a standardizable single-point indicator of visible impact, not a measure of actual cavity depth, nor an average applying to the whole RSF. In four of the five areas, average DMAX is consistent at 40–45 m. RSF breadth averages 270–600 m over the five areas. RSF affects 9% and 14% of total valley wall length in the two densest RSF areas, rising to 47% and 52% on two specific valley sides. The depth:breadth ratio in areas dominated by slope deformation can be twice that in areas of translational sliding. An evolutionary model of glacial–paraglacial cycling proposes a ‘zone of paraglacial relaxation’ in which RSF is intense in early cycles as fluvial profiles adjust to ice discharge, diminishing with maturity as trough walls become stress-hardened, and reviving in response to neotectonic and glaciological perturbations, notably ice piracy via transfluent breaching. However, a major unknown is the efficacy of glacial exploitation of RSFs: if it takes several cycles to evacuate debris and pare back cavity angles, cumulative RSF impact is lessened. Glacial–paraglacial cycling is a classic positive feedback loop, promoting valley widening beyond the parabolic norm. Preferential exploitation of structure by RSF promotes asymmetrical trough profiles. RSF acts both as a scarp retreat process, and as a slope reduction counterpoint to glacial slope steepening. In landscape evolution, it is a powerful agent in destruction of paleic relief, notably around watersheds that are undergoing breaching by transfluent ice, where trough development and widening is still vigorous.
Paraglacial rock slope failure (RSF) is here studied as a locally major contributor to mountain landscape evolution in the Caledonian ranges. Dense RSF clusters exist in Scotland and Norway, but overall RSF distribution in Scandinavia is poorly known. In the Abisko area, air photo scrutiny confirms the reported incidence of sparse but significant RSF. In the Kärkevagge complex, the Rissa RSF is one of the largest in northern Europe, with a scar volume of 42 Mm3. The well–known Giant Boulder Deposit (GBD) is a rock avalanche emanating from the Rissa RSF scar, the interpretation of wholesale valley wall retreat at deglaciation being discounted. In the adjacent valley of Vassivagge, a major RSF on Vuoitasrita has a similar area and morpholocation, but lacks a GBD. It has consumed 5–10% of the relict preglacial mountain surface. Both RSFs are near incipient watershed breaches in valleys which may have undergone vigorous enlargement during the last stadial. Glaciation history may explain spatial incidence as well as neotectonic and other triggers. The localised geomorphic impact of RSF in the Abisko mountains is high by comparison with contemporary slope processes. The cumulative impact of paraglacial RSF over the Quaternary may have been considerable, and RSF may be an indicator of concentrated late–stage glacial erosion.
A cluster of exceptionally large sediment fans occurs in Val Venosta, a glacial trough in the east-central Alps, Italy. Its 59 tributary valleys generate 49 fans with volume:catchment area ratios varying across four orders of magnitude. Geomorphological and statistical analysis distinguish ‘allometric’ and ‘anomalous’ fans. Catastrophic massive slope failure origins are suggested for the anomalous cases. They comprise ‘outsize fans’ and ‘megafans’, the latter attaining 400 m cone height and 2700 m radius, and dominating the trough. Above most fans, evidence is found for source cavities of comparable volume. Reconstruction of the missing sides and heads of two tributary valleys reveals lost mountains 700 m deep. They are credible sources for the Malser Haide, a globally significant 11 km-long megafan with an estimated volume of 1650 Mm3, and the St Valentin outsize fans. Generally, anomalous fans occur where landslides are funnelled, comminuted and controlled through ‘debouchures’ high enough above the trough floor for conoidal deposition. Although sedimentological data are sparse, these fans may represent a new category of catastrophic slope failure outcome, mimicking conventional sediment fans of incremental origin. The Val Venosta cluster is the largest in the Alps, with concentrated glacial erosion in conducive geology among the possible factors explaining anomalous fan incidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.