Background COVID-19 has disrupted the 2020–2021 residency application cycle with the cancellation of away rotations and in-person interviews. This study seeks to investigate the feasibility and utility of video conferencing technology (VCT) as an opportunity for applicants to interact with faculty from outside programs. Methods 18 prospective urology applicants were randomized to 6 urology programs to give a virtual grand rounds (VGR) talk. Presentations were recorded and analyzed to determine audience engagement. Students were surveyed regarding perceived utility of VGR. Faculty were surveyed to determine system usability of VCT and ability to evaluate the applicant. Results 17 students completed the survey, reporting a 100% satisfaction rate with VGR. A majority felt this was a useful way to learn about outside programs. 85 physicians completed the faculty survey, with nearly half feeling confident in their ability to evaluate the applicant. Video transcription data shows sessions were interactive with minimal distractions. Conclusions VGR can be a useful means for medical students to express interest in programs as well as an additional marker for faculty to evaluate applicants.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Introduction: Annually the U.S. spends approximately $55.6 billion on malpractice and medical liability, with urology ranked 11th out of 25 specialties for number of malpractice claims. Our objective was to identify common causes for filing claims associated with cystectomy as well as corresponding payout outcomes.Methods: Using the WestlawÒ legal database, a search was conducted using the keywords, "cystectomy," "cystoprostatectomy" and "bladder removal" between January 1, 1990 and January 1, 2020. Each case was evaluated for plaintiff demographics, alleged malpractice claim, defendant specialty, resulting clinical outcome, resulting legal outcome including verdict and monetary award. Alleged malpractice claims were further subdivided based on whether the claimed negligence of duty was preoperative, perioperative or postoperative. Data were analyzed using MicrosoftÒ Office ExcelÒ.Results: After accounting for irrelevant and duplicate cases the Westlaw search returned 42 unique cases. The most common indication for cystectomy was bladder cancer (69%). Preoperative negligence resulted in the highest average payout ($2,062,204.00) and accounted for 76% of filed claims, with delay in diagnosis accounting for the most common complaint (47%). Urologists made up the highest percentage of defendants sued, at 62%. Conclusions:The bulk of alleged malpractice in cystectomy cases is due to preoperative negligence, most predominantly in the delay of cancer diagnosis. Alleged cases of preoperative negligence also return the highest award for the plaintiff. This study sheds light on areas of concern that urologists should be aware of associated with cystectomy litigation.
ObjectivesTo determine the learning curve (LC) of total operative time and the discrete components of the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for a recent robotic fellowship‐trained urologic surgeon.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of RARP procedures performed by a single new attending surgeon from August 2015 to April 2019. Patients' demographics and operative details were assessed. Total operative time was divided and prospectively recorded in 7 parts: (a) docking robot, (b) dissecting seminal vesicles (SVs) (c) dissecting endopelvic fascia (EPF), (d) incising bladder neck (BN), (e) completing the dissection, (f) lymph node dissection, and (g) urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA) and robot undocking. Cumulative sum analysis was used to ascertain the LC for total operative time and the 7 parts of the procedure.ResultsOne hundred twenty consecutive RARPs were performed. The LC was overcome at 25 cases for total operative time, 13 cases for docking the robot, 33 cases for dissecting SVs, 31 cases for dissecting EPF, 46 cases for incising BN, 38 cases for prostate dissection, 25 cases for lymph node dissection, and 52 cases for UVA. Total operative time was decreased 22.8% (p < 0.0001) and time for robot docking, dissecting SVs, dissecting EPF, incising BN, completing prostate dissection, lymph node dissection, and UVA were decreased 16.7%, 30.5%, 29.5%, 36.2%, 37.3%, 32.2%, and 26.9%, respectively (all p < 0.05).ConclusionsWe observed a 25-case LC for a fellowship-trained urologist to achieve stable operative performance of RARP surgery. Procedural components demonstrated variable LCs including the UVA that required upward of 52 cases.
Introduction: Surgical experience requires skills traditionally taught through real-time operating room education and a variety of supplemental educational strategies. Video-based coaching is a modality that may offer potential advantages of immediate, direct and targeted feedback. The objective of this study was to demonstrate and evaluate the utility and educational value of videobased coaching in urology by conducting a qualitative analysis with a coding schema.Methods: Residents and attendings were recorded operating during randomly selected cases in the operating room. Video-based coaching sessions were held during urology grand rounds and required residents to describe a selected portion of the operating room video and attendings to provide teaching points. Audio recordings from the operating room and video-based coaching sessions were reviewed by 2 independent coders. A coding scale classifying surgical educational goals into 5 categories (information, operative technique, questioning, response to resident interaction and unrelated commenting) was used to identify the interactions and was adjusted for time.Results: Four urological cases were selected for recording. In the video-based coaching sessions compared to the operating room, attendings made more teaching points per hour, provided more information to residents (mean teaching points 7.7 for video-based coaching vs 2.9 for operating room, p <0.005), emphasized operative skills and technique (mean teaching points 10.5 for videobased coaching vs 4.1 for operating room, p <0.005), and were more likely to ask open-ended discussion leading questions (mean teaching points 28.5 for video-based coaching vs 4.4 for operating room, p <0.05).Conclusions: Video-based coaching delivered in short time frames offers an easily implementable additional learning opportunity for resident education to further enhance skills learned in the urological operating room.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.