Item nonresponse in surveys is usually treated by some form of single imputation. In practice, the survey variable subject to missing values may exhibit a large number of zero-valued observations. In this paper, we propose multiply robust imputation procedures for treating this type of variable. Our procedures may be based on multiple imputation models and/or multiple nonresponse models. An imputation procedure is said to be multiply robust if the resulting estimator is consistent when all models but one are misspecified. The variance of the imputed estimators is estimated through a generalized jackknife variance estimation procedure. Results from a simulation study suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in terms of bias, efficiency and coverage rate.
This paper explores the problem of the construction of imputation classes using the score method, sometimes called predictive mean stratification or response propensity stratification, depending on the context. This method was studied in Thomsen (1973), Little (1986) and Eltinge & Yansaneh (1997). We use a different framework to evaluate the properties of the resulting imputed estimator of a population mean. In our framework, we condition on the realized sample. This enables us to considerably simplify our theoretical developments in the frequent situation where the boundaries and the number of classes are sample-dependent. We find that the key factor for reducing the non-response bias is to form classes homogeneous with respect to the response probabilities and/or the conditional expectation of the variable of interest. In the latter case, the non-response/imputation variance is also reduced. Finally, we performed a simulation study to fully evaluate various versions of the score method and to compare them with a cross-classification method, which is frequently used in practice. The results showed the superiority of the score method in general. Copyright 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2007 International Statistical Institute.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.