Objective To determine whether the use of perioperative gabapentin reduces postoperative pain and anxiety, decreases ropivacaine consumption and side effects, and improves patient satisfaction. Design Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial. Blinding Participants, care providers, investigators, data analysts. Setting Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Rabka Zdrój Branch, Poland. Subjects Forty patients undergoing the Ravitch procedure. Methods Patients aged nine to 17 years were randomized into a gabapentin (preoperative 15 mg/kg, treatment) or placebo group. Postoperative analgesia included gabapentin (7.5 mg/kg) or placebo two times per day for three days, epidural ropivacaine + fentanyl, paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and metamizol as a “rescue drug.” Pain, anxiety, analgesic consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results There was no statistically significant difference in median pain scores (numerical rating scale < 1/10) or incidence of adverse side effects between the gabapentin group (N = 20) and the placebo group (N = 20). Postoperative anxiety scores were significantly lower than before surgery in the gabapentin group (6 [4–8] vs 7 [6–8.5], P < 0.01) and remained unchanged in the placebo group (6 [5–6.5] vs 6 [5–7], P = 0.07). Gabapentin-treated patients received a lower number of doses of ondansetron when compared with the placebo group (6 [5–6] vs 7 [6–9], P = 0.02). A significant negative association was found between patient satisfaction and postoperative state anxiety in the gabapentin group (R = –0.51, P = 0.02). Conclusions Perioperative administration of gabapentin resulted in a decrease of postoperative anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing the Ravitch procedure.

No abstract

Aims. (1) To compare the efficacy of bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative pain control (2). To identify the predictors of acute post-operative pain at rest, during deep breathing and coughing. Methods. The study was performed in patients aged 6-18 years after thoracic surgery. The subjects were randomized to the bupivacaine 0.125%/fentanyl 5.0 μg/mL (n=46) or ropivacaine 0.2%/fentanyl 5.0 μg/mL (n=48) group; analgesic mixtures were administered through epidural catheter. All the patients received paracetamol and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The observation period after surgery lasted 72 h. Pain intensity was assessed at rest, during deep breathing and coughing and was based on the Numerical Rating Scale and the FLACC scale (range 0-10). If the pain was above 2/10, the analgesia was modified. Results. Median pain scores at rest (0.4 vs. 0.5), during deep breathing (0.3 vs. 0.3) and coughing (0.6 vs. 0.6) were comparable in BF and RF group. The intensity of pain at rest was associated with the number of drains inserted into the thorax (β=0.39), the number of pain intensity measurements (β=0.36) and the number of nursing interventions undertaken to relieve pain (β=0.16). Pain intensity at rest determined the intensity of pain during deep breathing (β=0.60), which in turn decided on the severity of pain during coughing (β=0.80). The intensity of pain was increased by age. Conclusions. Thoracic epidural bupivacaine/fentanyl provided adequate pain relief and similar analgesia to ropivacaine/fentanyl. The effectiveness of analgesia depended on the number of pain measurements and interventions by nurses to relieve the pain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Multimodal Analgesia in Children and Adolescents After the Ravitch Procedure and Thoracotomy; NCT03444636;

The aim of the study was to investigate whether the use of pre- and postoperative gabapentin can decrease postoperative pain, morphine consumption, anxiety and side effects, as well as improve patient satisfaction. A total of 56 patients, 9–17 years of age, undergoing a modified Ravitch procedure, were randomised (allocation ratio 1:1) to receive multiple perioperative doses of gabapentin (preoperatively 15 mg/kg, postoperatively 7.5 mg/kg, two times per day for three days) or a placebo. All the patients received intravenous infusion of morphine, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Metamizole was given as a “rescue drug”. The observation period included the day of surgery and three postoperative days. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity (at rest, during deep breathing and coughing). Additional outcomes included the consumption of morphine, the total number of doses of metamizole, anxiety, postoperative side effects and patient satisfaction. Median average and maximal pain scores (on the day of surgery and on the second postoperative day) were significantly lower only in the gabapentin group at rest (p < 0.05). Compared to the placebo group, gabapentin treatment reduced the demand for morphine on the first postoperative day (median 0.016 vs. 0.019 mg/kg/h; p = 0.03) and the total number of metamizole doses (median 1 vs. 2 p = 0.04). Patient satisfaction was significantly greater in the gabapentin group (median 10 vs. 9; p = 0.018). Anxiety and postoperative side effects were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Pre- and postoperative gabapentin administration as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen may decrease postoperative pain, opioid consumption and demand for a “rescue drug”, as well as improve patient satisfaction.

This narrative qualitative research study explored the experiences and understanding of whiteness from three full-time white students at Ryerson University (RU). The theoretical framework draws from Critical Whiteness Studies (CWS) and Critical Whiteness Pedagogy (CWP). Based on existing literature on whiteness, this study utilized semi-structured telephone interviews with the three participants. The participants were randomly selected through recruitment posting and flyers on social media outlets such as Facebook. Data analysis included a thematic and structure of the narratives of the participants. The findings provided insight into how these white students at RU define whiteness and how they understand whiteness demonstrated in academia and, lastly, whether they have perpetrated or fought against whiteness within their academic institution. The results indicate that whiteness is not easily defined, and academia is incorporating diverse perspectives. This paper concludes with implications and discussion on future social work, followed by the conclusion. Key words: Academia, Critical Whiteness Studies, Critical Whiteness Pedagogy, colonialization, gender, whiteness, white students,