CD34+ precursors in normal human bone marrow (BM) generate large numbers of dendritic cells alongside macrophages and granulocytic precursors when cultured for 12 to 14 days in c-kit ligand, granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). This study reports an intermediate cell type that develops by day 6, and has the potential to differentiate into either macrophages or dendritic cells. When the d6 progeny are depleted of mature macrophages and residual CD34+ precursors, a discrete CD14+ HLA-DR+ population persists in addition to immunostimulatory CD14- HLA- DR() dendritic cells. Half of the CD14+ HLA-DR+ population is in cell cycle (Ki-67+), but colony-forming units (CFUs) are no longer detectable. The calls are c-fms+, but lack myeloperoxidase and nonspecific esterase. They also possess substantial phagocytic and allostimulatory activity. These post-CFU, CD14+ HLA-DR+ intermediates develop into typical macrophages when recultured in the absence of exogenous cytokines. M-CSF supports up to approximately 2.5-fold expansion of macrophage progeny. In contrast, the combination of GM-CSF and TNF-alpha supports quantitative differentiation into dendritic cells, lacking c-fms, CD14, and other macrophage properties, and expressing HLA-DR, CD1a, CD83, CD80, CD86, and potent allostimulatory activity. Therefore, normal CD34+ BM precursors can generate a post-CFU bipotential intermediate in the presence of c-kit ligand, GM-CSF, and TNF-alpha. This intermediate cell type will develop along the dendritic cell pathway when macrophages are removed and GM-CSF and TNF-alpha are provided. Alternatively, it can differentiate along a macrophage pathway when recultured with or without M-CSF.

The presence and severity of skin and joint symptoms in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis frequently do not correspond, a discrepancy that has raised the question of whether they represent two related but different disease processes. The fact that some agents seem to work preferentially in one state over the other reinforces this idea. However, there are also several agents with combined efficacy against cutaneous and articular inflammation that appear to support the existence of a common aetiology. Here we review the clinical, epidemiological and genetic evidence for and against a common pathogenesis for the two diseases. We then discuss the cellular and molecular targets of their selected therapies and how they potentially implicate effector pathways as a common immunopathogenic mechanism. Finally, we examine a recently proposed model of psoriasis pathogenesis involving type 1 interferon-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells and how it may provide further clues to the aetiological links between psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

In contrast to previous reports that did not control for skin disease severity, this study demonstrates that patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis do not report significantly worse health-related QOL compared with patients with cutaneous psoriasis only. Nor do they report significantly greater dissatisfaction with current treatment options. These findings may reflect the intrinsic inadequacy of the QOL instruments used in this study for capturing the additional burden of joint disease. Alternatively, these findings may reflect the existence of a threshold of joint disease in patients with skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis below which joint symptoms are perceived as negligible relative to cutaneous disease.

No abstract

No abstract