ImportancePulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison.ObjectiveTo compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsInvestigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022.InterventionsThe PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications.ResultsAmong 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, –1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P < .001) and ablation times (34 [SD, 21] vs 28 [SD, 12] minutes, P < .001) were significantly shorter for PVI alone. There were 6 complications for PVI with PWI and 4 for PVI alone.Conclusions and RelevanceIn patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF.Trial Registrationanzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460

Background: Population studies have demonstrated a range of sex differences including a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in men and a higher risk of AF recurrence in women. However, the underlying reasons for this higher recurrence are unknown. This study evaluated whether sex-based electrophysiological substrate differences exist to account for worse AF ablation outcomes in women. Methods: High-density electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium was performed in 116 consecutive patients with AF. Regional analysis was performed across 6 left atrium segments. High-density maps were created using a multipolar catheter (Biosense Webster) during distal coronary sinus pacing at 600 and 300 ms. Mean voltage and conduction velocity was determined. Complex fractionated signals and double potentials were manually annotated. Results: Overall, 42 (36%) were female, mean age was 61±8 years and AF was persistent in 52%. Global mean voltage was significantly lower in females compared with males at 600 ms (1.46±0.17 versus 1.84±0.15 mV, P <0.001) and 300 ms (1.27±0.18 versus 1.57±0.18 mV, P =0.013) pacing. These differences were seen uniformly across the left atrium. Females demonstrated significant conduction velocity slowing (34.9±6.1 versus 44.1±6.9 cm/s, P =0.002) and greater proportion of complex fractionated signals (9.9±1.7% versus 6.0±1.7%, P =0.014). After a median follow-up of 22 months (Q1–Q3: 15–29), females had significantly lower single-procedure (22 [54%] versus 54 [75%], P =0.029) and multiprocedure (24 [59%] versus 60 [83%], P =0.005) arrhythmia-free survival. Female sex and persistent AF were independent predictors of single and multiprocedure arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions: Female patients demonstrated more advanced atrial remodeling on high-density electroanatomic mapping and greater post-AF ablation arrhythmia recurrence compared with males. These changes may contribute to sex-based differences in the clinical course of females with AF and in part explain the higher risk of recurrence.