No abstract

No abstract

Flavonols are known for causing undesirable deposits in both red and white wines. Among flavonols, quercetin is widely considered the principal factor determining this phenomenon. One of the most accredited hypotheses claims that glycosylated derivatives of quercetin undergo hydrolysis of the glycosylic bond during the fermentation and the wine ageing, releasing quercetin aglycone, which is much less soluble in water solution and causes the precipitation. Our work describes the dynamics of quercetin-derived deposition in Chianti wines and purposes a new method, based on the enzymatic quercetin glycoside hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond, to prevent the unpleasant deposit formation during the wine ageing. In our study, forty-four monovarietal wines obtained from 7 different Italian grape varieties were compared in the content of total quercetin-3-glycosides (rutin, quercetin-3-glucuronide, quercetin-3-glucoside) and quercetin aglycone. The data confirmed the literature revealing Sangiovese as the richest in quercetin. We tested then, in a Sangiovese wine, four fining agents (PVPP, PVPP/PVI, bentonite and a vegetal protein) for quercetin removal, showing that only the PVPP had a modest aglycone removal activity. Then, the kinetics of deposit formation was studied in three Chianti wines which differed in the initial content of quercetin aglycone. This investigation highlighted that the chemical equilibrium of quercetin changes over time as the turbidity slowly increases, as previously documented. The comparison of the three dynamics also permitted us to conclude that different wines show a different ability to keep in solution quercetin. Finally, a new approach for deposit prevention was studied by a precocious Chianti wine treatment with a pectolytic enzyme having secondary glycosidase activity. This enzyme significantly accelerated the hydrolysis of glycosylated quercetins into their aglycone, which could enhance the deposition before bottling, without serious wine colour depletion. Our study represents the first evidence of the promising potential of using the pectolytic enzyme with secondary glycosidase activity to prevent quercetin deposit during Chianti ageing, in a way that is compatible with organic wine production.

Analytical determinations for selected parameters in grapes/wines help planning technology treatments in the vineyards and cellars, improving the quality of final products and preserving consumers’ health. The study first reports a comparative analysis for selected parameters on juice, must, and wines at alcoholic and malolactic fermentation stages, from 2013 harvest and refined bottled wines from 2010–2012 and 2015 vintages. This was considered preliminary to the main goal of the work that consisted of testing if the contents of certain antioxidant principles were influenced or not by additions of copper(II) and/or selected fermentation yeasts. Particular attention was devoted to antioxidant molecule contents: total polyphenols, anthocyanins, trans-resveratrol, and quercetin. Selected samples were then analyzed in absence and in presence excess Cu(II)-sulfate (5 mgCu/L) and/or yeast derivatives to evaluate possible effects on antioxidant concentrations. The total polyphenols contents in untreated wine samples were as high as 3334 ± 60 mg (gallic acid)/L and averaged 2883 ± 299 mg/L (wines 2010–2013 and 2015). In particular, high contents of quercetin and quercetin glucoside were found in Sangiovese/Canaiolo/Colorino (harvest 2015) wine, being 21 ± 2 and 3.0 ± 0.2 mg/L, respectively. Even resveratrol had high concentrations in 100% Sangiovese wine (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/L, harvest 2015; 2.6 ± 0.3 mg/L, harvest 2010). Interestingly, no significant effect was revealed by Cu(II) and/or yeast derivatives on antioxidant contents for wine matrixes. In fact, determinations (validated through the standard addition methods) of trans-resveratrol for untreated Sangiovese wines (1.18 ± 0.09 mg/L) and for wines treated with excess Cu(II) and excess Cu(II) plus excess yeasts mixtures (1.24 ± 0.09 mg/L and 1.22 ± 0.05 mg/L) did not differ significantly.