The compaction of genomic DNA into chromatin has profound implications for the regulation of key processes such as transcription, replication and DNA repair. Nucleosomes, the repeating building blocks of chromatin, vary in the composition of their histone protein components. This is the result of the incorporation of variant histones and post-translational modifications of histone amino acid side chains. The resulting changes in nucleosome structure, stability and dynamics affect the compaction of nucleosomal arrays into higher-order structures. It is becoming clear that chromatin structures are not nearly as uniform and regular as previously assumed. This implies that chromatin structure must also be viewed in the context of specific biological functions.

Histone variants are non-allelic protein isoforms that play key roles in diversifying chromatin structure. The known number of such variants has greatly increased in recent years, but the lack of naming conventions for them has led to a variety of naming styles, multiple synonyms and misleading homographs that obscure variant relationships and complicate database searches. We propose here a unified nomenclature for variants of all five classes of histones that uses consistent but flexible naming conventions to produce names that are informative and readily searchable. The nomenclature builds on historical usage and incorporates phylogenetic relationships, which are strong predictors of structure and function. A key feature is the consistent use of punctuation to represent phylogenetic divergence, making explicit the relationships among variant subtypes that have previously been implicit or unclear. We recommend that by default new histone variants be named with organism-specific paralog-number suffixes that lack phylogenetic implication, while letter suffixes be reserved for structurally distinct clades of variants. For clarity and searchability, we encourage the use of descriptors that are separate from the phylogeny-based variant name to indicate developmental and other properties of variants that may be independent of structure.

Fundamental to the process of mammalian development is the timed and coordinated regulation of gene expression. This requires transcription of a precise subset of the total complement of genes. It is clear that chromatin architecture plays a fundamental role in this process by either facilitating or restricting transcription factor binding [1]. How such specialized chromatin structures are established to regulate gene expression is poorly understood. All eukaryotic organisms contain specialized histone variants with distinctly different amino acid sequences that are even more conserved than the major core histones [2]. On the basis of their highly conserved sequence, histone variants have been assumed critical for the function of mammalian chromatin; however, a requirement for a histone variant has not been shown in mammalian cells. Mice with a deletion of H1 degrees have been generated by gene targeting in ES cells, but these mice show no phenotypic consequences, perhaps due to redundancy of function [3]. Here we show for the first time that a mammalian histone variant, H2A.Z, plays a critical role in early development, and we conclude that this histone variant plays a pivotal role in establishing the chromatin structures required for the complex patterns of gene expression essential for normal mammalian development.

Controlling the degree of higher order chromatin folding is a key element in partitioning the metazoan genome into functionally distinct chromosomal domains. However, the mechanism of this fundamental process is poorly understood. Our recent studies suggested that the essential histone variant H2A.Z and the silencing protein HP1alpha may function together to establish a specialized conformation at constitutive heterochromatic domains. We demonstrate here that HP1alpha is a unique chromatin binding protein. It prefers to bind to condensed higher order chromatin structures and alters the chromatin-folding pathway in a novel way to locally compact individual chromatin fibers without crosslinking them. Strikingly, both of these features are enhanced by an altered nucleosomal surface created by H2A.Z (the acidic patch). This shows that the surface of the nucleosome can regulate the formation of distinct higher order chromatin structures mediated by an architectural chromatin binding protein.

Despite progress in understanding chromatin function, the structure of the 30 nm chromatin fiber has remained elusive. However, with the recent crystal structure of a short tetranucleosomal array, the 30 nm fiber is beginning to come into view.

Nucleosomes are highly dynamic macromolecular complexes that are assembled and disassembled in a modular fashion. One important way in which this dynamic process can be modulated is by the replacement of major histones with their variants, thereby affecting nucleosome structure and function. Here we use fluorescence resonance energy transfer between fluorophores attached to various defined locations within the nucleosome to dissect and compare the structural transitions of a H2A.Z containing and a canonical nucleosome in response to increasing ionic strength. We show that the peripheral regions of the DNA dissociate from the surface of the histone octamer at relatively low ionic strength, under conditions where the dimer-tetramer interaction remains unaffected. At around 550 mM NaCl, the (H2A-H2B) dimer dissociates from the (H3-H4) 2 tetramer-DNA complex. Significantly, this latter transition is stabilized in nucleosomes that have been reconstituted with the essential histone variant H2A.Z. Our studies firmly establish fluorescence resonance energy transfer as a valid method to study nucleosome stability, and shed new light on the biological function of H2A.Z.Chromatin is built from nucleosomes, the universally repeating protein-DNA complexes in all eukaryotic cells. The crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle (NCP) 1 (1) reveals an octameric histone core around which 147 base pairs of DNA are wrapped in 1.65 tight superhelical turns. The histone octamer itself is a modular assembly of two copies each of the four histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Two histone pairs, composed either of H2A and H2B, or H3 and H4, form stable heterodimers. In solution, two H3-H4 dimers form a tetramer in the shape of a flat, twisted horseshoe that binds the central 60 base pairs of the nucleosomal DNA around its outside (1, 2). One (H2A-H2B) dimer is tethered to each face of the (H3-H4) 2 tetramer-DNA complex, to complete a "helical ramp" for continued DNA binding (reviewed in Ref.3).The interaction between the two histone subcomplexes occurs via two spatially distinct interaction interfaces of quite different character (Fig. 1). A four-helix bundle structure (formed by H2B and H4) is characterized mainly by hydrophobic interactions, and buries 1000 Å 2 (1). The second, larger interface (1600 Å 2 ) is characterized mostly by direct and solvent-mediated hydrogen bonds between the "docking domain" of H2A, and the histone fold extensions of H3 and H4 (4). In addition, a small interface is formed between the L1 loops of the two H2A molecules, which may contribute to holding together the two gyres of the DNA superhelix at the back of the nucleosome (Fig. 1) (5). Under physiological conditions, the (H2A-H2B) dimer associates stably with the (H3-H4) 2 tetramer only in the presence of DNA (6). Each (H2A-H2B) dimer organizes 30 base pairs toward either end of the DNA. The penultimate 10 base pairs of nucleosomal DNA on either side are organized by a region of H3 that does not form an integral part of the (H3-H4) 2 tetramer, an...

No abstract

H2A.Bbd is an unusual histone variant whose sequence is only 48% conserved compared to major H2A. The major sequence differences are in the docking domain that tethers the H2A-H2B dimer to the (H3-H4) 2 tetramer; in addition, the C-terminal tail is absent in H2A.Bbd. We assembled nucleosomes in which H2A is replaced by H2A.Bbd (Bbd-NCP), and found that Bbd-NCP had a more relaxed structure in which only 11872 bp of DNA is protected against digestion with micrococcal nuclease. The absence of fluorescence resonance energy transfer between the ends of the DNA in Bbd-NCP indicates that the distance between the DNA ends is increased significantly. The Bbd docking domain is largely responsible for this behavior, as shown by domain-swap experiments. Bbd-containing nucleosomal arrays repress transcription from a natural promoter, and this repression can be alleviated by transcriptional activators Tax and CREB. The structural properties of Bbd-NCP described here have important implications for the in vivo function of this histone variant and are consistent with its proposed role in transcriptionally active chromatin.