As compared with standard duty-hour policies, flexible, less-restrictive duty-hour policies for surgical residents were associated with noninferior patient outcomes and no significant difference in residents' satisfaction with overall well-being and education quality. (FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02050789.).

Background: Despite an increasing number of women in the field of surgery, bias regarding cognitive or technical ability may continue to affect the experience of female trainees differently than their male counterparts. This study examines the differences in the degree of operative autonomy given to female compared with male general surgery trainees. Methods: A smartphone app was used to collect evaluations of operative autonomy measured using the 4-point Zwisch scale, which describes defined steps in the progression from novice ("show and tell") to autonomous surgeon ("supervision only"). Differences in autonomy between male and female residents were compared using hierarchical logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 412 residents and 524 faculty from 14 general surgery training programs evaluated 8,900 cases over a 9-month period. Female residents received less autonomy from faculty than did male residents overall (P < .001). Resident level of training and case complexity were the strongest predictors of autonomy. Even after controlling for potential confounding factors, including level of training, intrinsic procedural difficulty, patient-related case complexity, faculty sex, and training program environment, female residents still received less operative autonomy than their male counterparts. The greatest discrepancy was in the fourth year of training.

Background-Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for acute respiratory distress syndrome and as a bridge to lung transplantation. After initiation of venovenous ECMO, systemic anticoagulation therapy is traditionally administered and can cause bleeding diathesis. Here, we investigated whether venovenous ECMO can be administered without continuous systemic anticoagulation administration for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Methods-This is a retrospective review of an institutional ECMO database. We included consecutive patients from January 2015 through February 2019. Overall, 38 patients received low levels of continuous systemic anticoagulation (AC + ) whereas the subsequent 36 patients received standard venous thromboprophylaxis (AC −). Published Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines were used for the definition of outcomes and complications.Results-Overall, survival was not different between the two groups (P = .58). However, patients in the AC + group had higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (28.9%, vs AC− group 5.6%; P < .001). The events per patient-day of gastrointestinal bleeding was 0.00025 in the AC− group and 0.00064 in the AC+ group (P < .001). In addition, oxygenator dysfunction was increased in the AC + group (28.9% and 0.00067 events per patient-day, vs AC− 11.1% and 0.00062 events per patient-day; P = .02). Furthermore, the AC+ group received more transfusions: packed red blood cells, AC+ group 94.7% vs AC− group 55.5% (P < .001); fresh frozen plasma, AC+ 60.5% vs AC − 16.6% (P = .001); and platelets, AC+ 84.2% vs AC− 27.7% (P < .001). There was no circuit thrombosis in either groups throughout the duration of ECMO support.Conclusions-Our results suggest that venovenous ECMO can be safely administered without continuous systemic anticoagulation therapy. This approach may be associated with reduced bleeding diathesis and need for blood transfusions.

No abstract

Robotic lobectomies have significantly increased in stage I to IIIA NSCLC patients, with outcomes similar to other approaches. Additional studies are needed to determine if this technology offers potential advantages compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic operations.

Background Veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V‐V ECMO) support is increasingly used in the management of COVID‐19‐related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the clinical decision‐making to initiate V‐V ECMO for severe COVID‐19 still remains unclear. In order to determine the optimal timing and patient selection, we investigated the outcomes of both COVID‐19 and non‐COVID‐19 patients undergoing V‐V ECMO support. Methods Overall, 138 patients were included in this study. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: those with COVID‐19 and non‐COVID‐19 ARDS. Results The survival in patients with COVID‐19 was statistically similar to non‐COVID‐19 patients ( p = .16). However, the COVID‐19 group demonstrated higher rates of bleeding ( p = .03) and thrombotic complications ( p < .001). The duration of V‐V ECMO support was longer in COVID‐19 patients compared to non‐COVID‐19 patients (29.0 ± 27.5 vs 15.9 ± 19.6 days, p < .01). Most notably, in contrast to the non‐COVID‐19 group, we found that COVID‐19 patients who had been on a ventilator for longer than 7 days prior to ECMO had 100% mortality without a lung transplant. Conclusions These findings suggest that COVID‐19‐associated ARDS was not associated with a higher post‐ECMO mortality than non‐COVID‐19‐associated ARDS patients, despite longer duration of extracorporeal support. Early initiation of V‐V ECMO is important for improved ECMO outcomes in COVID‐19 ARDS patients. Since late initiation of ECMO was associated with extremely high mortality related to lack of pulmonary recovery, it should be used judiciously or as a bridge to lung transplantation.

No abstract

No abstract