The article examines the issue of the limits of freedom of expression of representatives of the professional legal community in public spaces on the example of the case "Sokolov case". The goal is to explore the "spontaneous" regulation of ethical issues of legal practice in modern interactive realities. The task is a study of the specific disciplinary proceedings of one of the regional professional legal community. The authors demonstrate the fact that in a particular case the "eternal questions of the Bar" are doctrinally investigated: the scope of the council's disciplinary authority, the distance between the bar and the state, commercial and charitable in the bar. Conclusions: in the "Sokolov case" the council defended the right to freedom of speech of lawyers in the network, delineating the scope of this right-the lawyer is forbidden to distribute statements containing foul language. At the same time, this case opened Pandora's box, which shattered the whole organization of the professional legal community in Russia.
Introduction: in recent years, there has been a rapid change in the paradigm of the development of state-legal relations concerning new technological solutions. At the present stage, researchers use the term GovTech, giving an assessment of the current social state. The scientific characteristic of the category “GovTech” (GOSTECH) and the identification of its correlation with the category “electronic government” are required. Purpose: to give an overview of the category “GovTech” (GOSTECH), to determine the degree of correlation with the category “electronic government”, to identify the examples of the implementation of GovTech in Russia. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is made up of the general scientific methods – analysis and synthesis, as well as the specific scientific methods – formal legal and comparative legal. Results: the term GovTech is quite new to the legal scientific discourse and at the moment there are no definitions formed within scientific discussion. However, the context of using this term refers to the transformation of state-legal reality primarily in the context of interaction between public authorities and the population, increasing convenience, openness and increasing opportunities to influence decision-making. Conclusions: the category GovTech (GOSTECH) has been introduced into scientific use and is used in regulatory legal acts. At the same time, the question of the essential content of the term remains open. Due to the examples given in the Russian Federation, it can be concluded that at the moment GovTech is a qualitatively new stage in the development of electronic government.
In this article, the author conducted the research of the evolution of the institution of municipal service in Russian legislation and made a comparative analysis of the objective and subjective interpretations of this category. The author analyzed the relationship between the state civil and municipal services and concluded that it is possible to fix the concept of "public service" in the legislation. The author also outlined the ways of further development of the Institute of municipal service under the influence of the digital society and the national program "Digital economy of Russia".
Introduction: the variety of interpretations of the category “municipal service” gives rise to semantic diversity and variability of interpretation of the concept. In this regard, the authors aim to conduct a historical research and comparative analysis of existing approaches to the definition of “municipal service”, presented in the legislation and legal science. Methods: the methodological framework for this study, which has a complex character, is a set of methods of scientific knowledge, among which the main ones are the comparative-historical, general scientific dialectical, logical-syntactic, and semantic methods of cognition, as well as the methods of cause and effect analysis, forecasting, synthesis and analysis. Results: in the paper the authors reveal the debatable aspect of the correctness of the use of the term “permanent basis” as a fundamental feature of the concept of “municipal service”, reveal its fundamental features, and study the semantic and syntactic meaning. Conclusions: the authors conclude that the cause of the variable interpretation of the concept under study in both objective and subjective senses is the interaction of these two sides of a single phenomenon, outside of which the statutory will cannot exist and be put into practice. The ways of further research in connection with the presence of the debatable theoretical legal category “public service” are also outlined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.