Increasing concern has recently been expressed in the literature that the referring doctor's knowledge of radiation doses incurred during radiological procedures is inadequate. Such information may be particularly relevant when the expansion of imaging technology is considered. Hence the objective of this work is to assess the awareness of physicians about radiation dose and hazards of radiation. The study was performed among medical doctors at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Referral Teaching Hospital, the largest medical school in the country. A 135 self administered questionnaire was circulated randomly from a range of specialties; out of which 114 questionnaires were completed and used in the study giving a response rate of 85%. Participants were asked about the radiation dose from a chest radiograph, the annual dose from background radiation, and cancer risk from several common radiological procedures. A mean score of 7.1 out of 19 was achieved. 12 doctors had received formal training about ionizing radiation, and these participants scored higher than those with no previous training in this area. Our survey suggested that clinicians' awareness of radiation doses imparted during common radiological procedures, and the consequent risk to the individual patient is poor. A major curriculum revision of both undergraduate and graduate medical education regarding awareness on radiation is mandatory to improve this deficiency.

The rate of operative reduction of intussusception decreased by 77% following the introduction of USGHR as the initial non-surgical intervention. Therefore, we believe USGHR should be fully implemented in our hospital, and recommend that this study serves as an example to other institutions in our country as well as in other developing countries facing similar challenges.

Background: Physician-patient relationship is foremost among the numerous qualities needed for sound patient care. In the Ethiopian clinical setting, a vast majority of patients complain that physicians do not interact with them properly. Objective: Assess behavior of physicians (verbal and nonverbal) when interacting with patients. Methods: Randomly selected physicians were observed in doctor-patient interactions in an inpatient setting using a standardized check list at Tikur Anbessa Hospital in November, 2009.Mean comparison of total scores of each category as well as mean interaction and biomedical exam times were made using Pearson's Chi square, and Student's T test. Results: 211 interactions were observed. 22.7% were consultants, 49.7% were residents and 26.5% were interns. Mean total score of observed behavior ranged from poor to satisfactory across category and showed statistically significant variations. Average interaction time was 7.87 minutes while average biomedical exam time was 5.05 minutes. The means showed a significant variation (p=0.001 at 95% CI). Conclusion:The study has shown that there is a reasonable ground to suggest that physician-patient interaction has deficiencies. Due attention should be given to improve communication skills of physicians. [Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2011;25(1):3-9] Background Quite often, the subject of physician-patient interaction and communication is raised as a concern mainly by the public; but health providers themselves (through their associations), health authorities and training institutions have shared this concern through informal communication and exchange of opinion as there is no published work locally.

Radiology fellow trainees and resident trainees with disparate backgrounds in ultrasound showed significant improvement in their technical skills in pediatric ultrasound and confidence after viewing the tutorials. The web-based design of the tutorials allows integration of international pediatric radiology training communities.

Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality of the pediatric female pelvis and is often requested to evaluate girls with pelvic or abdominal pain or abnormal bleeding. The US interpretation can help guide the clinician toward medical or surgical management. Here we discuss the normal US anatomy of the female pelvis and illustrate, through case examples, conditions encountered when performing emergent pelvic US for common and uncommon clinical scenarios.