Background and Objective Currently, computed tomography‐guided transthoracic biopsy (CTTB) is the most accurate diagnostic approach for pulmonary nodules suspected of malignancy. Traditional bronchoscopy has shown suboptimal diagnostic sensitivity, but the emergence of robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, maximize diagnostic yield and complete mediastinal and hilar staging in a single procedure. We aim to assess the efficacy and diagnostic performance of RAB compared to CTTB for diagnosing pulmonary nodules suspected of lung cancer. Methods A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAB and CTTB for evaluating pulmonary nodules from January 2019 to March 2021 at Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Rochester, United States. Clinical and demographic information, nodule characteristics, outcomes and complications were compared between RAB and CTTB. Results A total of 225 patients were included: 113 in the RAB group and 112 in the CTTB group. Overall diagnostic yield was 87.6% for RAB and 88.4% for CTTB. For malignant disease, RAB had a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 100%, CTTB had a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 100%. Complication rate was significantly higher for CTTB compared to RAB (17% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.002). Conclusion RAB, when available, can be as accurate as CTTB for sampling pulmonary nodules with similar or reduced complications and should be considered as a means for nodule biopsy, particularly when mediastinal staging is also clinically warranted.

Dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and recurrent respiratory infections are frequently encountered clinical concerns leading patients to seek medical care. It is not unusual for a well-defined etiology to remain elusive or for the therapeutics of a presumed etiology to be incompletely effective. Either scenario should prompt consideration of central airway pathology as a contributor to clinical manifestations. Over the past decade, recognition of dynamic central airway collapse during respiration associated with multiple respiratory symptoms has become more commonly appreciated. Expiratory central airway collapse may represent the answer to this diagnostic void. Expiratory central airway collapse is an underdiagnosed disorder that can coexist with and mimic asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bronchiectasis. Awareness of expiratory central airway collapse and its spectrum of symptoms is paramount to its recognition. This review includes clear definitions, diagnostics, and therapeutics for this challenging condition. We performed a narrative review through the PubMed (MEDLINE) database using the following MeSH terms: airway collapse, tracheobronchomalacia, tracheomalacia, and bronchomalacia. We include reports from systematic reviews, narrative reviews, clinical trials, and observational studies from 2005 to 2020. Two reviewers evaluated potential references. No systematic reviews were found. A total of 28 references were included into our review. Included studies report experience in the diagnosis and/or treatment of dynamic central airway collapse; case reports and non-English or non-Spanish studies were excluded. We describe the current diagnostic dilemma, highlighting the role of dynamic bronchoscopy and tracheobronchial stent trial; outline the complex therapeutic options (eg, tracheobronchoplasty); and present future directions and challenges.

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a safe and minimally invasive procedure for evaluating hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. The reported sensitivity and specificity of EBUS-TBNA are 95% and 97%, respectively. A comparison of diagnostic sensitivity for lymph nodes suspected of lung cancer according to needle size in EBUS-TBNA is needed.Objectives: To compare the diagnostic sensitivity of the 19-G, 21-G, 22-G and 25-G needles for lymph nodes suspected of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using EBUS-TBNA.Methods: A literature search from PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, DOAJ and CENTRAL through October 2020 was performed by two reviewers. The extracted data were evaluated using STATA ® and Open Meta Analyst software for meta-analysis with a binary method model to compare sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic curve for each needle size.Results: Fourteen studies including 1296 participants were considered for the analysis. The overall sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was 88.2% (95% CI 84%, 91%) and 93% (95% CI 88%, 95%) for the 19-G needle, 87.6% (95% CI 79.6%, 92.8%) for the 21-G needle and 85% (95% CI 80%, 88%) for the 22-G needle. The overall sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing NSCLC was 88.3% (95% CI, 81%, 93%) and 92.9% (95% CI, 85%, 97%) for the 19-G needle, 89.4% (95% CI 79.4%, 94.8%) for the 21-G needle and 82.1% (95% CI 66%, 91%) for the 22-G needle. Conclusion:The 19-G, 21-G and 22-G needles present a similarly high diagnostic sensitivity in EBUS-TBNA. The 19-G needle provided better sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical testing, improving diagnostic yield in this subgroup.

Robotic assisted bronchoscopy represents a major turning point in bronchoscopic history. The management strategies to address significant airway bleeding in this “robotic era” are not well documented, and further guidance is required. We present a case report that exemplifies our approach and management strategy using a combined and simultaneous flexible/robotic bronchoscopy if this complication is encountered.

Endobronchial tumors (ET) are unusual and mostly malignant, presenting with non-specific symptoms that often delay appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Lymphomas in the airway represent less than 1% of pulmonary malignancies and require multidisciplinary approach for their management. We present a case of a 48-year-old male former smoker with a one-year history of recurrent respiratory infections and new-onset shortness of breath. Diagnostic tests included a chest computed tomography (CT) reporting the presence of an endobronchial mass and neck and cervical lymph node biopsies with inconclusive results. Bronchoscopy was successfully performed for tumor resection, improving the patient’s respiratory symptoms. Histological analysis described an extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (ENMZL) with plasmacytic differentiation; a subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), rarely found as an endobronchial growth. ET should be considered in the setting of persistent and worsening respiratory symptoms. ENMZL with plasmacytic differentiation is rarely found as an ET and diagnosis requires bronchoscopic intervention and extensive immunohistochemical analysis.

Bronchoscopy in thrombocytopenic patients remains a controversial topic as traditionally varying platelet thresholds have been stablished as “safe,” ranging from 20,000 to 50,000. A lower threshold may be safe for a routine airway inspection with bronchoalveolar lavage but will be far from safe for more invasive interventions such as needle biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, or cryo‐biopsy. Currently, a minimal platelet threshold during robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has not been established. In addition, the absolute platelet number does not guarantee appropriate platelet function. The literature regarding the safety of bronchoscopy and its bleeding risk, considering broader and more functional tests such as thromboelastography (TEG), is also lacking. We present our RAB approach to safely sample lung nodules in a patient with thrombocytopenia. Our precautionary strategy for high‐risk bleeding cases during RAB utilizing TEG and parallel flexible bronchoscopy with segmental balloon occlusion may be an appropriate technique to minimize bleeding risk.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common and has significant morbidity and mortality as the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. In many patients, particularly those with emphysema, COPD is characterized by markedly increased residual volume contributing to exertional dyspnea. Current therapies have limited efficacy. Surgical resection of diseased areas of the lung to reduce residual volume was effective in identified subgroups but also had significant mortality in and suboptimal cost effectiveness. Lung-volume reduction, using bronchoscopic techniques, has shown substantial benefits in a broader patient population with less morbidity and mortality. This review is meant to spread the awareness about bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction and to promote its consideration and early referral for patients with advanced COPD and emphysema frequently encountered by both primary care physicians and specialists.A search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), EMbase, and Cochrane library for original studies, using the following keywords: "lung-volume reduction." "endobronchial valves," "intrabronchial valves," "bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction," and "endoscopic lung-volume reduction." We included reports from systematic reviews, narrative reviews, clinical trials, and observational studies. Two reviewers evaluated potential references. A total of 27 references were included in our review. Included studies report experience in the diagnosis and bronchoscopic treatment for emphysema; case reports and non-English or non-Spanish studies were excluded.

Background: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), body mass index (BMI) is significantly lower in the emphysema-dominant type. Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) is an innovative way of treating severe emphysema. However, the specific associations of low BMI values and outcomes of ELVR is not well-studied. Objectives: We evaluated associations between initial BMI and changes in major outcomes after endobronchial valve (EBV) placement in patients with heterogeneous severe emphysema. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into 2 groups based on their baseline BMI (higher BMI ≥21 kg/m 2 [n = 18] and lower BMI < 21 kg/m 2 [n = 63]). Demographics, procedure data, pulmonary function test and 6-min-walk test (6MWT), dyspnea score (according to the modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] scale), BODE (BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, exercise capacity) index, and complications were recorded. After 6 months, changes in variables (dWeight and dBMI) were recorded. Results: Comparing the 2 groups, we found the following: a dWeight of-2.34 kg and +3.39 kg (p value < 0.01) and a dBMI of-0.74 and +1.99 kg/m 2 , in the higher BMI and lower BMI group, respectively (p value < 0.01). Changes in forced expiratory volume < 1 s (FEV 1), 6MWT, mMRC score, and BODE index were not statistically significant. The most common complication was pneumothorax. The lower BMI group experienced more complications than the higher BMI group (40 vs. 24%). Conclusion: Baseline BMI is relevant when selecting candidates for ELVR. Our results show that the COPD patients with a lower BMI gained a significant amount of weight, thus increasing their BMI after the procedure. The rate of complications was higher in the lower BMI group. These findings should alert physicians and encourage nutritional assessment in this population.