A retrospective analysis of 390 determinate radical neck dissections (RND) performed for cancers of the mouth, pharynx, and larynx was carried out. There were 75 patients (19%) who had a modified RND. These were separately analyzed and the outcome was compared to those who had a standard total RND. Our goal was to assess the effectiveness of modified RND in controlling disease in the neck, and to identify its impact on survival and quality of life. Overall neck recurrence rate in the entire modified RND group was 28%, 35% in the partial RND, and 25% in the comprehensive modified RND. Neck recurrence rate was no worse in the comprehensive modified RND for N0 and N1 cases, but increased significantly (as compared to the group of patients with standard RND) in the N2 and N3 cases (52% vs. 33%). Treatment of neck recurrences following modified RND was primarily by surgery, with a 48% 3-year disease-free survival. Overall survival was the same for modified RND (68%) and for standard total RND (63%). This was true for all N stages individually. The morbidity of standard total RND is discussed and the goals of modified RND are analyzed. Definitions and a standardized nomenclature for the various types of modified RND are suggested for uniformity of reporting.

Duplex ultrasonography is an accepted method to assess noninvasively arterial inflow to the penis. Optimal pharmacological agents as well as timing of the scan and stimulation during the scan continue to be debated. In an effort to achieve a more complete smooth muscle relaxation and capture what we perceived was a wide variation in interval to maximum arterial velocity, we revised our duplex protocol in January 1991. We report on 280 consecutive patients evaluated in this manner. Patients received 0.25 or 0.5 cc of a triple drug mixture containing 22.5 mg./cc papaverine, 0.83 mg./cc phentolamine and 8.33 micrograms/cc prostaglandin E1. Scans were performed at 0, 5, 15 and 30 minutes after injection in all patients. Any patient not having a full erection at 15 minutes performed private self-stimulation while in the standing position for at least 5 minutes before the 30-minute scan. If we conservatively define normal arterial inflow as a peak Doppler velocity of 25 cm. per second or greater in the best artery, only 35% of our patients achieved this velocity at 5 minutes. Of the remainder 26% and 22% did not reach normal velocity values until 15 and 30 minutes, respectively, after the injection. By delaying initial measurements of velocity until 5 minutes, could the highest inflow velocity be missed and patients diagnosed incorrectly? The group at risk would be those who had good tumescence at 5 minutes and who had presumably already decreased the inflow velocities. Of the 280 patients 74 (26%) had greater than 10% tumescence at 5 minutes. Only 6 of these 74 patients did not reach velocities of 25 cm. per second or more in the best artery at some time during their study. In conclusion, our study clearly supports delaying the initial scan until 5 minutes, since only 6 of our 280 patients (2.1%) may have been incorrectly diagnosed. The study also strongly argues for additional scans until 30 minutes and self-stimulation when necessary.

Duplex ultrasonography is an accepted method to assess noninvasively arterial inflow to the penis. Optimal pharmacological agents as well as timing of the scan and stimulation during the scan continue to be debated. In an effort to achieve a more complete smooth muscle relaxation and capture what we perceived was a wide variation in interval to maximum arterial velocity, we revised our duplex protocol in January 1991. We report on 280 consecutive patients evaluated in this manner. Patients received 0.25 or 0.5 cc of a triple drug mixture containing 22.5 mg./cc papaverine, 0.83 mg./cc phentolamine and 8.33 micrograms/cc prostaglandin E1. Scans were performed at 0, 5, 15 and 30 minutes after injection in all patients. Any patient not having a full erection at 15 minutes performed private self-stimulation while in the standing position for at least 5 minutes before the 30-minute scan. If we conservatively define normal arterial inflow as a peak Doppler velocity of 25 cm. per second or greater in the best artery, only 35% of our patients achieved this velocity at 5 minutes. Of the remainder 26% and 22% did not reach normal velocity values until 15 and 30 minutes, respectively, after the injection. By delaying initial measurements of velocity until 5 minutes, could the highest inflow velocity be missed and patients diagnosed incorrectly? The group at risk would be those who had good tumescence at 5 minutes and who had presumably already decreased the inflow velocities. Of the 280 patients 74 (26%) had greater than 10% tumescence at 5 minutes. Only 6 of these 74 patients did not reach velocities of 25 cm. per second or more in the best artery at some time during their study. In conclusion, our study clearly supports delaying the initial scan until 5 minutes, since only 6 of our 280 patients (2.1%) may have been incorrectly diagnosed. The study also strongly argues for additional scans until 30 minutes and self-stimulation when necessary.

No abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for the management of large renal stones. This technique enjoys a high success rate with minimal complications being reported. Case Presentation:We present a 54-year-old female who underwent a PCNL procedure on her right kidney and returned several months later with anxiety regarding vague left flank discomfort. Radiographic imaging done to assuage the patient's concerns surprisingly demonstrated a hyperdense curvilinear object in the mid-pole calyx of the right kidney. After an unsuccessful ureteroscopic extraction approach in the operating room, Interventional Radiology was consulted for foreign body extraction through a percutaneous access approach.Conclusion: This is the only known case in literature to report a plastic sheath fragment as a foreign body in the renal collecting system after PCNL. We attempted to offer possible hypotheses for the source of this foreign body. The authors also emphasize the need for attentiveness during surgical procedures to monitor and identify integrity flaws that may exist in the instruments and ancillaries used.