SUMMARY Meiotic crossover (CO) recombination facilitates evolution and accurate chromosome segregation. CO distribution is tightly regulated: homolog pairs receive at least one CO, CO spacing is nonrandom, and COs occur preferentially in short genomic intervals called hotspots. We show that CO number and distribution are controlled on a chromosome-wide basis at the level of DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation by a condensin complex composed of subunits from two known condensins: the C. elegans dosage compensation complex and mitotic condensin II. Disruption of any subunit of the CO-controlling condensin dominantly changes DSB distribution, and thereby COs, and extends meiotic chromosome axes. These phenotypes are cosuppressed by disruption of a chromosome axis element. Our data implicate higher-order chromosome structure in the regulation of CO recombination, provide a model for the rapid evolution of CO hotspots, and show that reshuffling of interchangeable molecular parts can create independent machines with similar architectures but distinct biological functions.

Meiotic crossovers (COs) are tightly regulated to ensure that COs on the same chromosome are distributed far apart (crossover interference, COI) and that at least one CO is formed per homolog pair (CO homeostasis). CO formation is controlled in part during meiotic double-strand break (DSB) creation in Caenorhabditis elegans, but a second level of control must also exist because meiotic DSBs outnumber COs. We show that the antirecombinase RTEL-1 is required to prevent excess meiotic COs, probably by promoting meiotic synthesis-dependent strand annealing. Two distinct classes of meiotic COs are increased in rtel-1 mutants, and COI and homeostasis are compromised. We propose that RTEL-1 implements the second level of CO control by promoting noncrossovers.

Biological processes that function chromosome-wide are not well understood. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans protein DPY-28 controls two such processes, X-chromosome dosage compensation in somatic cells and meiotic crossover number and distribution in germ cells. DPY-28 resembles a subunit of condensin, a conserved complex required for chromosome compaction and segregation. In the soma, DPY-28 associates with the dosage compensation complex on hermaphrodite X chromosomes to repress transcript levels. In the germline, DPY-28 restricts crossovers. In many organisms, one crossover decreases the likelihood of another crossover nearby, an enigmatic process called crossover interference. In C. elegans, interference is complete: Only one crossover occurs per homolog pair. dpy-28 mutations increase crossovers, disrupt crossover interference, and alter crossover distribution. Early recombination intermediates (RAD-51 foci) increase concomitantly, suggesting that DPY-28 acts to limit double-strand breaks (DSBs). Reinforcing this view, dpy-28 mutations partially restore DSBs in mutants lacking HIM-17, a chromatin-associated protein required for DSB formation. Our work further links dosage compensation to condensin and establishes a new role for condensin components in regulating crossover number and distribution. We propose that both processes utilize a related mechanism involving changes in higher-order chromosome structure to achieve chromosome-wide effects.[Keywords: X-chromosome dosage compensation; condensin; meiosis; crossover interference; epigenetics; Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Received September 24, 2007; revised version accepted November 15, 2007. No biological processes that operate on the level of an entire metazoan chromosome are understood in detail. We show that two such processes, X-chromosome dosage compensation and meiotic crossover (CO) control, are linked through a shared protein. Dosage compensation is an essential regulatory process that equalizes expression of most X-linked genes between the sexes (XO or XY males and XX females), despite their twofold difference in X-chromosome dose. CO number and distribution are tightly controlled during meiosis to ensure proper chromosome segregation. The use of a common protein suggests that a related mechanism underlies these two seemingly disparate chromosome-wide processes.In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a dosage compensation complex (DCC) is targeted to both X chromosomes of hermaphrodites to reduce transcript levels by half, thereby achieving an X expression level in XX hermaphrodites similar to that in XO males (for review, see Meyer 2005). The DCC components DPY-27 and MIX-1 are members of the SMC (Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes) family of DNA-associated ATPases (Chuang et al. 1994;Lieb et al. 1998), and both resemble components of condensin, a highly conserved protein complex essential for the compaction, resolution, and segregation of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes from yeast to humans ...

Learning reflects the influence of experience on genetically determined circuitry, but little is known about how experience and genetics interact to determine complex learned phenotypes. Here, we used vocal learning in songbirds to study how experience and genetics contribute to interindividual differences in learned song. Previous work has established that such differences in song within a species depend on learning, but in principle some of these differences could also depend on genetic variation. We focused on song tempo, a learned and quantifiable feature that is controlled by central neural circuitry. To identify genetic contributions to tempo we computer-tutored juvenile Bengalese finches () from different genetic backgrounds with synthetic songs in which tempo was systematically varied. Computer-tutored birds exhibited unexpectedly strong heritability for song tempo and comparatively weak influence of experience. We then tested whether heritability was fixed and independent of experience by providing a second group of birds with enriched instruction via live social tutoring. Live tutoring resulted in not only a significant increase in the influence of experience on tempo but also a dramatic decrease in the influence of genetics, indicating that enriched instruction could overcome genetic biases evident under computer tutoring. Our results reveal strong heritable genetic contributions to interindividual variation in song tempo but that the degree of heritability depends profoundly on the quality of instruction. They suggest that for more complex learned phenotypes, where it can be difficult to identify and control relevant experiential variables, heritability may similarly be contingent on the specifics of experience.