SUMMARY BackgroundPsoriasis is an emerging paradoxical side effect in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when treated with anti-TNF alpha. Patients with severe skin lesions unresponsive to topical therapy need to withdraw from treatment.
Infliximab was more effective than azathioprine in reducing histological, but not endoscopic and clinical recurrence after curative ileocolonic resection in "high risk" CD patients.
HBV and HCV infection rates were similar to infection rates among the general population. Less than one quarter of the patients had been vaccinated against HBV. Anti-TNF-α agents appear to be safe for patients with HBV infection; more data are needed for patients with HCV infection.
Background and Aims
Our first objective was to evaluate the immune response to the adjuvanted 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic (pH1N1) vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with anti-TNF-α alone or combined with immunosuppressants (IS). Second and third aims were the safety of pH1N1 vaccine and the effects on IBD clinical activity.
Methods
36 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 26 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and thirty-one healthy control subjects (HC) were enrolled. 47 patients were on anti TNF-α maintenance monotherapy and 15 on anti TNF-α combined with IS. Sera were collected at baseline (T0) and 4 weeks after the vaccination (T1) for antibody determination by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI Disease activity was monitored at T0 and T1.
Results
Seroprotective titers (≥ 1: 40) in patients were comparable to HC. Seroconvertion rate (≥ 4 fold increase in HAI titer) was lower than HC in IBD patients (p=0,009), either on anti TNF-α monotherapy (p=0,034) or combined with IS (p=0,011). Geometric mean titer (GMT) of antibodies at T1 was significantly lower in patients on combined therapy versus those on monotherapy (p=0,0017) and versus HC (p=0,011). The factor increase of GMT at T1 versus T0 was significantly lower in IBD patients versus HC (p=0,042), and in those on combined immunosuppression, both versus monotherapy (p=0,0048) and HC (p=0,0015). None of the patients experienced a disease flare.
Conclusion
Our study has shown a suboptimal response to pH1N1 vaccine in IBD patients on therapy with anti TNF-α and IS compared to those on anti-TNF-α monotherapy and HC.
VDZ is similarly effective in ant-TNF-naïve CD and UC patients. The efficacy is higher than reported in anti-TNF-experienced patients and is comparable to that of anti-TNF biologics in this population.
a b s t r a c tBackground and aims: The effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is under debate. Although controlled trials have shown that adalimumab is significantly better than placebo, the absolute clinical benefit is modest. We report data on the effectiveness of adalimumab in a cohort of ulcerative colitis patients treated in 22 Italian centres. Methods: All patients with active disease treated with adalimumab were retrospectively reviewed. Coprimary endpoints were clinical remission at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 54. Secondary endpoints were sustained clinical remission, steroid discontinuation, endoscopic remission and need for colectomy. Results: Eighty-eight patients were included. Most patients had received previous infliximab treatment. Clinical remission rates were 17%, 28.4%, 36.4% and 43.2% at 4, 12, 24 and 54 weeks respectively. Twentytwo patients required colectomy. Clinical remission and low C-reactive protein at week 12 predicted clinical remission at week 54 (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.36-19.44; OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.32-14.94, respectively). Previous immunosuppressant use was associated with a lower probability of clinical remission at week 54 (OR 0.67, and with a higher rate of colectomy (HR 9.7, 95% CI 1.46-9.07). Conclusion: In this large "real-life" experience adalimumab appears effective in patients with otherwise medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Patients achieving early remission can expect a better long-term outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.