Background Those with low socioeconomic status have an increased risk of stroke, more severe strokes, reduced access to treatment, and more adverse outcomes after stroke. The question is why these differences are present. In this study we investigate to which extent the association between low socioeconomic status and stroke severity can be explained by differences in risk factors and stroke prevention drugs. Methods The study included 86 316 patients registered with an ischemic stroke in the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) 2012–2016. Data on socioeconomic status was retrieved from the Longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA) by individual linkage. We used education level as proxy for socioeconomic status, with primary school education classified as low education. Stroke severity was measured using the Reaction Level Scale, with values above 1 classified as severe strokes. To investigate the pathways via risk factors and stroke prevention drugs we performed a mediation analysis estimating indirect and direct effects. Results Low education was associated with an excess risk of a severe stroke compared to mid/high education (absolute risk difference 1.4%, 95% CI: 1.0%-1.8%), adjusting for confounders. Of this association 28.5% was an indirect effect via risk factors (absolute risk difference 0.4%, 95% CI: 0.3%-0.5%), while the indirect effect via stroke prevention drugs was negligible. Conclusion Almost one third of the association between low education and severe stroke was explained by risk factors, and clinical effort should be taken to reduce these risk factors to decrease stroke severity among those with low socioeconomic status.

Background and Purpose: Intravenous thrombolysis is a well-established treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to quantify the effect of each minute delay in door-to-needle time (DNT) on 90-day survival, intracerebral hemorrhagic complication <36 hours, and functional outcomes at 3 months, in routine clinical practice. Methods: Our nationwide registry-based study included 14 132 adult patient admissions with ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis from 2010 to 2017. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Median DNT was 47 minutes, with an improvement from 65 to 38 minutes during the study. Median age was 74 years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 8 points. We found a significant impact of each minute delay in DNT with reduced odds of survival by 0.6%, increased odds of intracerebral hemorrhagic and worse activities of daily living by 0.3%, and worse living conditions and mobility by 0.4%. Conclusions: Improving DNT is a key factor in achieving good outcomes after stroke. We estimate that in Sweden alone in 2017, compared with 2010, the shorter DNT achieved have saved 38 lives, avoided 8 intracerebral hemorrhagic transformations, and spared, respectively, 36, 51, and 52 patients from a worsening in activities of daily living, living conditions, and mobility. DNT is sensitive for interventions and should be targeted in quality improvement efforts.

Time of admission affects the quality of care across a wide range of clinical presentations including acute stroke. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In particular, a recently published meta-analysis revealed increased short-term mortality and disability at discharge in stroke patients who had presented off-hours. 12 However, less is known about the underlying causes of these effects. 13,14 A recent study on general emergency admissions found that the magnitude of the weekend effect was significantly reduced when adjusting for patient comorbidity and common blood tests, suggesting that differences in patient characteristics contribute. 15Objectives: A recent study of acute stroke patients in England and Wales revealed several patterns of temporal variation in quality of care. We hypothesized that similar patterns would be present in Sweden and aimed to describe these patterns.Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether hospital type conferred resilience against temporal variation. Materials and Methods:We conducted this nationwide registry-based study using data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) including all adult patients registered with acute stroke between 2011 and 2015. Outcomes included process measures and survival. We modeled time of presentation as on/off-hours, shifts, day of week, 4-hour, and 12-hour time blocks. We studied hospital resilience by comparing outcomes across hospital types. Results:A total of 113 862 stroke events in 72 hospitals were included. The process indicators and survival all showed significant temporal variation. Door-to-needle (DTN) time within 30 minutes was less likely during nighttime than daytime (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.41-0.60). Patients admitted during off-hours had lower odds of direct stroke unit (SU) admission (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.70-0.75). 30-day survival was lower in nighttime vs daytime presentations (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.96). The effects of temporal variation differed significantly between hospital types for DTN time within 30 minutes and direct SU admission where university hospitals were more resilient than specialized non-university hospitals. Conclusions:Our study shows that variation in quality of care and survival is present throughout the whole week. We also found that university hospitals were more resilient to temporal variation than specialized non-university hospitals. K E Y W O R D S off-hours, quality of care, stroke, temporal variation, weekend effect, weekly variation S U PP O RTI N G I N FO R M ATI O N Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article. How to cite this article: Darehed D, Blom M, Glader E-L, et al. Diurnal variations in the quality of stroke care in Sweden. Acta

Introduction: It is well established that managing patients with acute stroke in dedicated stroke units is associated with improved functioning and survival. The objectives of this study are to investigate whether patients with acute stroke are less likely to be directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department when hospital beds are scarce and to measure variation across hospitals in terms of this outcome. Patients and methods: This register study comprised data on patients with acute stroke admitted to 14 out of 72 Swedish hospitals in 2011-2014. Data from the Swedish stroke register were linked to administrative daily data on hospital bed occupancy (measured at 6 a.m.). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the association between bed occupancy and direct stroke unit admission. Results: A total of 13,955 hospital admissions were included; 79.6% were directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. Each percentage increase in hospital bed occupancy was associated with a 1.5% decrease in odds of direct admission to a stroke unit (odds ratio ¼ 0.985, 95% confidence interval ¼ 0.978-0.992). The best-performing hospital exhibited an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% confidence interval ¼ 2.6-5.5) for direct admission to a stroke unit versus the reference hospital. Discussion and conclusion: We found an association between hospital crowding and reduced quality of care in acute stroke, portrayed by a lower likelihood of patients being directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. The magnitude of the effect varied considerably across hospitals.

Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice for patients in need of long-term nutritional support or gastric decompression. Although it is considered safe, complications and relatively high mortality rates have been reported. We aimed to identify risk factors for complications and mortality after PEG in routine healthcare. Methods This retrospective study included all adult patients who received a PEG between 2013 and 2019 in Region Norrbotten, Sweden. Results 389 patients were included. The median age was 72 years, 176 (45%) were women and 281 (72%) patients received their PEG due to neurological disease. All-cause mortality was 15% at 30 days and 28% at 90 days. Malignancy as the indication for PEG was associated with increased mortality at 90 days (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.20–8.88). Other factors significantly associated with increased mortality were older age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, lower body mass index and higher C-reactive protein levels. Minor and major complications within 30 days occurred in 11% and 15% of the patients, respectively. Diabetes increased the risk of minor complications (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.04–6.55), while those aged 75 + years were at an increased risk of major complications, compared to those younger than 65 years (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02–4.85). Conclusions The increased risk of death among women and patients with malignancy indicate that these patients could benefit from earlier referral for PEG. Additionally, we found that age, diabetes, heart failure, C-reactive protein and body mass index all impact the risk of adverse outcomes.