The reconstruction, repair, and regeneration of the external auricular framework continue to be one of the greatest challenges in the field of tissue engineering. To replace like with like, we should emulate the native structure and composition of auricular cartilage by combining a suitable chondrogenic cell source with an appropriate scaffold under optimal in vitro and in vivo conditions. Due to the fact that a suitable and reliable substitute for auricular cartilage has yet to be engineered, hand-carved autologous costal cartilage grafts and ear-shaped porous polyethylene implants are the current treatment modalities for auricular reconstruction. However, over the last decade, significant advances have been made in the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. A variety of scaffolds and innovative approaches have been investigated as alternatives to using autologous carved costal cartilage or porous polyethylene implants. A review of recent developments and the current state of the art and science is presented, focusing on scaffolds, cell sources, seeding densities, and mechanical characteristics of tissue-engineered auricular cartilage.
Engineered cartilage composed of a patient's own cells can become a feasible option for auricular reconstruction. However, distortion and shrinkage of ear-shaped constructs during scaffold degradation and neocartilage maturation in vivo have hindered the field. Scaffolds made of synthetic polymers often generate degradation products that cause an inflammatory reaction and negatively affect neocartilage formation in vivo. Porous collagen, a natural material, is a promising candidate; however, it cannot withstand the contractile forces exerted by skin and surrounding tissue during normal wound healing. We hypothesised that a permanent support in the form of a coiled wire embedded into a porous collagen scaffold will maintain the construct's size and ear-specific shape. Half-sized human adult ear-shaped fibrous collagen scaffolds with and without embedded coiled titanium wire were seeded with sheep auricular chondrocytes, cultured in vitro for up to 2 weeks, and implanted subcutaneously on the backs of nude mice. After 6 weeks, the dimensional changes in all implants with wire support were minimal (2.0% in length and 4.1% in width), whereas significant reduction in size occurred in the constructs without embedded wire (14.4% in length and 16.5% in width). No gross distortion occurred over the in vivo study period. There were no adverse effects on neocartilage formation from the embedded wire. Histologically, mature neocartilage extracellular matrix was observed throughout all implants. The amount of DNA, glycosaminoglycan, and hydroxyproline in the engineered cartilage were similar to that of native sheep ear cartilage. The embedded wire support was essential for avoiding shrinkage of the ear-shaped porous collagen constructs.
Despite advances in orthopedic materials, the development of drug-eluting bone and joint implants that can sustain the delivery of the drug and maintain the necessary mechanical strength in order to withstand loading has remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that modifying the eccentricity of drug clusters and the percolation threshold in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) results in maximized drug elution and in the retention of mechanical strength. The optimized UHMWPE eluted antibiotic at a higher concentration for longer than the clinical gold standard antibiotic-eluting bone cement while retaining the mechanical and wear properties of clinically used UHMWPE joint prostheses. Treatment of lapine knees infected with Staphylococcus aureus with the antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE led to complete bacterial eradication and to the absence of detectable systemic effects. We argue that the antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE joint implant is a promising candidate for clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.