Cytidine 5’-diphosphocholine has been widely studied in systemic neurodegenerative diseases, like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and brain ischemia. The rationale for the use of citicoline in ophthalmological neurodegenerative diseases, including glaucoma, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and diabetic retinopathy, is founded on its multifactorial mechanism of action and the involvement in several metabolic pathways, including phospholipid homeostasis, mitochondrial dynamics, as well as cholinergic and dopaminergic transmission, all being involved in the complexity of the visual transmission. This narrative review is aimed at reporting both pre-clinical data regarding the involvement of citicoline in such metabolic pathways (including new insights about its role in the intracellular proteostasis through an interaction with the proteasome) and its effects on clinical psychophysical, electrophysiological, and morphological outcomes following its use in ophthalmological neurodegenerative diseases (including the results of the most recent prospective randomized clinical trials).

Purpose To evaluate the penetration of levofloxacin and dexamethasone sodium phosphate into the aqueous humour (AH) after administration in combination and as single molecules. Evaluation of the penetration of those agents in the site of action and their pharmacodynamic potential activity in view of the intended clinical use after cataract surgery. Methods Randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel-group. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to: levofloxacin + dexamethasone sodium phosphate (L-DSP), Levofloxacin (L) or Dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP) eye drops. Either test or reference drugs were instilled in the cul-de-sac twice, 90 and 60 min before paracentesis. Results A total of 125 patients completed the study. Fraction of dose absorbed in the anterior chamber was 3.8-4.2 • 10 −4 for levofloxacin and 0.3-0.4 • 10 −4 for dexamethasone, respectively. No notable differences in concentration of levofloxacin were found between L-DSP arm (1.970 nmol/ml) and L arm (2.151 nmol/ml). The concentrations of levofloxacin were well above the MICs for the most frequent Gram-positive and Gram-negative eye pathogens. Dexamethasone concentrations were slightly lower in L-DSP arm (0.030 nmol/ml) than in DSP arm (0.042 nmol/ml), but still in the pharmacodynamically active range in the site of action. The difference was not clinically relevant. DSP was not detected in any HA sample, suggesting its full hydrolysis to free dexamethasone. Conclusion Our results confirm that no interaction is evident on the corneal penetration of levofloxacin and dexamethasone which reach pharmacologically active concentrations when instilled as fixed combination eye drops to patients undergoing cataract surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03740659

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) after cataract surgery, and the impact of hyaluronic acid and ginkgo biloba eyedrops (HA-GB). Methods: Forty patients with no DED received Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, assessment of conjunctival hyperemia and epithelial damage, fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT) at baseline, day 1, week 1, and 4; adherence and tolerability were checked at weeks 1 and 4. At day 0 patients underwent cataract surgery and were randomized to standard postoperative care (control group) or standard postoperative care + HA-GB 3 times a day for 4 weeks (HA-GB group). Results: At baseline, TBUT was 9.6 ± 2.6 sec in controls and 9.0 ± 1.6 in HA-GB; thereafter it was higher in HA-GB group: 5.8 ± 2.3 versus 7.8 ± 3.2 (week 1, P = 0.03) and 6.4 ± 2.3 versus 8.5 ± 2.5 (week 4, P = 0.009). OSDI and conjunctival hyperemia were better in HA-GB group at week 4; respectively, 9.0 ± 5.7 versus 14.8 ± 7.3 ( P = 0.004) and 5% versus 35% ( P = 0.04). In the last 2 visits 50% of controls were symptomatic (OSDI of 13 or higher) compared with 16% on HA-GB group ( P < 0.001). In addition, tolerability was higher in HA-GB group (week 1: 0.81 ± 0.20 versus 0.70 ± 0.24, P = 0.007; week 4: 0.93 ± 0.17 versus 0.80 ± 0.28, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Treatment with HA-GB is effective in reducing DED signs and symptoms in patients receiving cataract surgery, with high tolerability and safety profiles. (ID number NCT05002036).