Three adult baboons were trained using a psychophysical procedure to discriminate between different synthetic vowel sounds [symbol: see text]. Baboons pressed and held a lever down to produce a pulsed train of a single reference vowel that served as the standard stimulus. Animals were trained to release the lever only when this standard vowel sound changed to one of the four remaining comparison vowels. A lever release within 1.5 s of this change in vowel sounds was defined as a correct detection of the change from the standard vowel to one of the comparison vowels, and was reinforced. All baboons readily learned the vowel discriminations and detected vowel changes at the 90-100% correct performance level. Acute IM administration of cocaine prior to test sessions (0.00032-3.2 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent decrements in vowel discriminability. At the same time, cocaine shortened lever release latencies (reaction times) to the vowel stimuli in two of three baboons. The cocaine-induced decrements in vowel discriminability were correlated with the degree to which frequency differences occurred among the different vowels in that lower vowel discriminability scores were found for those vowels with smaller spectral differences from the standard vowel. Further, false alarm rates were not systematically affected by cocaine, indicating that the cocaine-induced decrements in vowel discrimination accuracy occurred in the absence of systematic changes in the reliability of the baboons' discrimination performances.
The effects of cocaine and quinpirole were studied in baboons to determine whether quinpirole, a relatively selective D2/D3 dopamine agonist, produced effects similar to those of cocaine on perceptual and motor processes. To measure perceptual and motor function, three baboons were trained to discriminate differences between a standard vowel and four other synthetic vowels: response accuracy as well as response latencies, or "reaction times", were measured following drug administrations. Cocaine reduced reaction times in two baboons, and did not affect reaction times in a third; on the other hand, quinpirole lengthened reaction times in a dose-dependent manner in all baboons. Cocaine and quinpirole also differed in the time course to produce the maximal reaction time effect following drug administration. Cocaine and quinpirole did not differ consistently in their perceptual effects, as indicated by similar changes in d', a signal-detection index of discriminability. These distinct profiles of effects for cocaine and quinpirole suggest differing neurochemical actions for these two drugs.
The effects of cocaine on speech sound discriminations was examined to determine whether cocaine's previously demonstrated effect in reducing speech sound discriminability was dependent upon either the type of stimuli employed (simple tones versus complex speech) or the procedure (stimulus detection versus stimulus discrimination). Because of demonstrated similarities in the way that baboons and humans discriminate speech, and in the way the CNS is thought to encode and process speech sounds in these two species, baboons were trained to perform a choice procedure to identify the occurrence of different synthetic vowel sounds (see text). Animals held down a lever and released the lever only when one of four target vowels sounded, and not when a fifth, standard vowel sounded. Acute IM administration of cocaine (0.0032-1.0 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent decreases in vowel discriminability that were mostly due to elevations in false alarms (i.e., releases to the standard vowel) following cocaine. Cocaine also shortened reaction times to the stimuli in two of three baboons, but to a much lesser extent than observed previously. These results suggest that cocaine may interfere with the ability of the CNS to process the acoustic cues in speech sounds, and that the effects of cocaine on reaction times may depend upon the complexity of the reaction time procedure employed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright 漏 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 馃挋 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.