Background:Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) provide clinical benefits in breast reconstruction but have been associated with increased postoperative complications, most frequently seromas. Fenestration of the ADM before insertion into the reconstructed breast may reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. In this retrospective analysis, postoperative complications were assessed after breast reconstruction with or without fenestrated ADMs.Methods:Patients who underwent immediate 2-staged implant breast reconstructions using ADM at a single center were assessed. The number of reconstructed breasts was stratified by ADM fenestration status and ADM type. The incidence of seroma, infection, extrusion, and explantation, and cosmetic score, was compared within the 2 stratified groups. A multivariable regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with these complications and aesthetic outcome.Results:In total, data from 450 patients who had 603 breast reconstructions using either AlloDerm or FlexHD demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of seroma with nonfenestrated ADMs (20%) versus fenestrated ADMs (11%; P = 0.0098). Rates of infection and explantation, and cosmetic score, were not influenced by fenestration status. In the multivariable analysis, ADM fenestration remained a significant protective factor for seroma formation. FlexHD also yielded a lower incidence of extrusion (P = 0.0031) and a higher cosmetic score (P = 0.0466) compared with AlloDerm after adjusting for other risk factors.Conclusions:The results of this study support ADM fenestration for reduction of seroma incidence in breast reconstruction, without affecting cosmetic results. Additionally, the choice of ADM may reduce extrusion incidence and improve aesthetic outcomes.
The authors began to use 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) Desmopressin Acetate routinely in their facelift patients who had a relatively high risk of bleeding, either from Von Willebrand factor deficiency, platelet dysfunction, aspirin intake, or ease of ecchymosis. Based on their observations that these patients had enhanced clotting and recovery times, they decided to undertake a prospective evaluation of the effects of Desmopressin Acetate when administered as a preoperative intravenous supplement during cosmetic facioplasty. A series of 200 consecutive patients undergoing surgery was divided into control and treatment groups. A total of 100 patients did not receive medication perioperatively, and 100 subsequent patients received preoperative DDAVP. All patients were observed for ecchymosis and swelling postoperatively and were graded by our postsurgical management team. Postsurgical ecchymosis was graded as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), or severe (grade 3). Grade 4 indicated an expanding hematoma that required immediate surgical intervention. Grades 1 and 2 ecchymosis resolved within 3 weeks. Grade 3 ecchymosis or microhematomas required intervention such as needle aspiration or massage therapy. These small collections of blood generally required substantially longer to resolve and generated notable anxiety in the patients involved. Patients were excluded from the trial if there was a previous history of hypercoagulability or because treatment with DDAVP was medically contraindicated. A total of 23% of untreated patients required intervention for grade 3 ecchymosis compared with 3% of DDAVP-treated patients. No patients experienced any complications associated with DDAVP--namely, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, electrolyte imbalance, or renal insufficiency. The authors undertook this study to determine whether DDAVP would help to decrease the incidence of microhematomas after facelift. Based on the results of their grading system and study, they think that the use of DDAVP is safe and efficacious in the prevention of troublesome microhematomas after facelift. Interestingly, although their male facelift patients challenged their efforts to obtain satisfactory hemostasis during and after surgery, the DDAVP-treated male patients responded with marked improvement in postoperative grading after treatment. Obtaining hemostasis intraoperatively was facilitated as well in these patients. This gender phenomenon was even more dramatic when compared with our female patient population.
The ability to perform abdominal cosmetic surgery in the ambulatory setting provides a more comfortable environment for the patient, ease of scheduling for the physician, and decreased costs. Avoiding the use of general anesthesia allows for quicker recovery, shorter length of hospital stay, and decreased rate of postoperative complications. The authors report 106 consecutive abdominoplasties, including fascial plication when indicated, using local anesthesia, with procedural sedation and analgesia. All procedures were performed with an anesthesiologist providing intraoperative monitoring of the patients. Their protocol uses procedural sedation and analgesia, which results in a depressed level of consciousness, but allows the patient to maintain airway control independently and continuously. The results of this approach were measured in terms of procedure time, length of hospital stay, rate of complications, total recovery time, and the level of patient satisfaction. Between January 1996 and January 1999, 106 patients underwent abdominoplasty (performed by one of the authors) under local anesthesia with procedural sedation and analgesia. All patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 1 to 3, and underwent a full abdominoplasty, including fascial plication. In 26% of the patients, allied procedures were also performed, most commonly liposuction or augmentation mammaplasty. The mean age in this series was 45 years, and all patients were available for follow-up at least 1 year after surgery. The mean operative time was 135 minutes, recovery room time was 68 minutes, and all patients were ambulatory. There were no surgical complications, including flap loss or wound dehiscence, and no complications related to anesthesia (cardiac, deep vein thrombosis, fat emboli, pulmonary embolism, etc.). Because paralytic agents were not used, none of the patients required catheterization postoperatively. Patients were generally pleased with the results of surgery. Although the extent of the surgery remains the same, this approach provided patients with an easier postoperative experience. In summary, abdominoplasty, including full fascial plication of the rectus and external oblique aponeurosis, can be performed safely and comfortably under local anesthesia with procedural sedation and analgesia. Patients are comfortable, recover quickly, and are very satisfied with their surgical result and overall experience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.