Fungal infections are associated with a high mortality rate after liver transplantation. To describe risk factors for fungal infections, 405 consecutive liver transplant recipients were analyzed. Forty-five patients (11%) developed invasive fungal infection. Median posttransplantation time to the first episode was 60 days. Pathogens were Candida species (spp) (n=24, 53%), Cryptococcus neoformans (n=10, 22%), Aspergillus spp (n=6, 13%), Rhizopus spp (n=l), and others (n=4). Presentations of infection included disseminated (n=9), intra-abdominal (n=9), esophageal (n=9), lung (n=8), blood (n=6), and central nervous system infections (n=3), and sinusitis with esophagitis (n=1). Eighteen patients (40%) with invasive fungal infection died, and 13 (72%) of these deaths were attributable to fungi. Mortality in the nonfungal infection group was 12%. Univariate analysis identified separate risk factors for Candida (intra-abdominal bleeding), Aspergillus (fulminant hepatitis), and cryptococcal (symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection) infections. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, a high intratransplant transfusion requirement and posttransplant bacterial infection were identified as significant risk factors for all types of fungal infection. The risk factor analysis reported here suggests that different pathogenic processes lead to Candida and non-Candida infection in liver transplant recipients. Their identification should prompt specific prophylactic measures to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

The role of OKT3 monoclonal antibody administration was studied as a risk factor for symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 229 consecutive liver transplant recipients not receiving specific CMV prophylaxis. Twenty-six patients (11.4%) received OKT3 and 17 of them developed CMV infection, 11 (4.8%) being symptomatic. OKT3 use was a significant risk factor for symptomatic CMV infection by both univariate (relative risk [RR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-5.8; P = .002) and multivariate time-dependent (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1; P = .001) analyses. A subgroup analysis revealed that OKT3 use was a significant risk factor for symptomatic CMV infection in CMV-seropositive but not seronegative recipients. OKT3 therapy for steroid-resistant rejection is a risk factor for symptomatic CMV infection in liver transplant recipients who are seropositive for CMV before transplantation. This group should be targeted for antiviral prophylaxis when OKT3 antirejection therapy is used.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-induced posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) develops in 3% to 10% of solid organ transplant recipients with a resultant mortality of up to 70%. Unfortunately, there is no current marker which identifies patients who will develop this disease. We therefore conducted a risk factor analysis of variables that might predict the development of PTLD. Specifically, since EBV may cause both PTLD and the development of monoclonal proteins (M protein), we sought to determine if the development of an M protein preceded and therefore might serve as a predictive marker of subsequent PTLD. Before and after liver transplantation, 201 patients were evaluated for the presence of urine and serum M proteins. Patients were followed to monitor the development of PTLD for a mean of 1,733 days. PTLD developed in seven patients (3.5%), three (43%) of whom died from disseminated PTLD. PTLD was classified as polymorphous in six patients and monomorphous in one patient. Fiftyseven patients (28%) developed an M protein after osttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder P (PTLD) is a serious, potentially life-threatening syndrome that occurs in 3% to 10% of solid organ transplant recipients, depending upon the type of organ transplanted. A causal role for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been invoked, because pathological specimens from patients with PTLD show evidence of EBV gene expression.2 EBV is specifically tropic to epithelial and B cells through the CD21 r e~e p t o r .~ Following infection of epithelial cells, the lytic phase of infection is characterized by massive viral replication and shedding. Thereafter, EBV becomes latent in B cells and may lead to cell transformation. In contrast to uninfected, resting B cells, EBV-transformed B lymphocytes produce and secrete immunoglobulin, notably of the IgM class, as well as immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG).4Whereas the normal host's cytotoxic T cell response against infected B cells results in their eradication, the immunosuppressed host is unable to effectively transplantation: five of seven patients (71 %) with PTLD and 52/194 (27%) of patients without PTLD. Multivariate risk factor analysis for the development of an M protein after transplantation identified cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor seropositivity (P = 0.0002) and postoperative symptomatic CMV infection (P = 0.019) as risk factors. Whereas EBV serostatus of either the donor or recipient was not found to be a risk factor for the occurrence of either an M protein or PTLD, the development of a serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) M protein (P = 0.04) and of any urine M protein (P = 0.01) was identified by univariate analysis as being associated with the development of PTLD. Further studies are needed to determine the predictive value of M proteins as a marker for PTLD.

No abstract

Forty-one consecutive liver transplant recipients were studied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, reverse transcription (RT)-PCR of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and viral blood culture for symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The techniques were also used to predict the occurrence of CMV infection. For diagnosis of symptomatic CMV infection, the sensitivity and specificity of the different techniques were as follows: PCR of serum, 100% and 45%; RT-PCR, 25% and 97%; PCR of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, 83% and 35%; and blood culture, 83% and 86%, respectively. PCR of serum was positive in 83% of subjects with symptomatic infection before onset compared with 17% positive by blood culture. While viral blood culture was the best technique for the diagnosis of symptomatic CMV infection, PCR of serum was best at predicting the development of symptomatic CMV infection.