Implementation of in vitro assays that correlate with in vivo human pharmacokinetics (PK) would provide desirable preclinical tools for the early selection of therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) candidates with minimal non-target-related PK risk. Use of these tools minimizes the likelihood that mAbs with unfavorable PK would be advanced into costly preclinical and clinical development. In total, 42 mAbs varying in isotype and soluble versus membrane targets were tested in in vitro and in vivo studies. MAb physicochemical properties were assessed by measuring non-specific interactions (DNA- and insulin-binding ELISA), self-association (affinity-capture self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy) and binding to matrix-immobilized human FcRn (surface plasmon resonance and column chromatography). The range of scores obtained from each in vitro assay trended well with in vivo clearance (CL) using both human FcRn transgenic (Tg32) mouse allometrically projected human CL and observed human CL, where mAbs with high in vitro scores resulted in rapid CL in vivo. Establishing a threshold value for mAb CL in human of 0.32 mL/hr/kg enabled refinement of thresholds for each in vitro assay parameter, and using a combinatorial triage approach enabled the successful differentiation of mAbs at high risk for rapid CL (unfavorable PK) from those with low risk (favorable PK), which allowed mAbs requiring further characterization to be identified. Correlating in vitro parameters with in vivo human CL resulted in a set of in vitro tools for use in early testing that would enable selection of mAbs with the greatest likelihood of success in the clinic, allowing costly late-stage failures related to an inadequate exposure profile, toxicity or lack of efficacy to be avoided.

Developability considerations should be integrated with lead engineering of antibody drug candidates in interest of their cost effective translations into medicines. To explore feasibility of this imperative, we have performed rational mutagenesis studies on a monoclonal antibody (MAB1) whose development was discontinued owing to manufacturability hurdles. Seven computationally designed variants of MAB1 containing single point (V44K, E59S, E59T and E59Y) and double (V44KE59S, V44KE59T and V44KE59Y) mutations in its light chain were produced in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells and purified by using platform processes employed during commercial scale production of monoclonal antibodies. MAB1 and its variants were formulated in the same platform buffer and subjected to a battery of experiments to assess their solution behaviors, and biological activities. Five of the seven (71%) variants of MAB1 demonstrated improved biophysical attributes in multiple experimental testings. Contrary to the commonly expressed reservations about potential biological activity loss upon developability optimizations, the improvements in solution behavior of MAB1 also increased its biological activity up to ~180%. In particular, concentrate-ability and apparent solubility of V44KE59S improved to ~150% and ~160%, respectively. Its diffusion interaction parameter (kD) reduced to 28% and viscosity at ~100 mg/ml decreased to less than half of the corresponding values for MAB1. V44KE59S is also slightly more active and its transfections in CHO cells were more productive. It also degraded slower than MAB1 in three month long 25°C and 40°C formulation stability studies. These results open doors to an exciting realm of structure-based biologic drug design where developability and biological activity can be simultaneously optimized at the molecular engineering stages.

No abstract

No abstract

Commercial specifications for a new biotherapeutic product are a critical component of the product's overall control strategy that ensures safety and efficacy. This paper describes strategies for setting commercial specifications as proposed by a consortium of industry development scientists. The specifications for some attributes are guided by compendia and regulatory guidance. For other product quality attributes (PQAs), product knowledge and the understanding of attribute criticality built throughout product development should drive specification setting. The foundation of PQA knowledge is an understanding of potential patient impact through an assessment of potency, PK, immunogenicity and safety. In addition to PQA knowledge, the ability of the manufacturing process to consistently meet specifications, typically assessed through statistical analyses, is an important consideration in the specification-setting process. Setting acceptance criteria that are unnecessarily narrow can impact the ability to supply product or prohibit consideration of future convenient dosage forms. Patient-centric specifications enable appropriate control over higher risk PQAs to ensure product quality for the patient, and flexibility for lower risk PQAs for a sustainable supply chain. This paper captures common strategic approaches for setting specifications for standard biotherapeutic products such as monoclonal antibodies and includes considerations for ensuring specifications are patient centric.