A great deal of evidence can be cited from higher education literature on the effectiveness of the flipped classroom; however, very little research was discovered on the flipped classroom at the K-12 level. This study examined K-12 teachers’ perceptions regarding the flipped classroom and differences in teachers’ perceptions based on grade level and content area taught. A researcher-developed survey instrument was used to collect data from K-12 teachers that utilize a flipped classroom in Southwest and South Central Minnesota. Survey participants totaled 44, which included 27 high school teachers, 15 middle school teachers, and 2 teachers that identified as other. It was found that participants perceived that the flipped classroom creates time for varied instructional techniques, including active learning and higher order thinking, along with increased student-to-teacher interaction. The insights from the study inform teachers in the field about benefits and best practices in regard to the flipped classroom instructional model.

No abstract

This study used a video-based educational leadership simulation to create a safe environment for professional discourse with school leaders. The researchers used a simulation about teacher-to-teacher bullying with actors of different genders as a prompt. Two simulations were used in this study, and both simulations followed the same script. However, the twist in this study is that one simulation was filmed with only male actors, and the other simulation was filmed with female actresses and male actors. Participants from both simulations were brought together after experiencing one of the two simulations. This study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach and post-simulation focus groups revealed three themes: some school leaders would treat females differently than males, some school leaders believed the leadership style was a factor, and some believed that gender was less of a factor than the unique teacher-principal relationship. The first conclusion of this study is that the relationship between the principal and the teacher is critical to how the principal responds to a scenario. The second conclusion is that facilitating simulations is an effective method to model a safe environment for discourse centered on sensitive topics.

This study explores the methodology presented in four leading educational leadership journals for a period of three years to investigate the predominant methodologies reported in journals most read by faculty members in educational administration or leadership programs. This content analysis study uses frequency and percentages to gather data on the published methodologies of four educational leadership journals. We used an established coding protocol, and our coding was not interpretive. The analysis revealed that qualitative methods were published more frequently than quantitative methods in the leading educational leadership journals with an emphasis on studies using a descriptive qualitative design, a descriptive quantitative design, correlational research, and case studies. This study replicated a study conducted by Wells, Kolek, Williams, and Saunders (2015) which was a content analysis of three major higher education journals to examine the methodologic characteristics of published research from 1996-2000 and 2006-2010 respectively. The authors discuss the relevance of the study for EdD programs in Educational Administration/Leadership. The analysis may inform decisions about how to best develop scholar-practitioners’ capacity to use systemic and systematic inquiry to solve complex problems of practice.

Educational leaders’ experiences with legal issues remain relatively unknown. Using an electronic survey, this study explored educational leaders’ ( N = 441) experiences with legal issues and with perceived levels of legal preparedness. Results revealed that years of experience and ethics training courses variables were statistically significant with perceived levels of legal preparedness. The legal issues with the highest frequency reported by educational leaders included suspected child abuse, reports of bullying/harassment, and whether a student poses a danger to other students. Implications for educational leaders and educational training programs are provided.