Between 1978 and 1991, 54 patients with metastatic squamous cell or undifferentiated carcinoma to the cervical lymph nodes, with unknown primary mucosal sites, were treated with curative intent at McGill University teaching hospitals. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years with a male:female ratio of 6:1. All patients presented with a painless neck mass. Five patients (9%) presented with N1 disease, 28 (52%) with N2a disease, four (7%) with N2b disease, three (6%) with N2c disease, and 14 (26%) with N3 disease. Twenty-four patients (44%) underwent neck dissection, and 30 (56%) had only excisional lymph node biopsy. Fifty-three patients (98%) were treated with radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy (range 38 to 66 Gy) in 30 fractions. With a median follow-up time of 49 months, the overall actuarial survival was 63% and 59% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Three patients were found to have a subsequent primary head and neck tumor. The single most important prognostic factor was the N stage, which influences both neck control and long-term survival. There was no statistically significance difference in survival or local neck control rates between patients who had neck dissection or excisional lymph node biopsy (p > 0.05).
PurposeTo evaluate quality of life (QOL) and outcome of patients with anal carcinoma treated with short split-course chemoradiation (CRT).MethodsFrom 1991 to 2005, 58 patients with anal cancer were curatively treated with CRT. External beam radiotherapy (52 Gy/26 fractions) with elective groin irradiation (24 Gy) was applied in 2 series divided by a median gap of 12 days. Chemotherapy including fluorouracil and Mitomycin-C was delivered in two sequences. Long-term QOL was assessed using the site-specific EORTC QLQ-CR29 and the global QLQ-C30 questionnaires.ResultsFive-year local control, colostomy-free survival, and overall survival were 78%, 94% and 80%, respectively. The global QOL score according to the QLQ-C30 was good with 70 out of 100. The QLQ-CR29 questionnaire revealed that 77% of patients were mostly satisfied with their body image. Significant anal pain or fecal incontinence was infrequently reported. Skin toxicity grade 3 or 4 was present in 76% of patients and erectile dysfunction was reported in 100% of male patients.ConclusionsShort split-course CRT for anal carcinoma seems to be associated with good local control, survival and long-term global QOL. However, it is also associated with severe acute skin toxicity and sexual dysfunction. Implementation of modern techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) might be considered to reduce toxicity.
Brachytherapy has proven to be an extremely valuable method of treatment for head and neck cancer. The data supporting its application, however, is based on continuous low-dose-rate brachytherapy. To benefit from improved radiation protection, outpatient treatments, and increased patient tolerance of treatment set-up over that encountered in conventional low-dose-rate manually afterloaded brachytherapy, we implemented a high-dose-rate remote afterloading approach in selected patients with head and neck cancers. This treatment was utilized in two different roles in managing 29 patients. In its first role, it was used as the sole treatment in 13 patients with T1-2 N0 malignancies. A total of ten treatments of 450-500 cGy each were delivered twice a day with a minimum of 5-6 h between treatments. With a median follow-up of 9 months, only 1 patient failed locally. In a second role, brachytherapy was applied in a post-operative adjuvant setting following wide local excision of tumors in patients who presented with recurrent disease (12 cases) or a second primary in the head and neck (4 cases). All patients had previously received external irradiation to the head and neck. Due to this previous course of irradiation, only eight treatments of 300 cGy each were delivered, for a total of 2400 cGy over a period of 4 days. However, with a follow-up of 2-16 months, only 3 patients remain disease-free.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.