Biomedical research is being transformed through the application of information technologies that allow ever greater amounts of data to be shared on an unprecedented scale. However, the methods for involving participants have not kept pace with changes in research capability. In an era when information is shared digitally at the global level, mechanisms of informed consent remain static, paper-based and organised around national boundaries and legal frameworks. Dynamic consent (DC) is both a specific project and a wider concept that offers a new approach to consent; one designed to meet the needs of the twenty-first century research landscape. At the heart of DC is a personalised, digital communication interface that connects researchers and participants, placing participants at the heart of decision making. The interface facilitates two-way communication to stimulate a more engaged, informed and scientifically literate participant population where individuals can tailor and manage their own consent preferences. The technical architecture of DC includes components that can securely encrypt sensitive data and allow participant consent preferences to travel with their data and samples when they are shared with third parties. In addition to improving transparency and public trust, this system benefits researchers by streamlining recruitment and enabling more efficient participant recontact. DC has mainly been developed in biobanking contexts, but it also has potential application in other domains for a variety of purposes.
Advances in computing technology and bioinformatics mean that medical research is increasingly characterized by large international consortia of researchers that are reliant on large data sets and biobanks. These trends raise a number of challenges for obtaining consent, protecting participant privacy concerns and maintaining public trust. Participant-centred initiatives (PCIs) use social media technologies to address these immediate concerns, but they also provide the basis for long-term interactive partnerships. Here, we give an overview of this rapidly moving field by providing an analysis of the different PCI approaches, as well as the benefits and challenges of implementing PCIs.
BackgroundElectronic health records are widely acknowledged to provide an important opportunity to anonymize patient-level health care data and collate across populations to support research. Nonetheless, in the wake of public and policy concerns about security and inappropriate use of data, conventional approaches toward data governance may no longer be sufficient to respect and protect individual privacy. One proposed solution to improve transparency and public trust is known as Dynamic Consent, which uses information technology to facilitate a more explicit and accessible opportunity to opt out. In this case, patients can tailor preferences about whom they share their data with and can change their preferences reliably at any time. Furthermore, electronic systems provide opportunities for informing patients about data recipients and the results of research to which their data have contributed.ObjectiveTo explore patient perspectives on the use of anonymized health care data for research purposes. To evaluate patient perceptions of a Dynamic Consent model and electronic system to enable and implement ongoing communication and collaboration between patients and researchers.MethodsA total of 26 qualitative interviews and three focus groups were conducted that included a video presentation explaining the reuse of anonymized electronic patient records for research. Slides and tablet devices were used to introduce the Dynamic Consent system for discussion. A total of 35 patients with chronic rheumatic disease with varying levels of illness and social deprivation were recruited from a rheumatology outpatient clinic; 5 participants were recruited from a patient and public involvement health research network.ResultsPatients were supportive of sharing their anonymized electronic patient record for research, but noted a lack of transparency and awareness around the use of data, making it difficult to secure public trust. While there were general concerns about detrimental consequences of data falling into the wrong hands, such as insurance companies, 39 out of 40 (98%) participants generally considered that the altruistic benefits of sharing health care data outweighed the risks. Views were mostly positive about the use of an electronic interface to enable greater control over consent choices, although some patients were happy to share their data without further engagement. Participants were particularly enthusiastic about the system as a means of enabling feedback regarding data recipients and associated research results, noting that this would improve trust and public engagement in research. This underlines the importance of patient and public involvement and engagement throughout the research process, including the reuse of anonymized health care data for research. More than half of patients found the touch screen interface easy to use, although a significant minority, especially those with limited access to technology, expressed some trepidation and felt they may need support to use the system.ConclusionsPatients fro...
With one million people treated every 36 hours, routinely collected UK National Health Service (NHS) health data has huge potential for medical research. Advances in data acquisition from electronic patient records (EPRs) means such data are increasingly digital and can be anonymised for research purposes. NHS England’s care.data initiative recently sought to increase the amount and availability of such data. However, controversy and uncertainty following the care.data public awareness campaign led to a delay in rollout, indicating that the success of EPR data for medical research may be threatened by a loss of patient and public trust. The sharing of sensitive health care data can only be done through maintaining such trust in a constantly evolving ethicolegal and political landscape. We propose that a dynamic consent model, whereby patients can electronically control consent through time and receive information about the uses of their data, provides a transparent, flexible, and user-friendly means to maintain public trust. This could leverage the huge potential of the EPR for medical research and, ultimately, patient and societal benefit.
This manuscript details recent studies ofocular effects ofpulsed and cw laser radiation at wavelengths of I .3 15 and 1.3 1 8 jsm, and compares comeal, lens and retinal damage thresholds. The results indicate that for the exposure conditions studied, relatively minor changes in pulsewidth and/or wavelength can substantially alter threshold levels and change the tissue site(s) exhibiting the lowest damage threshold. The discussion suggests that these data may be applied to re-assess laser safety standards in the near-a to far-IR transition-region. Also discussed are unique aspects ofthe laser-tissue interaction for these penefrating wavelengths where the incident laser radiation is relatively evenly absorbed throughout the ocular medium and the retina. In such cases of "volurnefric" absorption obsewable manifestations of laser insult may be delayed (hours to days) and may ultimately involve inflammatory responses or other disruption oftissue not directly irradiated by the laser.
Excised bovine eyes are used as models for threshold determination of 532-nm laser-induced thermal damage of the retina in the pulse duration regime of 100 micros to 2 s for varying laser spot size diameters. The thresholds as determined by fluorescence viability staining compare well with the prediction of an extended Thompson-Gerstman computer model. Both models compare well with published Rhesus monkey threshold data. A previously unknown variation of the spot size dependence is seen for different pulse durations, which allows for a more complete understanding of the retinal thermal damage. Current International Commission on Nonionized Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), American National Standards Institute (ANS), and International Electromechanical Commission (IEC) laser and incoherent optical radiation exposure limits can be increased for extended sources for pulsed exposures. We conclude that the damage mechanism at threshold detected at 24 and 1 h for the nonhuman primate model is retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell damage and not thermal coagulation of the sensory retina. This work validates the bovine ex vivo and computer models for prediction of thresholds of thermally induced damage in the time domain of 10 micros to 2 s, which provides the basis for safety analysis of more complicated retinal exposure scenarios such as repetitive pulses, nonconstant retinal irradiance profiles, and scanned exposure.
Ocular damage threshold data remain sparse in the continuous wave (CW), near-infrared (NIR) radiation region save for the 1300-nm area that has been investigated in the past several decades. The 1300-nm ocular damage data have yielded unusual characteristics where CW retinal damage was observed in rabbit models, but never in nonhuman primate models. This paper reviews the existing 1300-nm ocular damage threshold data in terms of the fundamental criteria of an action spectrum to assist in explaining laser-tissue effects from near-infrared radiation in the eye. Reviewing the action spectrum criteria and existing NIR retinal lesion data lend evidence toward the significant presence of thermal lensing in ocular media affecting damage, a relatively unexplored mechanism of laser-tissue interaction.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)AFRL/HEDO ABSTRACTThis report summarizes the results of a series of IR laser-induced ocular damage studies conducted over the past decade. The studies examined retinal, lens, and corneal effects of laser exposures in the near-IR to far-IR transition region (wavelengths from 1.3-1.4 m with exposure durations ranging from Q-switched to cw). The corneal and retinal damage thresholds are tabulated for all pulsewidth regimes and the wavelength dependence of the IR thresholds is discussed and contrasted to laser safety standard maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits. The analysis suggests that the current laser standard MPEs could be beneficially revised to: (1) relax the IR MPEs over wavelength ranges where unusually high safety margins may unintentionally hinder applications of recently developed military and telecommunications laser systems; (2) replace step-function discontinuities in the IR MPEs by continuously varying analytical functions of wavelength and pulsewidth which more closely follow the trends of the experimental retinal and corneal ED 50 threshold data; and (3) result in an overall simplification of the safety standard MPEs over the wavelength range from 1.2 m to 2.6 m. A specific proposal for amending the IR MPEs over this wavelength range is presented. SUBJECT TERMS AbstractThis report summarizes the results of a series of IR laser-induced ocular damage studies conducted over the past decade. The studies examined retinal, lens, and corneal effects of laser exposures in the near-IR to far-IR transition region (wavelengths from 1.3-1.4 μm with exposure durations ranging from Q-switched to cw). The corneal and retinal damage thresholds are tabulated for all pulsewidth regimes and the wavelength dependence of the IR thresholds is discussed and contrasted to laser safety standard maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits. The analysis suggests that the current laser standard MPEs could be beneficially revised to: (1) relax the IR MPEs over wavelength ranges where unusually high safety margins may unintentionally hinder applications of recently developed military and telecommunications laser systems; (2) replace step-function discontinuities in the IR MPEs by continuously varying analytical functions of wavelength and pulsewidth which more closely follow the trends of the experimental retinal and corneal ED 50 threshold data; and (3) result in an overall simplification of the safety standard MPEs ove...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.