Objective To investigate the effect of using a routine ultrasound estimate of gestational age and maternal weight adjustment on maternal serum alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP), unconjugated oestriol (uE3) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Design Women with a singleton pregnancy without Down's syndrome were screened using the three serum markers and an estimate of gestational age based on ‘dates’ (time since first day of the last menstrual period) and one based on an ultrasound scan examination was recorded together with maternal weight. Setting Women attending the Homerton Hospital, Hackney, for their antenatal care between February 1989 and January 1990. Subjects 2113 women with a singleton pregnancy without Down's syndrome. Results The use of ultrasound to estimate gestational age (usually based on the biparietal diameter of the fetal skull) led to a significant reduction in the variance of each marker at a given week of pregnancy. The level of each marker was negatively associated with maternal weight, so that adjustment for weight also led to a reduction in variance. These data on gestational age and maternal weight, taken together with published data on pregnancies associated with Down's syndrome, indicate that the routine use of ultrasound to estimate gestational age will increase the detection rate from 58% to 67% while maintaining the false‐positive rate at 5%, or reduce the false‐positive rate from 5.7% to 3.1% while maintaining the detection rate at 60%. Routine maternal weight adjustment for the serum marker levels was much less useful, increasing the detection rate by about 0.5% for a given false‐positive rate, or reducing the false‐positive rate about 0.1% for a given detection rate. Conclusion An ultrasound gestational age estimate available at the time of Down's syndrome screening confers a substantial advantage to screening performance with a further small benefit resulting from maternal weight adjustment, which is worth adopting if it can be done without difficulty or extra cost.

yields an estimate of 204-8 affected pregnancies at the time of amnio-centesis (157.74 1-0.231). This is 32% less than the number at CVS ([302-204.8]/302). References 1 Macintosh MCM, Wald NJ, Chard T, Hansen J, Mikkelsen M, Therkelsen AJ, Petersen GB, Lundsteen C. The selective miscarriage of Down's syndrome from 10 weeks of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecoll995; 102: 798-801.

Compared with obese hypertensive patients, cardiovascular properties in lean hypertensive patients are more dependent on catecholamines and the renin system. The different neuroendocrine responses to dynamic stimuli in lean and obese patients also might help to explain the disparity in their cardiovascular outcomes.

The value of measuring the separate sub-units of human chorionic gonadotrophin (free alpha-hCG and free beta-hCG) instead of total hCG together with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and unconjugated oestriol (uE3) was examined to determine the effect on the performance of serum screening for Down's syndrome between 15 and 22 weeks of pregnancy. The study was based on stored serum samples relating to 75 singleton pregnancies with fetal Down's syndrome and 367 unaffected singleton pregnancies, matched for maternal age, gestational age, and duration of storage of the serum sample, supplemented by data from 970 white women with unaffected pregnancies. Using the four serum markers AFP, uE3, free beta-hCG, and free alpha-hCG, in addition to maternal age, 65 per cent of Down's syndrome pregnancies were detected for a 5 per cent false-positive rate compared with 59 per cent with the conventional triple test (AFP, uE3, total hCG with maternal age). If gestation was based on an ultrasound scan examination, the detection rate was 72 per cent using the four serum markers compared with 67 per cent with the triple test. As an alternative illustration, if the detection rate was kept at 60 per cent and gestation was estimated by an ultrasound scan examination the four-marker test reduced the false-positive rate by one-third from 3 per cent using the triple test to 2 per cent with the four-marker test. Screening performance was hardly affected by adjusting marker levels for maternal weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)