On the evening of 18 July 2004, several tornadoes occurred with two supercell thunderstorms over eastern North Dakota. The second and smaller in diameter of these storms produced an F4 tornado in an environment with lifting condensation level (LCL) heights that were atypically high according to recent statistical studies about supercell tornado environments. Surface dewpoints were also underforecast by computer models. These two issues are examined in this paper, which provides an overview of this event. The synoptic setting and environment characteristics suggest that evapotranspiration (ET) was responsible in part for enhancing surface moisture. It is likely that ET affected instability and convection initiation. This study also found that the presence of steep low-level lapse rates juxtaposed with low-level convective available potential energy along a surface trough may have contributed to tornado development in a high LCL environment where wind and instability characteristics were otherwise favorable for supporting supercell tornadoes.
Edwards and Thompson have made comprehensive and thorough comments concerning the methods, accuracy, and results in a case study by Kellenbenz et al. These comments questioned the representativeness of model-derived soundings and graphics used, as well as the modification methods employed with soundings presented in the 18 July 2004 case study. Other issues included the application of previous database studies to lifting condensation level (LCL) values found in the 18 July 2004 examination, as well as a focus that emphasized a single tornadic storm. In this response, the authors address problems and oversights with the 18 July 2004 case study, using new data to conduct a reanalysis of the environment on that evening. Additionally, a large independent database of Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) analysis soundings associated with supercell tornadoes is used to provide the context from which to carefully evaluate LCL results from the 18 July 2004 case relative to significant and violent tornadoes. Results indicate that although the LCL height associated with the F4 tornadic supercell in the original case study was probably overestimated, the background LCL environment was still unusually high for a violent tornado. New material presented in this response reinforces the conclusion that, when LCL heights are at the far upper end of empirical study distributions associated with significant tornadoes, undue weight should not be given to LCL as a tornado probability reduction factor when CAPE-storm relative helicity (SRH) combinations and deep-layer shear are also strong.Corresponding author address: Jonathan M. Davies, 9101 Alpha Ridge Rd.,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.