This article examines the impact of federal, state, and local policies on the roles that elementary school teachers are asked to assume inside and outside the classroom. Through a detailed analysis of changes in teacher tasks over a 4-year period, the authors determined that role expectations increased, intensified, and expanded in four areas: instructional, institutional, collaborative, and learning. These changes had unanticipated, and often negative, consequences for teachers’ relationships with students, pedagogy, and sense of professional well-being. The authors use one policy directive, differentiated instruction, to illustrate the complexity of role demands currently made of teachers, and they draw implications for policy and research.
Context The desire to provide useful, research-based information to policy makers and teachers poses a series of challenges for education researchers. These challenges include striking a balance between complexity and simplicity in the portrayal of teaching, addressing the potential conditional nature of what constitutes quality teaching, and appreciating the multiple perspectives by which quality teaching might be judged. Purpose This article uses a mixed-methods approach to discuss these three challenges. We describe our own attempts to address these challenges in a longitudinal study of reading and mathematics instruction in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in moderate- to high-poverty schools, provide a mixed-methods analysis to identify the conditional nature of quality in teaching, report our results, and discuss implications for future studies of teaching. Research Design We focus on data that examined mathematics instruction in fourth and fifth grades during the 2004–2005 school year, including student academic records, observations about mathematics lessons, teachers’ curriculum logs, and interviews with teachers about the challenges that they face in providing quality instruction to their students. After limiting the data to students with scores on the state-mandated assessments, we had a total of 1,074 students taught by 63 different teachers in 66 different classes in the analytic sample. We examine the effects of teacher instructional practices on student achievement in classrooms with moderate and high levels of children from low-income families, using multilevel modeling; we then use interviews with teachers and specialists to better interpret the results of the quantitative analysis. Conclusions What constitutes quality teaching, at least as judged by achievement gains, is contingent on students’ instructional needs. Although students in classes where teachers reported greater variability in the number of curriculum topics covered had lower levels of achievement, the effects of teacher actions and lesson content depended on the poverty status of the class. Examination of the qualitative data suggests that an important indicator of quality is the ability of teachers to navigate successfully the policy environment for their stu-dents—in this case, the ability to meet the demands of a newly implemented curriculum and the assessment timeline— and still present students with a coherent and appropriate set of lessons. Our analysis also indicates that students in majority-poverty classes are more dependent on their teachers to mediate the curriculum and provide multiple representations of mathematics, whereas students in moderate-poverty classes are better able to access mathematical knowledge through textbooks, standard worksheets, and more complex lesson content. A mixed-methods approach to studying teaching increases the likelihood of capturing the complexity of teaching but also highlights the importance of balancing complexity with the need for useful information for policy makers and practitioners.
ContextPolicy makers have long used policy tools to influence various components of the education system. The passage of No Child Left Behind increased the federal role and the focus on student outcome measures. This change in the policy environment can affect not only teachers and teaching but researchers and research on teaching as well.PurposeThis article examines ways in which the current policy context influences teaching and explores the challenges these influences pose for research on teaching. To illustrate this potential policy impact, we focus on three core dimensions of teaching: who is the teacher, is teaching practice stable or changing, and what constitutes teaching quality.Research DesignWe draw on our High-Quality Teaching study of fourth- and fifth-grade reading and mathematics instruction. For this article, we analyzed classroom observation data, teacher logs of curriculum coverage, and focus group interviews with school personnel. We pay particular attention to changes in instruction over time and in different contexts.ConclusionsAlthough we anticipated that policy pressures might influence conceptions of teaching quality, we were surprised by the scope of these influences. Our findings indicate underreported, multiple influences on student learning due to both local and federal policies; unexpected changes in what is taught and in what kind of teaching occurs within the school day, throughout the year, and across years; and narrowing conceptions of teaching quality. Policy influences on these core dimensions challenge researchers to specify more carefully who is responsible for teaching whom, maintain flexibility in data collection, retain research participants across years, and examine alternative conceptions of quality teaching.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.