A method (denoted SISCAPA) for quantitation of peptides in complex digests is described. In the method, anti-peptide antibodies immobilized on 100 nanoliter nanoaffinity columns are used to enrich specific peptides along with spiked stable-isotope-labeled internal standards of the same sequence. Upon elution from the anti-peptide antibody supports, electrospray mass spectrometry is used to quantitate the peptides (natural and labeled). In a series of pilot experiments, tryptic test peptides were chosen for four proteins of human plasma (hemopexin, alpha1 antichymotrypsin, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) from a pool of 10,203 in silico tryptic peptide candidates representing 237 known plasma components. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against the chosen peptide sequences were affinity purified and covalently immobilized on POROS supports. Binding and elution from these supports was shown to provide an average 120-fold enrichment of the antigen peptide relative to others, as measured by selected ion monitoring (SIM) or selected reaction monitoring (SRM) electrospray mass spectrometry. The columns could be recycled with little loss in binding capacity, and generated peptide ion current measurements with cycle-to-cycle coefficients of variation near 5%. Anti-peptide antibody enrichment will contribute to increased sensitivity of MS-based assays, particularly for lower abundance proteins in plasma, and may ultimately allow substitution of a rapid bind/elute process for the time-consuming reverse phase separation now used as a prelude to online MS peptide assays. The method appears suitable for rapid generation of assays for defined proteins, and should find application in the validation of diagnostic protein panels in large sample sets.
Mass spectrometry-based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) quantitation of proteins can dramatically impact the discovery and quantitation of biomarkers via rapid, targeted, multiplexed protein expression profiling of clinical samples. A mixture of 45 peptide standards, easily adaptable to common plasma proteomics work flows, was created to permit absolute quantitation of 45 endogenous proteins in human plasma trypsin digests. All experiments were performed on simple tryptic digests of human EDTA-plasma without prior affinity depletion or enrichment. Stable isotope-labeled standard peptides were added immediately following tryptic digestion because addition of stable isotope-labeled standard peptides prior to trypsin digestion was found to generate elevated and unpredictable results. Proteotypic tryptic peptides containing isotopically coded amino acids ( MS is capable of sensitive and accurate protein quantitation based on the quantitation of proteolytic peptides as surrogates for the corresponding intact proteins. Over the past 10 years, MS-based protein quantitation based on the analysis of peptides (in other words, based on "bottom-up" proteomics) has had a profound impact on how biological problems can be addressed (1, 2). Although advances in MS instrumentation have contributed to the improvement of MS-based protein quantitation, the use of stable isotopes in quantitative work flows has arguably had the greatest impact in improving the quality and reproducibility of MS-based protein quantitation (3-5).The ongoing development of untargeted MS-based quantitation work flows has focused on increasingly exhaustive sample prefractionation methods, at both the protein and peptide levels, with the goal of detecting and quantifying entire proteomes (6). Although untargeted MS-based quantitation work flows have their utility, they are costly in terms of lengthy MS data acquisition and analysis times, and as a result, they are often limited to quantifying differences between small sample sets (n Ͻ 10). To facilitate rapid quantitation of larger, clinically relevant sample sets (n Ͼ 100) there is a need to both simplify sample preparation and reduce MS analysis time.Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) 1 is a tandem MS (MS/MS) scan mode unique to triple quadrupole MS instrumentation that is capable of rapid, sensitive, and specific quantitation of analytes in highly complex sample matrices (7). MRM is a targeted approach that requires knowledge of the molecular weight of an 1 The abbreviations used are: MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; CE, collision energy; CV, coefficient of variation; CZE, capillary zone electrophoresis; DP, declustering potential; LOQ, limit of quantitation; Q1, quadrupole 1; Q3, quadrupole 3; SIS, stable isotope-labeled standard; XIC, extracted ion chromatogram; iTRAQ, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation. Research
Plasma biomarkers studies are based on the differential expression of proteins between different treatment groups or between diseased and control populations. Most mass spectrometry-based methods of protein quantitation, however, are based on the detection and quantitation of peptides, not intact proteins. For peptide-based protein quantitation to be accurate, the digestion protocols used in proteomic analyses must be both efficient and reproducible. There have been very few studies, however, where plasma denaturation/digestion protocols have been compared using absolute quantitation methods. In this paper, 14 combinations of heat, solvent [acetonitrile, methanol, trifluoroethanol], chaotropic agents [guanidine hydrochloride, urea], and surfactants [sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium deoxycholate (DOC)] were compared with respect to their effectiveness in improving subsequent tryptic digestion. These digestion protocols were evaluated by quantitating the production of proteotypic tryptic peptides from 45 moderate- to high-abundance plasma proteins, using tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode, with a mixture of stable-isotope labeled analogues of these proteotypic peptides as internal standards. When the digestion efficiencies of these 14 methods were compared, we found that both of the surfactants (SDS and DOC) produced an increase in the overall yield of tryptic peptides from these 45 proteins, when compared to the more commonly used urea protocol. SDS, however, can be a serious interference for subsequent mass spectrometry. DOC, on the other hand, can be easily removed from the samples by acid precipitation. Examining the results of a reproducibility study, done with 5 replicate digestions, DOC and SDS with a 9 h digestion time produced the highest average digestion efficiencies (~80%), with the highest average reproducibility (<5% error, defined as the relative deviation from the mean value). However, because of potential interferences resulting from the use of SDS, we recommend DOC with a 9 h digestion procedure as the optimum protocol.
A SISCAPA (stable isotope standards and capture by antipeptide antibodies) method for specific antibody-based capture of individual tryptic peptides from a digest of whole human plasma was developed using a simplified magnetic bead protocol and a novel rotary magnetic bead trap device. MS is the method of choice for identification of peptides in digests of biological samples based on the power of MS to detect the chemically well defined masses of both peptides and their fragments produced by processes such as CID. This high level of structural specificity is also critical in improving peptide (and protein) quantitation because it overcomes the well known problems inherent in classical immunoassays related to limited antibody specificity, dynamic range, and multiplexability. In principle, a quantitative peptide assay using MRM 1 detection in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer should have nearly absolute structural specificity, a dynamic range of ϳ1eϩ4, and the ability to multiplex measurements of hundreds of peptides per sample (1). These properties suggest that MS-based methods could ultimately replace classical immunoassay technologies in many research and clinical applications.An important limitation of present peptide MRM measurements is sensitivity. The most sensitive widely used quantitative MS platforms use nanoflow chromatography and ESI to deliver trace amounts of peptides to the mass spectrometer. However, these processes are limited in the total amount of peptide that can be applied while retaining maximum sensitivity (typically limited to ϳ1 g of total peptide sample, i.e. the product obtained from digesting ϳ14 nl of plasma). The lower cutoff for detecting proteins in a digest of unfractionated plasma by this approach appears to be in the neighborhood of 1-20 g/ml plasma concentration, which would restrict analysis to the top 100 or so proteins in plasma (1).The sensitivity of MS assays can be substantially increased by fractionating the sample at the level of intact proteins, the tryptic peptides derived from them, or both. For example, immunodepletion of the six most abundant plasma proteins, removes ϳ85% of the protein mass (2) and results in an increase of ϳ7-fold in the signal-to-noise of MRM measurements of peptides from the remaining proteins after digestion (1). Similarly chromatographic fractionation by strong cation exchange provides another major improvement in sensitivity (3). However, increased sample fractionation brings with it the disadvantages of increased cost and time, the risk of losing specific components, and the continued requirement for very high resolution (lengthy, low throughput) reversed phase nanoflow chromatography en route to the ESI source.An alternative fractionation approach, used in the SISCAPA method, enriches specific target peptides through capture by anti-peptide antibodies, thus circumventing these disadvantages for preselected targets (4). In its initial implementation, SISCAPA used very small (ϳ10-nl) columns of POROS chro-
The pollination droplet is a highly conservative pollination mechanism that is observed in all major gymnosperm taxa. Proteomics analysis of the pollination drops was carried out on four gymnosperm species: Juniperus communis (common juniper), Juniperus oxycedrus (prickly juniper), Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Port Orford cedar), and Welwitschia mirabilis. Pollination drop proteins were purified by SDS-PAGE, and the most abundant proteins were analyzed by mass spectrometry and sequenced. Based on BLAST searching of combined amino acid sequences, the following proteins were identified in the following species: an 83-kDa subtilisin-like proteinase, a 62-kDa glycosyl hydrolase, a 47.5-kDa glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase precursor, a 30-kDa chitinase, and a 25-kDa thaumatin-like protein were identified in J. communis; a 30-kDa chitinase, a 25-kDa thaumatin-like protein, and a 32.5-kDa glucanase-like protein were identified in J. oxycedrus; an 83-kDa subtilisin-like proteinase, a 62-kDa b-D-glucan exohydrolase, a 47.5-kDa glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase, and two 25-kDa thaumatin-like proteins were identified in C. lawsoniana, and a 25-kDa chitinase was identified in W. mirabilis. Based on protein identifications, there is strong evidence that the pollination drop functions in both pathogen defense and pollen development. The discovery of similarities in terms of peptide sequence and protein identifications indicates that ovular secretions are functionally conservative, and that they are essential to reproductive success.
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling methods are desirable for population-wide biomarker screening programs because of their ease of collection, transportation, and storage. Immunoassays are traditionally used to quantify endogenous proteins in these samples but require a separate assay for each protein. Recently, targeted mass spectrometry (MS) has been proposed for generating highly-multiplexed assays for biomarker proteins in DBS samples. In this work, we report the first comparison of proteins in whole blood and DBS samples using an untargeted MS approach. The average number of proteins identified in undepleted whole blood and DBS samples by liquid chromatography (LC)/MS/MS was 223 and 253, respectively. Protein identification repeatability was between 77%-92% within replicates and the majority of these repeated proteins (70%) were observed in both sample formats. Proteins exclusively identified in the liquid or dried fluid spot format were unbiased based on their molecular weight, isoelectric point, aliphatic index, and grand average hydrophobicity. In addition, we extended this comparison to include proteins in matching plasma and serum samples with their dried fluid spot equivalents, dried plasma spot (DPS), and dried serum spot (DSS). This work begins to define the accessibility of endogenous proteins in dried fluid spot samples for analysis by MS and is useful in evaluating the scope of this new approach.
Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, although endemic in many parts of Central and South America, is emerging as a global health threat through the potential contamination of blood supplies. Consequently, in the absence of a gold standard assay for the diagnosis of Chagas disease, additional antigens or strategies are needed. A proteomic analysis of the trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigens (TESA) associated with exosomal vesicles shed by T. cruzi identified ϳ80 parasite proteins, with the majority being trans-sialidases. Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitation products performed using Chagas immune sera showed a marked enrichment in a subset of TESA proteins. Of particular relevance for diagnostic applications were the retrotransposon hot spot (RHS) proteins, which are absent in Leishmania spp., parasites that often confound diagnosis of Chagas disease. Interestingly, serological screens using recombinant RHS showed a robust immunoreactivity with sera from patients with clinical stages of Chagas ranging from asymptomatic to advance cardiomyopathy and this immunoreactivity was comparable to that of crude TESA. More importantly, no cross-reactivity with RHS was detected with sera from patients with malaria, leishmaniasis, toxoplasmosis, or African sleeping sickness, making this protein an attractive reagent for diagnosis of Chagas disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.