: MRI largely outperformed mammography, ultrasonography, and their combination for screening high-risk women below and over 50.

Mowat-Wilson syndrome (MWS; OMIM #235730) is a genetic condition caused by heterozygous mutations or deletions of the ZEB2 gene, and characterized by typical face, moderate-to-severe mental retardation, epilepsy, Hirschsprung disease, and multiple congenital anomalies, including genital anomalies (particularly hypospadias in males), congenital heart defects, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and eye defects. Since the first delineation by Mowat et al. [Mowat et al. (1998); J Med Genet 35:617-623], approximately 179 patients with ZEB2 mutations, deletions or cytogenetic abnormalities have been reported primarily from Europe, Australia and the United States. Genetic defects include chromosome 2q21-q23 microdeletions (or different chromosome rearrangements) in few patients, and ZEB2 mutations in most. We report on clinical and genetic data from 19 Italian patients, diagnosed within the last 5 years, including six previously published, and compare them with patients already reported. The main purpose of this review is to underline a highly consistent phenotype and to highlight the phenotypic evolution occurring with age, particularly of the facial characteristics. The prevalence of MWS is likely to be underestimated. Knowledge of the phenotypic spectrum of MWS and of its changing phenotype with age can improve the detection rate of this condition.

No abstract

41BAP1 germline mutations predispose to a cancer predisposition syndrome that includes 42 mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma and other cancers. This co-occurrence 43 suggests that these tumors share a common carcinogenic pathway. To evaluate this hypothesis, we 44 studied 40 Italian families with mesothelioma and/or melanoma. The probands were sequenced for 45BAP1and for the most common melanoma predisposition genes (i.e. CDKN2A, CDK4, TERT, MITF 46 and POT1) to investigate if these genes may also confer susceptibility to mesothelioma. 47In two out of six families with both mesothelioma and melanoma we identified either a germline 48 nonsense mutation (c.1153C>T, p.Arg385*) in BAP1 or a recurrent pathogenic germline mutation 49 (c.301G>T, p.Gly101Trp) in CDKN2A. 50Our study suggests that CDKN2A, in addition to BAP1, could be involved in the melanoma and 51 mesothelioma susceptibility, leading to the rare familial cancer syndromes. It also suggests that 52 these tumors share key steps that drive carcinogenesis and that other genes may be involved in 53 inherited predisposition to malignant mesothelioma and melanoma.

BackgroundAt least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care.MethodsFollowing the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice.ConclusionsThere are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.