Two experiments are reported which suggest that affixed words are not morphologically decomposed but are processed as single units. Experiment 1 involved a lexical decision task, and it suggested that lexical access does not require decomposition. Experiment 2 involved a task designed to maximize the opportunity for decomposition, but it showed that subjects processed the test items as single units. These results are discussed in relation to other evidence that has been offered to support the occurrence of morphological decomposition.

For stimulus dimensions of line location and orientation with both card-sorting and discrete reaction-time trials, facilitation occurred when dimensions were positively correlated, and interference appeared when dimensions varied orthogonally. Interference could not be attributed to differential sensory accrual arising from positional uncertainty or to a repetition-effects advantage for control over orthogonal conditions. Facilitation tended to disappear when the same response was not required for the two dimensions, and when competing responses were required, interference appeared with redundant dimensions (negatively correlated stimulus sets). These data seem consistent with a model that calls for automatic and parallel extraction of features and their locations, with facilitation-interference effects having their locus in postperceptual response processing.

The perception of depth in monocularly viewed pictures has been investigated with the use of a binocular rangefinder developed by Gregory. Two experiments are reported which focus upon stimulus conditions that were identified by Haber as conventions for rendering depth in pictures. Several conclusions, which concern assumptions that must be made in interpreting pictures according to such conventions, are supported by the results. There is a default or assumed layout of background space. The interpretation of a point in a depiction depends upon the interpretation of neighboring points, so that interpretations of local features influence the interpretations of nearby 'empty' areas. In photographs, the magnitude of apparent depth depends upon the degree of discrepancy between the position of the illuminating source and the observer's supposed light-source position. Also in photographs, apparent depth increases as the contrast between highlights and attached shadows increases.

No abstract