No abstract

Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website. TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. Abstract: To meet greenhouse gas emission targets, at global, national and sector level, reduction opportunities should be explored in both the embodied and operational carbon of the built environment. One underexploited option to reduce embodied carbon is the reuse of structural steel. However, in the UK, work by Sansom and Avery (2014) suggests a picture of declining levels of reuse. This paper explores why this is the case by identifying the practical barriers to structural steel reuse through a series of semi-structured interviews with UK construction industry members. Whilst there were many identified barriers, five practical barriers were prioritised as being most significant: cost, availability/storage, no client demand, traceability and supply chain gaps/lack of integration. These contrast with those most commonly identified in global literature: cost, supply chain gaps/integration, risk, jointing technique, composite construction and time for deconstruction; with only two overlaps: cost and supply chain gaps/integration. Many of the barriers from literature have a technical focus (reducing salvage yield rather than completely preventing reuse) differing from the largely systemic barriers that the interviews prioritised. These systemic barriers will need to be dealt with first to increase reuse rates. This will require a coordinated approach across the UK construction supply chain. Building on interview insights, this paper proposes four mechanisms to overcome these systemic barriers: (1) the creation of a database of suppliers/reused section availability, (2) a demonstration of client demand (3) technical guidance and education for the construction industry and (4) government leadership. Together these mechanisms would improve reuse rates in the UK, reduce the embodied emissions of the built environment and play a crucial role in meeting greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.

This paper outlines the importance of taking a whole life-cycle approach when considering the sustainability of buildings, with an emphasis on consideration of the embodied carbon of projects and minimising this when possible. It is suggested that this can be achieved through the specification of reused materials. In order to improve the reused material supply chain in the future it is recommended that new buildings be designed for later deconstruction, thereby maximising the quantity of materials that can be recovered with minimal damage. Strategies for most effectively designing for deconstruction are outlined. It is recommended that this type of design practice be promoted by specific inclusion within environmental assessment methods. A brief review of three current assessment methods is made to highlight where credits are rewarded for the minimisation of embodied energy, and several tools that may help designers in assessing the embodied carbon of their projects are discussed.

No abstract

Environmental impacts of precast, composite and cast-in-situ slabs are conducted. All life cycle stages from cradle-to-grave (including end-of-life stage) are included. Both midpoint and endpoint of LCA results are analyzed. The floor slabs are designed based on two functional units. Uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis are carried out.