The DCD livers were allocated according to the Italian allocation policy, primarily on a regional basis. 19 Superurgent patients and candidates with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥30 points were excluded. Most centers preferably selected low-risk recipients and prioritized candidates, for example, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Summary The use of temporary porto‐caval shunt (TPCS) has been shown to improve hemodynamic stability and renal function in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated the impact of TPCS in OLT and analyzed the differences according to model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD), donor risk index (DRI) and D‐MELD. This is a retrospective single‐center analysis of 148 consecutive OLT. Fifty‐eight OLT were performed using TPCS and 90 without TPCS. Donor and recipient data with pre‐OLT, intraoperative and postoperative variables were reviewed. Overall graft survival was 89.9% at 3 months and 81.7% at 1 year. Graft survival at 3 months and 1 year was 93.1% and 79.2%, respectively, in TPCS group versus 85.6% and 82.2%, respectively, in non‐TPCS group (P = NS). Intraoperative packed red blood cells requirement was lower in TPCS group (7.5 ± 5.8 vs. 12.2 ± 14.2, P = 0.006) and non‐TPCS group required higher intraoperative total dose of phenylephrine (16% vs. 28%, P = 0.04). TPCS group had lower 30‐day postoperative mortality (1.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.04), no difference was observed at 90 days. Graft survival was lower in patients with high DRI; in this group graft loss was higher at 1 month (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) and 3 months (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) when TPCS was not used. TPCS improves perioperative outcome, this being more evident when high‐risk grafts are placed into high‐risk patients.

Key Points Question Can the individual risk estimation for early allograft failure (EAF) be improved in view of liver retransplant? Findings In this multicenter cohort study investigating the association between donor-recipient factors and EAF, a novel Early Allograft Failure Simplified Estimation (EASE) score was developed. The score includes Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, transfused packed red blood cells, and hepatic vessel early thrombosis as well as transaminases, platelet, and bilirubin kinetics as variables on day 10 after transplant. The EASE score outperformed previous model scores, estimating EAF risk with 87% accuracy on day 90 after transplant; EASE was developed on a multicenter Italian database (1609 recipients) and validated on an external UK database (538 recipients). Meaning In this study, the EASE score rated the EAF risk (0%-100%) and identified cases at unsustainable risk to be listed for retransplant.

The length scales of film thickness nonuniformities, commonly observed in polymer colloid (i.e., latex) films, are predicted. This prediction is achieved by investigating the stability behavior of drying latex films. A linear stability analysis is performed on a base solution representing a uniformly drying latex film containing a surfactant. The analysis identifies film thickness nonuniformities over two length scales: long (millimeter) range (from lubrication theory) and short (micrometer) range (from nonlubrication theory). Evaporation and surfactant desorption into the bulk film are identified as the primary destabilizing mechanisms during drying. Experimental evidence through direct visualization and atomic force microscopy confirm the existence of nonuniformities over both length scales, which are shown to be functions of parameters such as initial particle volume fraction, surfactant amount, and desorption strength, while being independent of drying rate. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2008

Antioxidant agents have the potential to reduce ischemia/reperfusion damage to organs for liver transplantation (LT). In this prospective, randomized study, we tested the impact of an infusion of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) during liver procurement on post-LT outcomes. Between December 2006 and July 2009, 140 grafts were transplanted into adult candidates with chronic liver disease who were listed for first LT, and according to a sequential, closed-envelope, single-blinded procedure, these patients were randomly assigned in a 1/1 ratio to an NAC protocol (69 patients) or to the standard protocol without NAC [71 patients (the control group)]. The NAC protocol included a systemic NAC infusion (30 mg/kg) 1 hour before the beginning of liver procurement and a locoregional NAC infusion (300 mg through the portal vein) just before cross-clamping. The primary endpoint was graft survival. The graft survival rates at 3 and 12 months were 93% and 90%, respectively, in the NAC group and 82% and 70%, respectively, in the control group (P ¼ 0.02). An adjusted Cox analysis showed a significant NAC effect on graft survival at both 3 months [hazard ratio ¼ 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) ¼ 1.01-2.93, P ¼ 0.04] and 12 months (hazard ratio ¼ 1.73, 95% CI ¼ 1.14-2.76, P 0.01). The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the NAC group (23%) versus the control group (51%, P < 0.01). In the subgroup of 61 patients (44%) receiving suboptimal grafts (donor risk index > 1.8), the incidence of primary dysfunction of the liver was lower (P ¼ 0.09) for the NAC group (15%) versus the control group (32%). In conclusion, the NAC harvesting protocol significantly improves graft survival. The effect of NAC on early graft function and survival seems higher when suboptimal grafts are used. Liver Transpl 19:135-144, 2013. V C 2012 AASLD.Received April 3, 2012; accepted July 7, 2012.Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; DRI, donor risk index; GSH, glutathione; ICU, intensive care unit; INR, international normalized ratio; IRI, ischemia/reperfusion injury; LT, liver transplantation; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; PDF, primary dysfunction; PNF, primary nonfunction; POD, postoperative day.Francesco D'Amico contributed to the study concept and design, the acquisition and analysis of data, and the supervision of the study and manuscript. Alessandro Vitale contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, the drafting of the manuscript, and the statistical analysis. Anna Chiara Frigo contributed to the statistical analysis. Umberto Cillo contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and the supervision of the study. Alessandra Bertacco contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data and the critical revision of the manuscript. Donatella Piovan, Domenico Bassi, Rafael Ramirez Morales, Pasquale Bonsignore, Enrico Gringeri, Michele Valmasoni, Greta Garbo, Enrico Lodo, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Michele Scopelliti, Amedeo Carraro, ...

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract